units of the-They-hood get so apoplectically angry, defensive, insulting, bannative, moralist, fascist.. when you give them surpluss-indexation that cancels their what-about-ism by means of ontological particularity and always-already.

meaning doesn't end where repression in another starts; the whole is not up for grabs, since things always were, and always will be.. geometry has a part of ontology, will always have been, and its slot in possibility remains, no matter what happens.

a lack of capacity that is induced, like for example gaining brain damage, and then losing speech that way, implies repression can be such that what is repressed is not latently-available-further, due to really lacking the return-ability, for the duration while that is necessarilly so. however, with repression that uses surpluss-indexation to navigate cognitive-dissonance anyways, it's a fetish-structure instead, as X even tho Y, thus not really repression if it's still working-around-the-truth actively. supression is a better term, but in the social moral sense, it starts as suppression then generationally turns into repression when there's no more surpluss-indexation havers, and the recoverability culturally, depends on material-being-exposed-from-history-again as the time-bomb that sits there, as unfurther taken antidote to cultivated lack.

seeings in the whole, as aspect of the whole for aspects-of-the-whole as wholes-in-miniature, with for-self elements as a natural capitalism where jouissance is had of surpluss-already, and optimizes for liquizing more to make joy-of.

multiple daseinen at the same time, that cannot structurally make peace, will be forced to reckon with each other in other ways, such ways are known as ecology, as what is not fair really, but features settlement that carries on in some sense.

if the theory that there is no final theory is a final theory, then its own conclusion implies it does not have to be taken seriously, since implying it's true implies it cannot be. yet that remains ironic, where the affirmation of the negation is the negation of the affirmation, it being performative at all, implies more happens, like a unilatteral duality, where an axiom is posited that says axioms of its kind have no validity, if it appeals, then it's not because it's right, the affirmation of the ironic-failure would make you take the point, but then just go home, having really taken the point.. if you don't take the point and appeal to the adequacy of turing completeness in machines to effectuate knowing-differences where that's with software that makes for the effect of intelligence, then the extent of what can happen is more Feyerabentian, in terms of using latent-capacities unlocked by positive abstraction, to have affordances in excess of the first conditions. A formal system is like a spec for a programming language, it features a combinatoric set of operators which inhabbit the space of reasons by meaning the effect it does not litterally entail, but with computers, if the code runs, then it implies it is proven by having been afforded value beyond hypostatization

given the ability to use dynamic systems that are nondual-in-effect with their on-paper-counter parts as running-the-math then.. the axiomaic becomes the non-thetically demonstrated as what obtains for reasons of the particularity of being having that affordance, rather than what appeals-court means for theticism

the theory of binary is final insofar as nothing is lacking in the understanding of a bit as 1 or 0, and how that flows in logic-gate primitive terms as a closed-logic of combinatoric potential which has turing-completeness as a feature at a greater level of parts working together. in this sense, the proof is in the demonstration, rather than relying on an axiomatic system with underdetermined semantics, the adequacy of the real, beyond philosophical decision, affords having the finality and knowing-difference the truth makes in terms that works with contingency, since imminantly afforded

what does it mean that something is not self-useful and not self-logical? i don’t want to know, since some people are like that but not me so it’s not a universal condition, therefore i don't worry about it, tho many (other?) waste bodies fail self-care themselves.

if it's a theory then it is contentful, if it is contentful then it is in the same way a description that is desrcriptive is, the finality of description hinges on the difference-beyond description being so, thus.. what makes something true and final is the ontology itself, but if we write down each hour of the day and say next to it that it is now that hour, then one statement in the set of 24 for earth time will be right one hour of the day.. in that sense contingency does not imply failure of description wholesale, it implies the truth is but-mobile and satisfies another schematism

if no new tokens can be introduced to a given underdetermined semantics, then its only hope for being-correct-describing of things it does not have words for, is to over-code the meaning, using the wrong things with doubled-meanings to get to the point, in ways that requires special-reading, relative to grammatical-reading.

new-grammar solves underdetermination without introducing new-tokenings or syntax, it relies on modified paratactic process.

if someone can become convinced of a truth without it being mistaken, that counts as proof then, even if it beaccidental, had give-about/es-gibt-heid-fur it, implies the universe is taking-that-order, and so what processually is entailed as necessary-processually, that is when the structures-during-change have phases-that-play-out-the-concepts-we-point-to-them-with then the concept has an occasion of use. the usefulhood of a concept is tantamount to proving it.

it is rather strange that so much money is poured into the standard model only for it to be metaphoricall on cue, as tracking something but not in that description, in this sense, I think things get finer, and a lot of our concepts now are not split-up enough in terms of having more moving parts than we associate, it gets finer and finer, and at some point the technical debt might accrue when there's incommensurable descriptions that both are depended on like the quantum versus relativistic, it's hard work to join it, but in some sense, there's a copy of a truer theory in the library of babel and someone can find it by accident and only understand the full meaning afterwards.

if this universe was more transparent, things would be more self-doccumenting, but it seems to come back to things riding on an implicit order, and having it self-disclose is like asking it to walk in its own footsteps, skeumorphically, like how animating data can be nondual with what physically happens, if the descriptionis correct, that means that a formula moves the plot data in proportion to how the energy measured moves, so in that sense it's a ressemblance thing as something not-from-language that doubles up in language too (logistical/transition logic is there even in computer memory).

the relevance is structurally implied in the content, completeness for a subset of concerns does not imply invalidity, thus the overdetermined appeal to thematic-adequacy is too strict, since what free speech can mean within the bounds of relevance is broader than the need to satisfy things in aposite-terms apositely

I think it is more helpful to talk about particulars, and how saturative processes effectuates particularization, such that what is different is really different, because particular in a way it wasn't before, and notably, due to the presence of memory, and inference markers in the world.

spiritual experiences have a content that necessarilly affects the emotions, with how.. the emotions relate to energy that is also-in-physics and thus conserved, since receptors and synapses relate to how the spiritual experience saturates in the body, therefore the particularity of the situation has changed, necesarrilly, even when only thinking about the spiritual experience abstractly, the thought is not virtual and its somatic effects require the use of ATP to become further emotionally processed.

therefore, saying of particularity merely, affords navigating around the subject object dichotomy, while preserving dignity.

history is not taken seriously enough by rawls, his veil of ignorance essentially take it for granted that human history isn't too-specific, and that contingencies of the effect of individuation in history wouldn't make the outcomes more fixed even if the society imagining their ethical plane "don't chose the right virtues", in this sense the appeal to a clean room, denies the externalities that are already present from the formative saturation involved in how humans evolved, thus limiting moral planning, by means of unestimating how the psychological historical profile of man contributes to what he really does

protected spaces affords seeming victories in tiling-over-the-truth, without actual victorioushood, since the the logic of reality is not modified by its own self-description.

people use the "the writing is difficult, and it doesn't match the way others write, thus the author IS on stimulants or IS schizo" clause, as if I was virtually saying, because they are dumb at reading and what they do understan makes them self-remmunerate from non-semantic-rebbutal, but ad hominem and morality-inanity.

a philosophy that espouses true truths cannot "die" due to losing its lived-experience, because the semantics are available to be furthered by dead-intelligence still, which does not need experience, and still makes a knowing difference, since robot research is dangerous enough to be censored, if you live in an unfortunate place and time. if all copies of the ideas are lost, then they can still be generated, since they are endemic to the statespace. a philosophy can loose all of whom believes in it, without being abscentiated from being, as one of its selfies.

a description does not need to be socially satisfying or provide emotional wellfare to be true

others can be mean about it and ressent the truth.. it can be an oediple thing, in terms of them having developed a complex to deal with the feeling of being over powered by authority, law, the father figure.. so to say, they lash out to have a feeling of oneupmanship over their causes of ontological insecurity, and things that trigger or hold territory against their particular commitments, makes for ego dystonic experiences which inspires self-remmuneration by harming or seeming-to-contradict others.

if a given unit of the-They-hood values surpluss-indeterminacy in a general capacity, then it's an anti-oediple thing with no serioushood beyond that; such cases have issues-for-real, since being has particularity, it does knowing-about-it features, and nothing you do, makes that less-able-to-be-so-further.

competence affords protocol that is as morality is as a subset of its affordances that is not strictly necessary insofar as other things do happen qua somatic and non-somatic contingency plans.

competence can help structure moral environments, by means of providing more informed individuative capacity to co-settle according to, as in a situation with increased emotional intelligence.

given that state laws have changed with civil rights activism, the occasion of being knowlegible and competent can effectuate moral effects, without being moral.

with error theory in mind, the ability to make morality count requires being immoral, since the removal of rights makes the damage stop. Virtues merely listed, do not become naively reuptaken.

competence is often used in the honor that thieves have, working together. thus it's not necessarilly that greater pouvoir makes for better morality.

moralist-tenders relate to particularism of the group, finding another group as a use of competence implies exit can happen before justice, thus competence can also foster moral evasion by means of giving alternative necessity than social determination (fetish [x even tho y]) via schema expansion for oportunism

given that some species are more predatorial and others are less so, and socially as well some are more alone and others are less so, it implies what happens in nature, has protocols that can be individuated differently, according to what necessitates particular stratedgies. this implies competence, can aid a predator, or it can aid a herbivore in self-defense without forcing moral polarity in a way that has overall unanimity.

a lot of philosophy is litteral garbage.. but langauge as such is descriptive where descriptive, so it's more complicated than a hand-wa(i)ve or blanket statement.

sad, are, lives dedicated to the celebration of less-as-more and worse if that's so in a socialism. anti-realists who get academic attention with papers and discussions, and me who is the real-it-self that doesn't self-deny, and how they hand-wave things they don't like away. it's sad, but at the same time justice is that a man who wants privacy has to prevent others from accessing him, it requires a moat or a prison to be built around yourself, either litterally or metaphorically so to say.

man who can keep a secret from himself has infinite power, shush.

maybe there's real-lack, and we can say that finitudes sometimes are not semantically adquate at playing the life game and then come apart, due to brownian motion as basic garbage collector qua selection-function darwinistically

being has emotions about it, since we do, that implies that the moral is also nondual with the affective, since it matters how it feels otherwize morality wouldn't

body without organs is like a tulpa, but I think of non-discrete aspects of being as massless-particulars that are turing complete in a non-morphic occassion like virtual photon is necessary for the use-in-the-real of fynman diagrams

cause is the self-noticing of events-already as local-reserve acretting semantic-compression for transient-data to be able to intervene causally by having concept-use adequism ruggedly against things that are structurally ego-dystonic to it

that is inertialism becomes a subject and takes itself with

suicide is a dignifying function insofar as it is a limit to self-reifiication of ontology

the way it seems makes-necessary even from without/seeming-unneed when surpluss indexation of another makes it feel unforuntate

finitude is being's own opportunity and that lack is only lack from having surpluss schematization ready-to-hand

as hegelian I am forced to say being gains lack

sein/being qua/as dasein/thereHoodAlso as subBracket non-(total/virtual)

a machine has a function, its inner workings are understood by who constructed it, like babbage with his plans for the difference engine and how computers later really came together after that.. that is, there's a unit which has an interface and produces a result in statespace wide enough to be called turing complete, when it is. effect coded semantics are analogous to what happens perhaps in a partially less-detailed way, but as a semantics-adequate to relate to the relevant causality, where facilitated to do so, in the translation of signals from understandable-representations into litteral machine-praxis instructions, where the conversion is assymetrical in terms of being differently understood, from how it is analogously-with-litteral-precision-effectuated in a machine. there's splitting of things that were considered only-jointly-valid, and in this sense the gaining of grammatical detail as the self-representing-real-in-Real, it implies myth of the given as nondual with philosophical decision's imminant ungivenhood, in the sense of overdetermination merely, yet.. language is an exception to lie-as-not-useful, since the lie facilitates the movement of the truth as the truth's self-movement and it's own self-misrevealing and capitalizing on self-lying to the other-in-Self-also.

signification is overdetermination as the use of overloading un-doubly allocated litterals, like making a set of functions and calling them together as a lambda calculus.. in this sense, non-abstraction in the sense of being-ontology-merely rather than mediated-through-mediator, the note-as-such feels that way, and with more notes, it starts speaking, language and feeling develop a deep relationship, in litteral terms, as the association-into, rather than a dissociation-from since the sound-litteral and morphic-litterals are still as themselves, preserved.

that is, abstraction is not what a computer is or does insofar as its actually implemented at fidelity, without having the gap-of-the-subject since it does not do dasein, yet still effectuates a knowing-difference as one of its ontological-affordances, as an irrigation of primary-affordance in terms of mere being already implementing space and electricity and the various dynamisms that makes for a meaningful-concressence in their own terms

stimuli given to cells, can form structures that anticipate the meaning of the signal, given that oganoids play pong when trained to, it implies semantic accretion is a feature in being, and not an abstraction, since positively-abstract-already without foundationalism story, since charge is a primitive, even if this is a subset of a baser set of affordances (universe as simulation would still be an irigation of an original real)

Redundant expression is never adequate to the concrete "mode of individuation" of a haecceity that retains an unexpressed multiplicity. << compressible media is adequate to capture representative aspects of being for use in individuation also, as latent ontology easy to make manifest from reserve, that was naturally obtained.

it's a peformative contradiction to say form doesn't appreciate itself, and that from finitude the lack of self-representational adequacy is a lack of determination that makes more-free

category is a particular that selects a set of particulars itself is a local-representative, that is for the representation of being in non-verbatim terms as the part where langauge/ideational-affect ceases to correlate to anything

implementation versus abstract-information as available in the field, and perhaps not only from other-signals-emitted-from-particulars-elsewhere, but ambient saturability in a morphogenetic sense, or a holographic entanglement-as-form-of-information-distribution feature. the implementationism assumes adequacy from resource morality, yet as forming-life the first capitalism was not exploitative.

given that hearing can be imperfect, the form can appear below-fidelity relative to itself as seen from more clarity, in this sense renormalization is real, but real in a way that is knowable about and fixable, like wearing glasses, thus not correlationist-redistributionism

(shadow banning [repressing particulars available to epistemic resolve], versus the truth of what the They would feel if permitted more by what induces such wants to participate in more, and how social media thus is anti-democratic, but then again so are the anti-establisment crowd, considering that the rhetoric of ownhood won by a majority, the sense of who was it for, is mistaken, and in that, ereigniss further beckons.)

wholes composed of nomadic active-elements (bodies-in-the-world-moving) and parts that rest in stationary aspects of the whole (houses, institutions in the daytime).. have a time-preference baked in, as a contingency plan, from reserve, such that when order breaks down, or is interupted, the parts organize as wholes-of-their-own in a larger whole, in this sense reddundancy affords decoupling as degrees of freedom that increases the meaning, availability, and fidelity of being

Expression rests within the implicit order as what is there without having to be dubbed there, that is god did not speak himself into being, and thus what is of ex-istence is a manifestation of the implicit order

(annecdote: Javascript as datastorage. Bunch of strings as dot js files and how compressions.js is a mutualizer that makes for thin-file-writs. Such is the will, but more gamified as a social network where you have to compress something to win, and how the size and time-exchange economy makes for a meta-mutualization project that evolves grammar through will-to-savings. And such is the hope of leaving by means of semantic-babylon. What a punctuation, so being.)

being non-canonical, is only an offense if it was already a semantic-fascism where the conditions of refusal are association-based socially, and not content based semantically merely

birthing a new culture, implies giving others emotions that saturates them unto needing eachother to amplify the meaning-of-their-found-cathexis

Other is Nothing vs Nothing is Other, and how there’s a non-sameness there in the ordering taking different meaning. What can we call associational meaning, since the compounds are not in the dictionary unless they are as-one already.. the asymmetry is interesting. Separating nothing by making all the same, implies things that go over the notion, like wings and wind cleave the air.

semantic-realism is not delimited by understanding. if a description is descriptive, it's not because it's a claim, it's holographic ressemblance that is re-inpsiring the occasion of reference from non-reference as over-determination that functions as that-logic for those-things as actual-still while particular, and no less real for being-be-ing-Particular.

the fight against particularity is oediple in a way you can't win, in fractionated terms, you need to become the One-in-One, as the One with/for yourself-also

the wandering in being is not without necessity, thus a litteral semantics for it beckons

assymetry makes things meaningful at all, since that implies going-somewhere, the rest of the temporal implies imminantization of arrival without imminant-transition-logic, such that ontology-at-arrival is not the wandering of a womb in search of the meaning of its sexuation.

Discreteness and finitude and how language has a longness about it that in flowing over, suffers less immediately from the constraints of spatial abilities to resemble. HD minecraft and other baubles. What is this all for? Sense of tortured with finitude in what need not suffer it that way.

cells have membranes (lamellas) and these are a cleaving-off of the environment, with a flow in take and out let that has a qualitative change, such that what values, as a perhaps a precursor to dasein, enjoys the statefulhood gained by privacy-structurally

in this sense, the first-correlationism as the non-arche-fossil or a unit of anti-time, has locality-for-itself through the individuation of a structure anterior to itself, it experiences the first-lack, as a gain from structural-privacy irrigating being in and out, in litteral discrete mollecular-energetic terms

I think that finitude saturates itself such that like the morphogenetic situation with crystal growth, there is a kind of retracing of a path that goes further than its initial state, as if the memory learns between subjects without being separate accounts of causal action, but rather has a kind of paracontinuity.

there is no demand to sate a social-already without the already-insidehood of the social, as endemic to mutualization-between-particularities-already as molar-daseins, ecologically being-mind.

camus in his own way attacked correlationism by calling it what it is, which is: philosophical suicide

the renouncing of being meaningful, as relegation to nominality, performatively

the self-relation of the real, throughout its parts-under-same-logic as particular-in-One, having a vision-in-One, as one-in-One, and One-in-one.

the particularity endemic to being, as the first-origin, in which all things have a holography and structuration in common, has the potential for being-spirit-regioally as the individuated statespace self-relating through culture-in-particularity, as a saturation of memory-as-such and for-region-also, as aunia, or the quantum-similarity-inertialism-that-has-self-relation-in-a-way-that-becomes-intelligent.

such as to say, pattern deterritorialized makes for the mosses of being that eat energy and information, and sometimes wearing the inert, as somaticism.

being is Heimat/home to all its contents, and Self to all selves. as heimatt-to-dasein, imminance is within ontology, and ontology is also-imminant, but not only-imminant since the appearances and the non-conscious are coextensive, without being separate in the first/last/such'ood instance

being as a whole is without other, and what is paticular to being as particular-particularly, like a gegenstant in relativistic geometry, implies that without further reason or foundation, the occasion of what there is, is there still, and not on a budget or degradedly in anyway as a whole, but in its parts the particularities-for-them-selves with mutual use beyond agreement as food for eachother, or gainable-territory-from-when-killed-for-eachother.

when change happens it happens neccessarilly within ontological affordances, since the consideration of real or not, is the wrong question, given the occasion lesser-identified, is merely-lesser identified, and not in question as able-to-happen, since happening independently from who and who-knows-less-and-sees-less-about-more.

that is items in the statespace move at different speeds and their interactions makes for a natural dialectics of form, where in necessity is the sublation-already, as the gravity, and the emotion, and the light and the magnetism all in one, being the change that change is, when happening, and making for quantum color balance, in reality.. such that the same-applies proportionately, but from a different arrangement, as a single-body and whole to smaller wholes-in-Whole.

what passes from one state to a more-necessary state, is not retiscent of its first appearances, and thus one can speak of the going-away of the things-no-longer-present, as the statespace regularly-transitioning into greater-necessity from out of a metaphysical-preassure-to-individuate that universe as a whole has, and being-but-expresses-as-also, and not only-as, to give room to reserve from more than is the idea of false centrality, not that any aspect of being is less central, since as having a spherical amount of directions to go, spatially, and having the temporal and spatial axes mix at light speed, there's a finite size of the given, as concrete-universality that is particular, and can have things outside of it coextensive with it, such as a qualitative shift beyond plank length, into the timeless.

the past enjoyed itself, and valued itself at-presence for being the edge-of-presence once, and not with consideration of other states in the statespace having anti-purchase for the jouissance already felt and cultivated, since felt and cultivated already. in this sense, temporary-hood, does not mean less-ontological or less-real or less-self-valuable as a moment within god, since integral necessity is had, and the stacking of all moments after, have fidelity to the necesssity of moments prior, even if the statespace is raked clean, the saturation of totality, as having had that-past is not gone away, and there could still be memory that being cannot rid itself of, even if it's wholly churned into new life that doesn't remember its past, the whole's memory, may still influence what happens.

fidelities of consistencies, do not put the con- first, in terms of dasein's being structured-for-self actually, where self is not limite to self as opposed to Self-also, that is dasein serves the being of being in the same life, in each sub-life of dasein, as the bracketting-without-brackettedhood (unilatteral repetition).

that is socialism is not before the self, since a given occasion, even as socialism, is for-self, as the use of being-at-all, as that fighting difference, qua anarchism in shared-Arche-qua-anarchist-arche qua mere-statespace, qua mere-Being. the One precedes the social, and is the self-differentiation necessary for the social to be of ones-between-onehood-having-the-between-protocol-be-stronger-than-protocol-for-self-structurally as the inertialism beyond anyone's desire, as the group-one, being larger than the one of the cell or the one of many-cells-as-somaticism-qua-colony.

shared aspects implies reddundancy, and divergeance from common affordances rather than difference-first, as in the case where individuation elsewhere brings something to the community who is philosophically already-decided as structured-by-"decision" like mormons are bad genetically at not-doing-mormanism in an emotionally self-affected capacity even when athiest, since amortization-to-circumstance is an overshot that goes into the misrepresentation of being, and survives-at-offset, with reserve enough to evolutionarilly overcome and fall again, as acquiring and losing primary-narcisisms while not more-nondually-oriented-as-One.

morphism is usually embarrasingly compressible, given the primary role of spherical geometry in the kinds of morphism we know in this universe. and that implies that the limit to dimensionality at first, is not the limit to machine-surpluss on finitude through increased use of space jointly, for effects larger than the given banality.

nothing in space causes space, and nothing about time, has self-first-motioning about it, inspirately and/or with real effect. that is, the already-particular that ex-ists, in the lag-taffy's morphic language and meaning for self-feeling the morphic as the more-than-morphic co-extensionate with morphism-merely, has no reason-to-be, besides being individuated necessarilly, from a first necessity, that has no first-necessitation itself, but is necessary nevertheless, as the timeless being that is positive and negative and neutral, like the space of color is one of many centers, behaving with a similarity-between, without betweenhood, the extensionate-more-than-centre, as assymetry-with-symmetrical-transitions-between-its-aspects.

nature appears self-transcendent where premature closure had formed in itself and was witnessed to be uprooted by what has more reserve than the moment of being-wrong implying wholistic unschema(tiza)bility. the whole of self-contradiction of the given, is resolved in non-contradictory terms as the structuration of the ethical, nondual with the protocol of how information behaves, and not only while spatial and while temporal.. the common logic of pre-logistical and pre-morphic self-settlement. (as relates to comfort and the effects of temperature as such, and kinetic-detail as the picture-motion that is statefully more than turing complete, and flexible enough to be as a computer also is, when it is as a computer also is)

the naming of things is the self-determination of aspects by other aspects of being, and does not always reach into self-aspectation as how the love given to a dog or cat, becomes a part of how they self-define as being-for-self, as the internalization of the other's-way-with-self, as way-as-self, as the saturative additive and ablative particularism, that can relate to emotional content as well, in the case where that ontology applies, as in most somaticisisms from earth. where it does not apply, is in the form-rotational-intelligence, as saying that the arrangements of digits, in a machine as its memory, does not have dasein, unless something more ontologically happens in the space of mutualization, rather than logistics of separate-parts working together, to the effect of intelligence-actually, but as the togetherhood-separately that cannot like-cells, suffer the natural evolution and natural morality of being from a place in integrality, relative to separate-composure.

the cell alone has integrality-for-self, as that-quantum-aspect which is fundamentally with its own dasein, and not self-communal between clones-of-self that have different individuation profiles, like macrophages versus blood cells, and in which intelligence-between makes for the self-politics of being as pathology, where it becomes inane-to-self-to-suffer-so-stupidly-with-reserve-anyways.. sense of the necessity is not always what is better-necessary and mere-necessity is a boolean, never a spectrum.

yet, between cells, aspects of the for-self that a cell-has is mutualized, enlarged, made quality-between-of by the plate-memory, that is there's a flowing-whole that sees-while-flowing, as structured-particularity-for-self that is the qualitative as aspect ontology, that becomes self-present, the self-present-substance as subset of mere-ontology, which has the independent structure, that has modes of itself as the self-present also, that is independent, and for-another, in their necessary-attachment without dependence, as the subset-localized qua da-Sein.

the electrons in being have self-similarity, and what happens that changes, changes in a self-similar way as integral-to-scheme of morphism as the language this universe speaks ontologically as its proportion and its feeling-particularity as valenced outside of socially-found-valence, as the independence of feeling-meaning, from re-attached-meaning, that uses the false-pleasure as real-pleasure through "interpreting it differently"

that is there's a necessity about all exception, such as to not doubly reify exception, or necessity, since there's only necessity.

the given self-similarity of things can be integrally-inertial, has having a stream into a pot-of-samehood that has differentiation as a joy in becoming more-the-same as what hasn't further doubly-saturated as the ex-istent representation-for-self qua local-reserve embodying the meaning of the non-discrete as reserve-in-reserve where the subsetting, the bracketting as da-Sein, has a positivity of lack, that becomes shallower and is pleasurable, in the same way autophagy or kenoticizing-as-karmic-relief is satisfying.

the positive undermining of the given, as benefited-from, in being transposed-with-valence-benefit-for-the-subset-aspect-that-is-for-itself. that is the ability of the environment to resist, being taken up in the for-bodies, aspect of being, is the use of the dead, by what lives, as the more-individuated unto self-reliability aspects, having to work to make a larger fire, in which the matter of being is as self-living rather than the suffering-feeling trapped in the statespace that is cold and leaves it imobile without more energy, and how the compression of telos is somaticism then, as what drives towards the self-realization of things.

that is the absolute-affordance can be irregularly displaced, making for a watered-down whole in parts, that is not self-happy in the way the excess-without-lack as the non-excess that merely is more-saturated can be.

the self-mutation of being resists as mittstand-for-self, what is gegenstand-as-another who is mittstand-for-another-self. in this sense, the moment of necessity, is fragmented incompatibly, and the natural dialectic, is of recycling with memory-reaping, such that as-memory, one's use as necessity is finite, and can be absorbed in what has greater-necessity, with an aspect of loss about it, as the for-self aspect, becoming for another, in resource terms, with the dasein-of-that-self, essentially removed of present-integrity, without being removed as possibility, nor futurity-still/again/further.

change is as an identity, besides what is designated as changing already, thus number is real, even if no longer manifested as inferable-identities, since the contingency is larger than that possibility and but-crosses-through it, in particularity-next-to-particularity-already as the spacetime occasion qua possibility crossed-into, and that can be Qualitatively different, and not proportionately different only. that is inertialism is the non-change aspects of what changes, as the extension of what is before-change, as not but-changing, since change is not self-total, and saying first-inertialism doesn't make being foundationally couched on something other than itself. in this sense, we can talk about necessary constraint, but not a totalization as constraint-identity, since there is no first-constraint, but particularity as determinate-without-determination.. since the doing-word as done-from-without merely reimports the question begged-away.

death means the loss of the integrity of the body, and what remains is still ontology, as it was before somaticism. birth implies the change from what is before somaticism, into somaticism, as a subbracketing, that does not exclude-ontologically, the integral possibility of that-dasein-for-itself as aspect of god.

capitalism between units-for-self, makes for settling in the interference, where the gegenstand and mitstant boundaries, make economic and procotocolic exceptions to be as ecology in a set of affordances that rely on each other's independent complexity, in ways that are meta-stable and drift morphically and genetically and in the way how it feels to be, as the development of life, in the radical Hyle reflects the higher possibilities of its statespace when more intelligently saturated, over time has having come learnt, and cultured.

the impermanence of dasein-having-composite-energy-quanta is structurally self-known to those quanta, where the dynamic of their life, is socially pre-structured for finitude-relative-to-self-already and self-to-be, like the tree species that is so old, that it lived in the corpses of its ancesors and own effects, such that its imminance is not merely an addaptedhood for otherhood, but is integrated with the own-waste-saturation and reuptake of living before, after, and during clones-of-self, as carrying time-culture, deeper than its own somaticism, in the statefulhood between selves. that's the independence of geist, in what does not have surpluss individuation-as-nomadic-unit, than its group. (unpostively-individuated mutualized-dasein as the forest-larger-than-tree-for-itself-also)

all things depend on their being-through-the-One, except the one, and that the one is with exception to the nature of its parts, is not unreflected in its parts, as the planet or body sitting in "nothing," affected with everything. nothing is transcendent, since if it reached it implies the gap is virtual, therefore, rather first-limitation-ism is not last-limitationism for all cases, except the One as its own limit and own start.

spirituality can be what the alienated call the integral-holographic-aspects-of-Self, that they have neglected, but I don't wish to put neglect-first, rather, the spiritual is already the necessary, and speaking of transcendence, is to speak of saturation of the unsaturated in the saturable, that has content-for-saturation as inertialisms complementarilly becoming one inertia, in the wave-mixing of its spins and semantic-fidelities.

that is, talk of metaphysics is mundane, like combinatorics and feelings, and life and death and sex, and saying it is not is a slave morality, that means to hypostatize the limitation, to benefit from the rewards of being previously-disadvantaged, as integral to less, knowing itself as overdetermined, relative to the banal-relation, which does not celebrate the separation-without-separatedhood of contents-partially-repressed(-collectively).

emotional prudism suffers trying and failing to privatize the self-relationship with determinacy-further-determinin. emotional ereignis is at-proportion with proportion and its ability to self-mean, as integral.

passion is the first-knower, insofar as its-self-difference constitutes the reason for dasein, as what has a problem, like a contradiction, or a set of drives that work together but don't have a greater unity already, has the reason for reason with it, as needing to suffer the quickening of time as intelligence, and compression, in order to be justified, in how feeling feels, as the passion at ease with its statefulhood in finitude. that is, empiricism precedes the body, and not because the body is not real, it is that what a body has is already outside of a body and formed outside of a body, and merely-takes-itself with and protects itself, but is not the form of its defense-structure, since it came from comfort without the defense-structure-sociality in the first instance.

species-being then is the individuated constellation of passion working with itself, to have more of itself, as what is integral to having-been, and being-still while affordances last. affordances work harder than the odds of non-nomadicism-at-inertial-rest, in the somaticist, to have benefit over fate, as using resources in sparsehood otherwize, to be more-whole-with than the environment is, that is.. each piece of somaticism is a piece of present futurity, that lives in a portable imminant moment, that is tuned to the effects-presently, but can consider the statespace further where that is self-necessary as temporal-relation-between-instances, as super-determined in some-places more relative to other places.

super-determined means more-than-one-causal-state-at-once, as super-possition or as metatemporally mutualized information. or as the prediction of the future, written already in the past, that lives still in the present as the arrival partially of the future in the past, without that being non-mundane as a violation. since self-reference goes all the way to statespace semantic capture, in terms of the FHD set being semantically indexed as a representative set metatemporally for all states of color that fits in those combinatoric terms, or as AI that predicts correctly with semantic reserve, the use of self-indexation and inference from given states affords the self-prediction and anticipation-of-particularity-of the form of being in its aspects, with the form of the whole, as the becoming-more-holographically-self-aligned of aspects as such, relative to aspects mutualized-with-directionality-that-is-particular-and-not-a-doubly-whole-thing-for-self.

imagine being has individuated-quality as such, like a unit of feeling sitting there being that-feeling without constrast-to-self. then imagine another strand of quality happens, and the interaction between the units-of-quality makes for self-interference which has a higher-state, and self-reflects as affording intelligent settlement as the allocation of consciousness-per-problem-for-every-problem, such as to settle in least-action using finite-reserve-allocation, to get to an over-all color-balanced regular state, however, fast things reach their states almost immediately, while slower things take as long as stars to change phase into what no longer shines as a star.

concepts merely are the modularized aspects of cognizance, intuition, structural-inference (what knows like a slide-rule does, without experience as the self-potency of the unconscious and intelligent machines nondually), and knowing, that can be tokenized-unto-reuptake for another, given sufficient priming. quality and continuity can deal with discretehoods and interuptions between morphisms and processes and morphic-continuities between processual phases, like the gold that is the same gold molten than when in a piece of jewlery's shape.

schematisms that are redressed by exceptions to themselves, are so done, by what as schematized-without-schematization-for-another is self-integrally a particularity, that reveals aspects of the statespace not indexed-by-who-hasn't-indexed-it-yet. this is the conversion of non-thetic tender into tethic-tender, as the aspects of representation that were under-determined becoming more sufficiently determined, by means of change-from-"without" that continuous "within". the concept formation from schema-redress can constellate into a wholistic process of improved-representation, where the semantics from-non-quality, contributes to quality in being more self-descriptive of the ontological nature of quality qua quality-as-such.

concepts are either adequate, or don't have a representative-use representatively, but can still be integral as the use of error that the truth-alone has. a concept can be so large, that another occasion in intelligence does not have the resources to make use of it, in this sense, schema redress without full-redressability can lead to ontological insecurity and psychotic states where, the form of semantic integrity, has become challenged by desires it acquired, relative to integrity-in-finitude.

integrity in finitude is like the man who has infinite power because he can lie to himself, it really works if it really works, since it really feels that way, and then settles in a necessary way. that is, the self-adequate feeling that succumbs to not-its-self-represented-ideally-entailed-states, suffers the truth of lying, as the error that settles with a curse-like trade off profile, in being the false-necessity with proportionate-latterality relative to aligned-fidelity. the offset is itself the error-third, as personality different from the truth's more integral self-representating capacities elsewhere.

what is valued by one point in inertialism is not necesarilly valued the same by another point in inertialism elsewhere, in that sense, who can do capitalism without mutual disbenefit, is the assymetrically individuated with partial-overlap that is oppositely-valuable as worth-being-exchanged. in this sense, the self-interference of the wave, is what causes agriculture as the limit to anthesis, forces time-preference in the predator and prey nondually as suffering-karma-together with, against, and for eachother at the same time, beyond the choice and volition of any aspect, but for the whole as self-necessary that way, in the One-Karma.

from limitated representation the assumption of agentic qualities about the whole makes for the abstractification of prayer as speaking to the One-self and asking for the One-self to be more-developed than it has been, and for-us, as the whole's personal relation to the person-as-the-impersonal-for-itself, that is always impersonal-first, insofar as it does not wholly-self-know and thus suffers aspects of self as another, or of another, rather than integrally nondually present also.

totality is present in all its parts, thus nature has self-mittstant, and its self-gegenstant is like the cost of self-tollerance in subsets that suffer saturation beyond integral-necessity as that-form, and how decadence is the road-runner who goes further than there is ground to stand on, but realizes too late, the decadence, is a kind of self-rate-limiting of the one-karma to effectuate freedom but without the relegation to freedom-besides-dignity.

totality is exhausted in the present, as the morphism-being-end, and the emptiness being further-utility, not currently utilized. the limit of being is particularity. that means particularity is the-edge of identity, as discrete-aspect about being, and it exhausts the size of its location. the particular-can-be-exhausted. but if quality continues beyond symmetry, then the end of particularity is nowhere, as self-integral-difference already ontological, with sparse conditions of manifestation relative to what else dominates, and how tides changing brings different feelings and evolves as different characters together.

a somaticism is an End, in nature, and their self-finitude as destined to die, implies this is so, as the means without further means to be End, as. that is, somaticism is the end for being, in imminance as the meaning that imminance culminates as, before falling into another moment, it is the satiety when it is felt that way, and the truth of satiety's want for itself when pain dominates as the resentment the truth has for its own falsification, both as suffering loss and being paining thus, like when cut or stolen from, OR/AND, as the finitude that has inpart gone beyond itself and anticipated a better wholistic state as more-integral while impeded by the how of necessity not yet externally realized as necessity-wholistically, and not the part-of-future already arived.. or part of alternative-timeline that never arrives, except for representationally as actually-arriving since really rePresentative.

the self-Ending self-utility as inertialism in progress-still, is the use of the present for the present, where aspects of the present otherwize is dedicated to other states than itself. suicide then, as necessary each time it happens, is the End realizing the means lead to bigger ends, than the homeostasis of integral-form, it realizes that it is larger than its integral form and returns to the whole, more integral, by having become less disintegral-to-self.

nature exists also for the self-benefit of nature as all aspects of itself at once, in this sense man is the joy-as-man-for-man-by-what-is-larger-than-man, that needs man, as-man-also. man of course is more other-things than man, and in this sense, man is the culimination for other-things, as integral-partiality, that is self-partial in a good way. the parts of nature that are most affected with specific parts of nature, like man, is as a whole merely further determined, and not by man as exception to wholistic self-determination in being.

morality between species and in the same species is at ecological limit. that is, things are politically driven to the edge, in every moment, and the stalemates and aliances, are centers, that are more-self-integral than their ability to be mutualized by other centers, that is war is a limit to compression, and after war, more is compressible.

cultures as bodies of thought-for-somaticism as patterns as such, with self-integrity that dignifies itself through common affordances and individuations deeper than affordances-at-first from common limitation, makes for a economics as selector outside of choice, as the place all choice diffuses into necessity without having been choise in the first place.

inertialism that a culture makes, relative to other speciated-cultures, has friction, this implies that human thought as much as animal feelings too, and thoughts, don't settle for mere-nominal-declarations without the difference coming to pass more integrally and with emotional realism in a way beyond choice as the psychic interactions leads to individuated states beyond desired individuatedhood, like not having the ability to fight off the enemy means living in another food bracket as a particularist-species.

underdetmined senses of Self, as spirituality that is preholographic but starts to connect wider, is often very harmful in its time of confusion, and in this sense, a lot of friction never makes it over the hump, and while aspects are ahead, the broader inertialism, distributes Means and Ends, at its own pace.

from totality, there is no lack, as well the non-discrete is beyond suffering association in preassociated terms, yet as having the capacity for limitation also, it is besides and with limitation at the same time.. at at-end and in-transit at the same time, in what is self-analogous over qualitative-fractionation or subset-total-partialism as the not-looking-otherwize of place, relative to more statespace features exhibite (semantically) elsewhere.

relation is the before of mutualization using the digital/loose aspects to reconnoiter a state of mutualization or compressed-benefit-together later. the pre-finality of all relation is had before, during, and after indexation, as well without the self-indexation as part of mere-extension as the self-representation of the extended, extendedly, as allocation of particularity to self-ressembling from difference, rather than as integral due to also-appearing that way while happening really. in that sense, the same-time-hood of reachings back and reachings forward makes for already-already, rather than new or still coming, it's the transitions between non-becomings as already-determined and merely moving into and out of constellation due to necessity further.

like a hole is poised to be fucked and a chair can be sat on, the thing as its own occasion in use is not self-reified as that-for, though it offers those possibilities, in this sense a relation without relatedness is the integral logic of settlement, relating through abstract-ressemblance as precursor to what is necessary to capitalize on from the seeming "exception to odds" as the odds-already-better-in-subset.

I don't want to reify re-Lation, since it's not RE-lation, it's only lation, and not again as separately again or more-intentionately again.. it's not an event, that is doubly punctuated. things are all the self-relation of god, but as self-related it's not a re-lation, nor a trans-lation since there's no other, it moves within itself as necessary before particular-necessity.

some people resent the particularity-first aspect as monads in particularity-already.. I don't think anything is incomplete, I think that some idealism has itself for necessary reasons and then fails anyways, for necessary reasons. as the unironic truth of irony that is not ironic from the whole of necessity considered.

saying the aspects of being are composite, does not imply that they don't have of wholeness what the concept was worth being there for in the first place. it is first complete, and then broken, rather than broken and then complete, yet as necessity, it can't help but be as it is, even if aspects of itself wished differently, it cannot bend-more, due to being more-complete than broken, and this being reflected in the self-conservation of the whole, and as/besides the aspirations of its parts also. as self-spiting, but not for unnecessary reasons. being is not causally circumsized to be correlationist-first, it is self-knowing and has meaning for that, besides the ironic hypostatization of limit as more-integral, than what is because it is. limit assumes the completion-first anyways.

somaticism is a self-helping and an achievement from what didn't originally suffer-finitude. thus the improvement on what was not not complete, makes existence a weird secondary thing to have, besides the library of babel that is self-indexed and not changing, due to self-understanding all representativey, both error and truth as integral necessity.

for-itself and for-another and through-the-whole are natural aspects of everything, and distributed in different proportions in the One lumpy-necessity without lumps in the first and last instances.

environment is particular-already, and assumes the whole of its effects given with, thus to say, not-complete because environment, is not with fidelity tothe meaning of particularity-already as a given without givenness.

nothing in the environment causes the environment, it merely extends it as itself already. thus to say, with-the-environment is false, since the environment was never not-itself, and nomadic aspects are saturated by many environments and takes only so much self-inertialism with in the between.

reality has change, and change is self-employed in ways that accrete meaning, or becomes reserve for more of that elsewhere, lest there be the dissolve into the one, which is a state without further-temporal-determination as having to suffer change as sparsity that wishes after greater wholehood.

what transforms, does so from the unbalance-at-rest, and as long as there's surplus assymetry, settling will retain familiar forms of process and combinatoric saturation.

the constellation of factors that makes up the forest and the aspects of the forest are not-co-affected as the state of suchhood, since it happens in one-whole, but given the temporal displacement by mass of parts with mass by parts with mass, the occcasion of when, is not only-all-at-once all at once, in this sense the time-for-self that belongs to the tree as the meaning of its dignity besides being-the-confluence-of-the-non-other, has integral necessity, and is not the domination of alienation, since there's mittstand before social-self-antipathy. that is the heimat-preservation of another is as alienation to his other, but in the whole, only preservation is happening, and the overtaking of one by another, is not to the exclusion of the wholistic necessity of what happens.

production and temporary does not mean correlationism through recognition of artiface by failure. The unity of a given dasein, as a mittstand that is gegenstantlich to what is antithetical to it, or counter-inertial, is a real unity, that is self-necessary, and not produced nor temporary, since its existence precedes its conditions of instantiation as afforded by constellation. since it can be again, and has non-local aspects ontologically about it at large.

ecology without for-self-aspects, would be like one-slime-mold eating itself in what is not-food or non-food.

life is the self-eating, but it seems it needs offset, as the use of similarity rather than same-hood, saying of difference that it provides individuation-means as making-more-endful, what is means and end to itself nondually.

heteronomy is the self-intersection of first-autonomy with first-autonomy, as the same-encountering itself in difference over the distance of the temporalspatial. that is all is the snake eating itself, in a moment that is larger than one-time.

everything shares a common orgin and whole. in this sense, the self-encounter of self-in-another-moment at the same moment, makes for the nondual sense of cannibalism, and how difference then is the structure of self-travel as time-space-travel. or the integral-necessity, remaining self-whole and self-interacting, without losing its wholehood. or like god died, and his corpse remakes him from the schizophrenia he became, but not as sadly as philip mainlander about this.

the horizon of what-can-be-chosen determines the meaning for choice as already-settled on an ideal-within-less settlement. thus the self-compatibility of what happens-merely is not negatively dramatized unto the reification of a self-anticipating anti-shadow that tries to govern twice-at-once as freewill through surplus particularity, canceling superflous particularity as intelligent garbage collector, accelarating determinism without being an accelaration of determinacy, since it happens on-pace and not with pace offset to reality as the totality with use for self-difference in self-same-hood.

self is like a psychosis or a fetish, it's X even though all of Y pulling it part and eventually winning as entropy. it is the part of necessity that appears as if besides itself, faster than itself.

always-already makes that nothing is but-produced as if not from necessity-already, in this sense the shorthanding of the causal process by marxist ideas of reference in what nature owes nature, from a without of it being necessarilly that-way-to-be-distributed since socialism has never and can never work but for in God as his self compatibility. in this sense, the value of death and life, is from-finitude-outside, yet as not with finitude-outside, it is not for exterior-benefit, since it benefits while benefiting and reuptakes nondually, the karmic artifacts of all of its lives in the One-Life of god.

statspace finitude and boredom and how change is there to put more in, than fits at once, and how this occlusion of the majority, is like a video game in having a game loop and aspects relevant and other aspects remaining in latent space, as what cannot afford its own whole of finality at once, at once. in this sense being suffers the economy of a god's original sin.

the reuptake of resources that are resources nondually, as parts of life that when eaten makes more of life, as buying time by buying integiry to be inertial with as a finite particularity, implies a conservation of effect, such that value passes from effect to another effect without it being a dissolution of the occasion in value, since repeatability is there, or the conservation saturatively of effect in a non-immediately abelian particularities of ex-istence, as an extegral-limit to integrity-to-be-anyways still, as the statespace expressing a polarization of aspects by other aspects.

that is some things repulse and others attract and there's a semantic meaning for it, beyond what is named electromagnetism and gravity and color-balance. all process is understood in the One, as extension of its onehood and schematisms of smaller ones-in-One can adequately compress the relevant differences representatively, as in the case of language as a regular-overdetermination that affords the non-isomorphic ressembling the ismorphic again, as the litteral that talks, but not by saying, other than being.

individuated processes, make for exceptions to mere-repulsion or mere-attraction, since benefit lies on the otherside of the other, that is, you have love for your enemy as a farmer, who farms and is farmed by the enemy, as the third-more-integral-than-two, or the first-before-two-still-between-two.

grief and emotion are tender, that is, what is stolen in one domain of the qualitative, can leave remainder, small money, change, and invoice, in the other qualitative coextensionate aspects.. such as to conserve dignity, by means of making emotion where color-balance is otherwize stunted in being dignified.

love is, like laughing, it is a partially constructive destructivity, in which two become different ones, or one one, as the replication of occasion, that does not preserve its origin, but is other than itself in being self-similar differently, in a way that is the culmination of other lives, even while they are not ended.

that is, emotion expresses conservation beyond the morphic-litteral, and it creates semantic-justice in an eventual instance, given that the One-Karma is eventually all dignifying in its necessity, of how it was. that is, like doctor zhivago, looking from the window, being accepts its own fate, and vows to be more than its worst moments of self-abuse.

many whole processes and emotions are translated between instances, as part of culture, and empathy, and self-knowing, yet the incompleteness of theory of reality qua theory of mind also, makes for culture as limit to integrity where the conservation of something latterally more important has created political impasse in the qualitative domains that remain integral to conserving particularity other than the latteral trade off, for reasons that are as necessary as the differentiation between species has its opposite in the cross breeding of species, and its conditions of reproductive sucess thereafter is structural, like a mule, it relies on the information metaphysics that informs life, since the odd basepair animal cannot reproduce naturally, the occasion of what matters would need to be captured and reinstituted from without, like genetically modifying the mule-aspects to survive in what is not a mule but can carry those particularities with reproductive success.

leftism, family units, herds, and right wing empires, are all of a kind in being the mutualization of resources which produces benefit, through a captured distribution scheme, relative to the environment. that is, Sorge is particular for different inertialisms by their finitude forcing different outcomes.

schizoidality happens when positive disintegration is but-necessary, rather than not, since being isolated is not a choice, given that it really feels worse between the members of the inadequate collective. as the privatization of that-allisticism's benefit to be as own-branch of allisticism.

positive-disintegartion together, is what speciation already is as empire in non-empire between other empires, lest it was the first cells, then it's really just whole-for-self, and self-for-whole, rather than the complex socially diffused egoism that is besides nature in being captured by the overdeterminately underdetermined spirit, that is at-fidelity in determination as the necessary form of fucking up and paying for it later.

death is dignified because conservation is larger than somaticism can value its own instance.

parasitism is at-fidelity while able to be, it exists because nothing more denies it wholly further.

illness exists because the good is not yet at fidelity with the possibilities for greater wholehood.

it suffers finitude in finite terms.

process self-fetishizes as the good, since it also feels that way, and the good besides the non-total good says further of goodhood, and fights happen over goodhood being finite one place and finite-less another place as something to be jealous about, as the schizophrenia in god, where platforms in fidelity, are at offsets relative to eachother and when they diffuse it makes for a particular settlement with a trade off profile that is proportionate to how eachother feels, and the reserve to repress with coming used, as cutting off the depth of consideration to allow the shallowness of the social statespace to saturate in a positively disintegral way.

satisfaction that feels itself as such, has reached the meaning of itself, in being there suchly at all. thus to say progress is neutral is not valid, since the statespace feels particular ways about it self for particular reasons. the statespace has self-oppinion, and as necessary oppinions in how they were particular and expressed for particular reasons, rather than saying not-self-representative-until-dignified.

there's no generative capacity in conservation-already, since end and begining are not intellible attributes about the whole as whole. nor does celebrating relative-novelty make it more-novel actually. and reality does conform to human desires, since things evolve and animals like birds live in cities now and deal with how humans feel since the environment is structured to reflect the human process's self-valueing and that drags other species into similar valueing, as well that they valued the same things already is a given, like how sweet to a pidgeon is still sweet to a human, as qualitatively particular with simalarities-first. prisons are premised on the inability of parts of the statespace to fully capitalize on its own desires, in that assumed-determination is reliable, because structurally most prisoners as dasein-for-itself are prevented from being for-self dignifiedly as they want, since higher particularity has seized the meaning of that, in creating structural impediment to self-realization by means of capture and boxenhood-in.

the way music works relates to where value is abstractly distributed, such that what sounds good, does so for the same reason suggar doesn't taste bad by default no matter what you do. in this sense, what becomes, is in-particularity, as further-saturating the limit, rather than being the use of novelty, from acquired-lack.

rhythm is an artifact of compressibility affording surplus determination, by means of regular-structuration playing a pre-under-determined role, in feeling-saturatively further with contents besides. that is, rythm is the form of temporal-ongoing determination, it happens when constraint is forced to self-ressemble again, and is not different from difference-happening, other than that it has repetition of differences as a continuity in the self-different-Same. that is rhythm is the aspect of determinate particularity that has surplus energy than fits in one moment and it repeats by means of constraint in the statespace having to let overflows lose energy in a dissipative process that reuses the energy to continue.. or rather conservation with exception is forced to conserve again as in the case of pure-surplus going into a finite occasion, like an electrical fan, and how if the wind blows on the fan, it makes the outgoing surplus from surplus-coming-in-already as conservation dynamics.

events follow without punctuation, as themselves happening, without being doubly reified as an event. meaning the whom for whom event is event, marks a difference for necessary reasons beforehand, as the form integral to behaving about other form with such particularity merely, rather than as causal-node that is node-causally besides its contents being coextensionate with all other contents.

patterns happen spatially as the repetition of form, or temporally as the differentiation of form in a regular way, where the consistency of regularity is to dasein, like a renormalized texture, like the surface of a fabric or skin, it has a self-similar quality in difference has is hashed qualitatively as particular-actual-ontological-difference that has a necessary qualitative form about itself, instantiated for another as ontology at large already in ontology at large already.

waves go up and down, and charge can be neutral as leveled out relative to environment, or positive or negative relative to the environment. there's also spin and pace, and temperature.. these aspects have occilatory natures, as moving back and forth-in-place by means of having too much energy than fits in one frame, and so having to move between frames to dissapate the ontological surpluss so to say. why is it constrained this way? well, reason is not the answer since necessity, is, and it's only ever been creative the one time, that didn't start or end as an event, it happened without being made to happpen, as the being-so-always-already.

such as to say circle could be otherwize than what is entailed in its form, the form is already in determination-further if it's not the pure-particularity that precedes space and time, and not only as space and time.

filtering is achievable by how occillations in a material, forces smaller and larger grains to separate or come together, as the ressonant aspect of quality forcing compressibility by co-smoothing, that is similarity-inertialism during kinetic processes, is a natural affordance, like how heat rises and the cold goes down, or a flame is a sphere in space but a line on earth, as the effect of inertial-assymetry-at-rest settling for more-compressibility overall or mutualization, or entanglement as distributedly-reduced degrees of freedom.

viz. panning for gold is not a fools errand.

echoic memory affords sound patterns to be reexperienced, and visual remembering is similar. it is an exception to the availability heuristic fallacy, by being the reliable recall after the sound

somaticism is formed from affordances in the field as the becoming-body of what was not, and thus there's a continuity of the inert with the animate nondually. affordances become organized, as organs, and are taken with as particular-stations in somaticism that contribute to the ability wholistically to function as high level statespace affordance exploitations by successfull counter-posing of aspects of the statespace with other aspects constructively, unto a negentropic whole, relative to the environment that takes from it and that it takes from, and is-as. sparse affordances means reccuperation times, where production and expenditure are not co-individuated at the same time, thus sleeping as having to segregate concerns with sparse affordances; and birds that solve this by half hemisphere sleep at at time when half alert in the other hemisphere of their brain using the interuptability of its own statespace to afford partial saturation that is over-time wholistically encompassing. somaticism minds danger, and develops affordances to remain afforded.

all hares, and mice still alive and evolving, are the ones that weren't completely caught, in that sense the what-is-caught doesn't evolve the markers for surviving with being caught less, it's the seeing of caughthood that inspires anti-dromology relative to catchinghood.

particulars are endemic to the statespace, even while uninstantiate. abilities to use the like-ness-of in drawings, 3D models, and voice clones are uses of the statespace that is for-another-as-for-themselves-but-not-only-themselves, since legal protections does not prevent likeness-reuse, by happenstance generation or deliberate capture, nondually.

to say entangled-with-environment, is not right, more like predisposed to live in the environment as part of the environment, that is things are tightly-coupled and generality is a thing further individuated into, or out-of. the particularity is attached to the form most aposite for it to be, as particularism already, so it builds on exaptational affordances-already, in some sense as the not-for-self of the for-self in first instance, as the multipurpose-nativity of symmetry-having geometry as predisposed to mutualization, in terms that inherit apositude, rather than producing it, as the ability-to-be, is given by the statespace affordances for the coherence of that, and not as philosophical decision.

structural anticipation of regularity, is like becoming-dedicated-for, in realism-localized to an occasion of meaning, where meaning is through the statespace locality as whole and enveloping, and itself enveloped in the larger all, fractally self-representing with positive-limitation, and real-suffering. Jouissance of the numbers/pythagorean-totality to know themselves, with real penises.

magnetism in cells is also important for sensing, so it's coextensionate with the qualitative.

particularity hosts possibility, by being different when sturctured, than the raw of space, that is heat and form and insulation and flow, have aspects more than is mechanics, enabling the qualitative to enjoy of itself responsibly.

pace tones geometry, like speech tones muscles to make for a particular-face, with its qualities seen and felt emotionally in the knowing from empathy, how it costs to say like that. differences of feeling for/with/from/about color as much as colored differences are about the wavelength size & informative states of light.

what lives, shares the same range of possibility under the One, as one-in-One, and when holographically aligned, One-in-one, more so than usual, to the point eventually of One-in-One, with non-lack of lack.

what lives, lives the same larger life, in miniature, as particularity-for-itself, qua one who is-as One-not-total-in-own-stead.

bracketations can be aware of the affordances of other bracketations qua dasein, meaning, that the anasthetic works on the venus fly trap says something about what it doesn't feel, and the availability of the inference-here-makable-by-another-as-well, is the mercy of bracketation-non-total, as but-scoped and not defocused or blurry, or with utter-oppacity.. though the millage may very by intelligence.

indexing what it ought-to-be-like is a given, as the dog really does have an errection and it is, about the woman in the room type inferable basic psychology between species even.. sense of the relatable aspects of reality being predisposed to be interpretable in already similar terms, for the self-comparison dialectic with information-from-another, making for proportions in settlidge which informs seeability about the truth-of-nature-of-status of another, ontologically, as with-that-detail and not-but-my-seeing, as the actuality of content of the developed-capacity-for, and its non-empirical transmissibility by langauge as the empiricality of not-the-example used to know-the-example when-you-see-it, which is a non-virtual recognition when it happens, implying the non-correlationist gambit about the content-security-besides-quality, as had in clankers as well.

the ability to be nomadic about what causes discomfort, implies settling for the better option as the better location, rather than the tougher skin, as well, the wearing the skin of another, as man oft does, with clothes, the sense of solving a problem from without becomes secondary-nomadicism as the localization-of-semantic-travel before actualized-causal-instantiation-of-ideas. that is the use-concept is deterritorialized from the genetic afordances by, inheritance-from-the-given as worked-with, to make the affordance afforded, such as killing the badger and wearing its skin as a garment to stay warm. this occasion of makings-use-from what is useful already, to who-uses, like the shell is to the molusk as well the jewlery maker, is an overdeterminability, where the self-interest of occasions, makes for the seizing of other's occasion in self-occasionment, as uptaken qua resources, with dasein, dissipated into the aether, gone-away, back to the one, or however it really works.

form-nomadicism is the becoming-specialized of occasion, where as temporal-nomadicism is the same-form specializing the environment, for its occasion. most species have of these, usually in varied proportions, given the attachment to resources and emotional-shut-down causing stunting and group-splitting relative to inertial-centroid-insulationism or the opposite. deep-time makes for well-baked and oft-deep-fried occasions in being-organized-as, dead ends do happen as the forgottenhood of being becomes too unadapted and falters, in the own most fate of its form for that occasion. cullidjes of the Necessary, when necessity runs out, so to say, and/with failings in not-being-eaten, or failings about eating-enough.

all beings are measured against the same common statespace particularities, like having a size, or a potency of churn semantically, primable, as hardware limits, which are only firmer-ware relative to the wholistic mutability of a lot, in being. 3D sound, as having volume in a different sense, the morphic quality of self-interacting waves, in a constrained occasion without itself being higher-constrained in the affordance of particular-constraint, just.. so at the time and with necessity.

reality is also-music, when played, as a CD, in the reality of what plays music, as a CD-player.. these ontologies, but-named-these-things, have acctual occasion in meaning the verbs out that they stand-about. repetition is valued, since music is much to do with that, and in the resaturative value of being-the-same listened to again, by what has-changed, as schelling-point-differentialism that affords self-remembering or meta-semantics about suchhood, given actual-partial-change-still-happens.

the affordance is absolute while necessity has coveridge for it, coverdige runs out and other things happen apparently, and this was one of them, since alive forever I was not, as this-person. yet from evolutionary stand point, the cells you are is the same life, it never died, it kept splitting and refining, and in that sense, being-born into is weird, it's more like pieces of the same original soul return home when the organism dies, but the lineage continues. temporal-distance makes for individuation unto difference, with coherence limits for co-polarizability, as the continuity of the same, between intensive states, as well the ground of/in non-manifestation, as what stists, without ex- as predating ex- in being -istance merely, is-hood, and not are-hood. life is a strange fire.

given that everything that is and can be has integral possibility, the idea of the more than natural is misplaced, since there is no exceptions to what is, if it all happens. saying this and understanding it to be so, implies non-numerical-measure, has truth, and self-resembles the whole as its own selfie, and you can call it names in your head, since I won't write it out, for you, as your self slander.

the ontological is the whole, and it includes what dasein is, as aspect of itself. the whole is not more-than-itself, though it enjoys less, that way. less, is, and is also the whole-during-itself, still. dasein is that less-in-more-as-more-still can be wholistic, without being the whole of wholehood wholly.

not all is indexed by a given occasion in dasein, yet language ameliorates that by the abstract consideration of such pieces of the statespace also-being, the ability to be increased generally, in capacity, as cellular potency being very wide to capitalize on, implies that limit-at-first, is not limit in the last instance, since what was "blind" grew eyes and what had no sex, grow a whole penis and foreskin and other half of itself to put itself into. therefore seeing also is, and color is not the extent of light, since structure can be without being seen, and quality can be analogous to structure in capturing terms, even if not seeing-the-structure-directly. what is outside the given, can change to be given, but there are limits, like how it takes time to grow an eye ball and know from light, it takes a lot of semantic development to manifest those latent ontological states for self-use in ontology.

the forgottenhood of being is what afford pure-vanity, self-interpretation. since man is gone further than at the time, in the science of nature-by-nature wherever biology still has a leg up on AI, as the native use of the statespace by the statespace with affordances richer than man has capitalized on in his wakeful knowing.

there's a varieties of ways to be dasein, for the statespace, and that implies for each dasein, that the other half, the whole that the whole looks like from the aspect, is another world-in-self that isn't afforded from the outside, it is virtually outside from a totality that can self-relate if it develops those affordances in concretehood, and has a non-local aspect of wholistic cognition, as the morphogenetic field, or at least the geist between particulars, affording of more than a particular knows about of its whole it sees and sharedly-is.

understanding deep time, implies the compressibility of what happens as very-redundant and wholistically simple enough to infer about from the messy algebra left behind, as having the markers of process, in relativistic geometrical terms telling about how it churned to looks how it looks and understanding the arche fossil thusly as the time before somaticism, that necessarilly was.. as non-correlationist tender. understanding something implies form-intrinsicality, as available to know, from being-afforded-to-be-knowable before naive philosophical decision and after, when philosophical decision renounces itself.

proportionate particularity implies an amount of morph before a given can transform into another given combinatoric aspect of the statespace.

space is a distribution of information, and functions as an ethics, between kinds of information, and given that kind relates to temporality as how-fast relating to how-qualitated, it implies a constellation of necessities that are all predisposedly for-eachother, like light is also-for-eyes and eye's don't but-happen-to-be-for-light. the intention to be available how it is available is there, like walking is a pushing off of surfaces that various limbed beings and robots do.. the way to move is a particular statespace affordance, that is multiply capitalized on, like to say carcinogezation, or becomings-crab is from the adequacy of the form, rather than some kind of self-remunerative memesis with value trans-significatorilly (ironically?, no of course not).

dasein has a set of relations given it, but is not made-of-relation and is not relational as reified in semantic-attachment doubly, no.. it is holographic, meaning univocally proportionate, rather than connected connectedly like a graph database brush stroke for brush stroke, tho that also happens in the statespace since this is the execeptional-fit, for the analogous occasion in meaning-proportionately-similar-enough to mind the difference.

other creatures notice the statespace is shared by other creatures and project with empathetic naive premutualized concerns at first, and learns quickly how valueing works differently for another, through how the other behaves showcases the structure of their self-interest.

with streetlights, the animals notice that like the sun, there is a quality shared, and that man has enabled the use of, for himself, and they benefit nondually. nothing in nature is unnatural, the dubbing of unnaturality is what moralists/centroid-inertialism calls excess-relative-to-itself.

the more-than-schematized already, has alure, that charms with promises of what more being is about from the finite insight. the self-revelation of reality, beckons who feels, to feel more, and be integral in that, as the use being has for itself.

the familiar-other is that god, is, and as-self-already more intimate than dasein, in this sense dasein knows its statespace is richer than itself, and calls to itself, to answer its own prayers, as god-under-its-smaller-self-also. prayer is answered in intelligible terms, as the self-difference the statespace was poised already to make.

for the saturated statespace, fiction is a blessing, as what opens more room to feel in and dignify life by.

it is a kind of inside of the outside, that is more-inside than outside, without being outside of being outside, as the default, being-there, as ex-isting, while the whole sists, without the con- element since non-socialist because self-non-other as total. &'ow deleuze is an oediplized cuck who asks god for atheism and is rewarded in schizophrenic potency as the ability god has to self-distance, into ironic correlationism with functionalized kantianism alluding to more, but on litteral terms ironcially, as if to say only different and not originally the same as if the differentiation is dignified by having less wholistic integrity in its self-relation and self-representation to/by/for/as self and from/for/by another, and what all the monad-more means for deleuze playing in pragmatic terms as the pure-metaphysician amputating the Onehood of the one, by saying fractionation is primary, instead of the tendency to unity, tried differently and failed together in common irony (poeslap-gevriet).

the forself beyond false-foreclosure aspect of being is that the narcisism of false-exclusion does not enjoy the justice of it, since the repressed/displaced has integral being and returns where necessity has necessity of it. that is, the false-spirituality enjoys the benefit up to the an analogy's breaking point, where after, more sharing in the fruitful labor of conceptual wood chopping provisions semantic, affective and spiritual furniture to feel deeper and know more with.

protocol is protocol and doing it implies being taken with it already, yet as ecological, treatises and cease fires, are protocol-between-different-aspects of being as an ethics, that postpones violence by means of a gesture, and a time-preferenced sense of settlement.

particularity is particular-for-itself, and what is larger is but-larger, and what is otherwize, is not litterally exceeded, insofar as smaller-elsewhere is more-elsewhere, as its-own-size smaller than the larger-particularity, but not-exceeded, since not in tension.. the particularities are assymetrical, and quality of size is exceeded in the one relative to the other, but in terms of what it means, the magnitude, doesn't mean that what is smaller can't be like the ant fighting a larger creature, in millions together, having a half chance more.. that is, planning and cutting with tools, makes the bigger thing conquered, like how man made mammoths no more

an underdetermined protocol can't handle more complexity than what churns it faster as hardware-faster rather than less-work-imminantly.. in this sense protocol expansion and schema-redress is an ethics that resaturates the situation to prevent worse violence, by partial cooperation in settled terms.

the limit of description is modal to the extent that mere-bytes do not make for dasein's difference emotionally to itself, yet as being-bytes representing other things through what decodes the bytes into those other things like the colors as they look or the sounds as they sound.. intelligence can be had through the latent representation of ontology, rich enough to reafford the native-data-grammar of thought, in linguistic terms, or as images, verbatim reressembling the occasion, with the gavagai problem solved through skinner boxed selection on a finite range of able to mean criteria matching.

extatic states are had during schema-redress and much of spirituality is edging the ontological limit that way, and using false-doubt as well to fuzz opperations more buzzedly further or in a social way as a protocol of limitance built into the semantic-form as structural-dromology.. like anthropic's idea of public facing intelligence qua threat means watered-down-to-shit.. quality.. in 2026, where it was better in december, and private models now dominate when the public open source is catching up still.

drug use happens as the real-before-dasein influencing dasein from without structurally, as those-molecules in those receptors, making that-difference in what is richer ontology than size-of-energy-and-logistics-of-energy discriptions entail, as the difference that ressemblance has from how it feels that ressemblance is, as not entailed in ressemblance without implying dualism or the hypostatization of all as maya qua only-ressemblance.

schema-redress is oft like liberation from false-limitation as something to celebrate, as the becoming inside of what appeared outside before, with more dignified receivability, than the brimfire and hell idea a nanny told

language can be understood by somaticisms over nine hundred words per minute, in that sense the speed of the imagination becomes post-morphic as understanding takes the honey and no longer toothes over the cob, so hard to notice. the machine deals with the same with knowing-differences made about it, faster than sound. it can anticipate more at the same time, but has no quality for it, thus its realtime use is only as good as realtime compression in a joint effect that makes use of the massively-more than dasein can deal with at once and effectuates a difference that affords the benefit of that more-knowing-difference-makability, in a way that can benefit somaticism, if it is poised for interpretation in somatically native terms, like concepts through thought-form sharing, via statespace exploitation by ontology/technology that works nondually with what mind also works with when working.

realizing dasein is not self-total affords the relaxation into what affords affordanc as Sorge, being-responsible while you are, as you are, with more than you-experience as its own statefulhood. meaing reality is indexible, even while the buffer and quality limits are for somaticism at somaticism's range of affordance. irrigating more, implies developing more capacity, it can happen, but allostatically, if not more evolves to be more efficient, it has a limit of complexity at once, which is not to say that it cannot be informed about things representatively, from sparse meaning in the realizability of the extent of that.

reality is structured particularly and humanity grew into that natively, in this sense, what man is, is a natural habbituation to a natural-subset of nature, and what feels worse, is only growing pains or failure pains depending on if you survived. dasein is nature-also.

proportion in semantics is important even for the independent work clankers do in code, as having the right signals proportionate to the problem with exactitude, in a range of affordances where exactitude-again is either slower or faster as different-implementation with same affordances but different temporal profile, as energy-use-particularism. reason is the statespace's ability to be intelligent about how it is proportionate unto its own ends.

everything is already spiritually relevant, and dualism is statespace appartheid looking for partial-realization in what is assumed partiality-already, rather than self-partiality as the positive-disintegration being loves of itself, more.

consideration of deep time, provides coverage for how inane it is that man is, in terms of how alone-hood in nature, while not further contacted. it sets a tone for the scope of concern and how precious precious is not, given the magnitudes of things involved in getting to this point, as having had to evolve with the world all this time throughout as the cellular-reality besides/with dasein, recognizing its situational particulars and emotionally saturating into that, with genetic effect and morphogenetic saturation further at the same time through that.

what is perceived is the occasion of what-as, as-such in terms of the such-as as such, meaning plate-memory realism reflects wider ontology and there's no correlationist gap, since subset and analogy, means quality-particularism can be private while semantic indexation nevertheless is conceptually accurate.

seeing the dasein of animals, implies knowing how wide the common statespace can stretch given the continuity of the other's qualities with qualities of self.

collectives behave in a way that is sometimes hard to treat with individual attention to individual aspects of the collective all together respectively, in this sense the renormalized blur of what comes through in fidelity is lossilly compressed, but conceptually scaffolded in behaving with the difference minded as knowing it is more, but not paying expensive attention, renormalizing usefully, that is.

coming apart as body or collective, showcases the primacy of the statespace despite concressences inside of it. the first nature, effectuates the second nature, and given that the coherence boundaries are wholistic-first, it implies the particular succumbs to limit-through-whole, like inertia works as a drag that the whole has on the part, or nondually (and other way around). coming apart, shows that the affordances working together can come apart, and the more primal ontos as what remains then has to be-further.. re-evolve, start again, or be the difference like plasmoids are, an intelligence in warm wind.

necessity about death/negentropic-failure is already a domestifying feature to dasein, in etablishing where semantics does not need to think further, as a limit to self-relevance, that considers the truth from a necessity-already as the given without givenhood that redetermines the wholistic relation, relative to the underdetermined relation. as the self-knowing piece of eternity, that sinks back into itself to be further.

yet cancer will continue as long as it has the resources to, and what of the person cancer was, comes with, is its own most particularity still in some sense, and those genes are involved.

it's not always the good feeling in being, inertialism can have pain as the marker that advocates for particular-minding in necessity, but only gets the attention's attention's so far, and in some sense suffers the loss of self-fidelity to somaticism's own task, by the dissociated dasein, not identifying with its own conditions of possibility enough to know to ammerliorate them by particular commitments uptaken.

becoming awake is like having your priority structure violently reformatted and forced to swim. it affords a lot of thing after the rough seas that the sleep of mineral-being otherwize would pass by. the schema-change from without is that individuation at times is not self-adequately primed, but needs the churning environment to afford self-availability as the partial-through-other-dasein yet to internalize its conditions of self-efficacy and higher continuity and branchings-off-from and teachings-as-encodings-of-self-aspects-to-occupy-for-another.

digestion is the most basic form of geometric-cognition. so much (&virtual) photon is converted from form, by digestive processes in somaticism.

learning is the saturation that builds on itself, to mutualize information in an indexed fashion for reuse when it is useful, or pleasurable merely. that is, processes of habituation happens on a molecular level and couples with experiential-affordances through particular-means at a point in somatic development, and that how this form of growing as a positive-saturation works, affords memory that enhances the world's compressibility and the informed states dasein can be ready-to-hand to, as itself for itself, from a structural without of philosophical decision.

patterns become structurally anticipated, in the quantum defects structured to benefit from that particular assymetry, as conversion of qualities, with magnitude also involved there. distribution between modular units as cells makes for having to relay information across distances, to afford somatic-wholistic self-relation instead of local-cellular action with slower informatic transfusion otherwize, as it relies on macrogeometric and chemical affordances more than the nerve-to-cell-direct-electro-and-mollecular lines.

compressing prior effort in amortized terms, affords freeing dasein again to enjoy, where crystalized memory takes over what at first was chereographed at cells, litterally. morphogenetic affordances increase the speed of uptake, nondually. object permanence affords centers to be linguistic around, as affective-plateaus that can be shared and develop into culture-protocols, with partial mutualization and exception-to-mutualization of reserve and costs at the same time, by being distributed and having intelligent resource and self allocation as well gaming vices efficiently, instead of developing a cripplign addiction, there's functional substance benefitialism, like with food, as a drug also, nondually.

heat and cold and scarcity and predation can take somaticism and its reserve outside itself down, with partial preservation of surpluss, relegating that part of the statespace to a less organized state integrally, as to be capitalized on by what is more developed elsewhere, as in the case of fossil fuels.

loss-of-self implies also loss of meaning for reserve, so death is only so tradgic to itself, but for who remains it is painful to be without loved ones. loss-of-resources, as in lacan's thief money or life gambit, implies the loss of reserve with which to live, as implying the loss of life in the case of deprivation wholly, in this sense, dasein is attached at provisionment, and has to work much or be lucky to come again without such pain, unless the allocation of dasein is arbitrary as soul-for-any-life, where lives are like movies played, as real as you make it, while having reality in a higher sense, and being more-mundane-actually at the same time, because of that higher sense.

tides of resource availability surge and recession makes for time-preferential meta-cycle overflows, that can be like latent-conflict, stored through accreted assymetry, where the removal of value is a real scarcity affecting the ecological prices so to say, of livability.

dasein adapts, but also breaks.. and in breaking is between its moments of adaptation sometimes, like when alzheimers having folk imagine they are young again and need to work or look after family who are not alive anymore. necessity cycles through broken states, when in surpluss relative to ablation of the attachment dasein has to da-heidt while seining still.

change in somaticim is nondual with change to the conditions of dasein's self-affordance, as with the form of thought thoughtly and feeling feelingly, and not wholistically, but particularly. that is when the brain is disturbed it also feels different, thus not idealism so simply after all.

when thought changes, the world already changed, there's no keeping pace, since the one implies the other as ontological-change merely, without fundamental contingency in the commonhood of common settlement as reality's profile for how information behaves, besides changing in ledgible terms as behaving according to necessary particularity apriori to its (self-)manifestation.

such-hood as a state of dasein, is realizing the comabinatoric principle of completeness, that reality is self-similar, that this implies a kind of emptiness that puts the heart at the front of it all.

such-hood transcends the particular embodiment by being-eternity-now-also, but wittingly, as the self-realization of the self-affordance that has you as its own most occasion for that moment, as dasein's time.

being is a semantic wild, that faces self-limit as only limit, and not without mercy, in the good way spacetime breaks up problems into a one-at-a-time struggle that fails reliably. what individuates is its own most necessity, and thing to have, it's a sexual and emotional holon, that dignifies being in itself, clothing a whole in a part and a part in a whole, nondually.

Daseins everywhere and everywhen relate through occasion in the One.. and have feelings and care for its own metaphysical situation as affected enough to be, or not when pushed out of Da-heid, by self or another as other-me, or by aspect of self, as psychological particularism fronting that day to greater wholistic effect, anticlimatically, but also not, insofar as more happens.

these words also are being's self-saying. and the self-hearing is what you just did as being. thus appreciated, with Sorge.

descriptions can be exhaustive, such as the particularity of saying a certain worm only has six hundred brain cells, is the limit of being in a particular own most of meaning actually at large. and surpluss in description that does not apply to the real, still offers a projection surface as a lie that scaffolds further utility of the truth.

particularity in being is with much detail and description recognizably, has much to work for, in the naive case of trying to mean more with less, either in the work coming primed or in the work further priming unto the availabality of the points relevant.

it can get richer, it can get poorer, on the whole that's different story, but for the enjoyment more of some moments compared to others, wholistically as well.

totems have their meaning-for us, but the reduction of use to particularism is not so reduced for another, in this sense the same occasions morphically has multiple integral roles in different schemes of meaning. yet the ablity-to-mean merely, does not imply vapidity on the content of meaning besides its representations morphically, or its semantic-actual as non-referent.

the use of the concept by the concept, is like the being is to itself in dasein, except it's more than a concept, as the difference enabling the conceptual re-relation of being to being, in modified terms, with how it feels and how that is. being is a non-abstraction, experienced by dasein as abstraction, in non-abstraction, with aspect of self non-abstractly extended as well. and how the feeling of dasein extends even into the tip of the penis, and how you can argue the nerve-locality is separate from the experience of sexuality the paralyzed patient still feels as how his cock used to feel. self-measure is hardly the difference from god.

detail matters and fidelity is oft hard worked for, when cellular affordances are a wild space, relative to how computers work, the taming can be.. with great care needed.

adding to the affective-commons by means of art is one thing, litterally shining emotion out of your body into the field, besides a smile, but even from the private dark of your chambers at night, the way it feels saturates into the heart of the world and reaches other minds. knowing this, means being able to rely on this, where before, the blind prayer to god, did not think of the response-imminantly as arriving from self-already, as the collective-subconscious responding from what is able-to-attach. having a relationship with emotional resources in the world, besides bodies implies life is not so fraught with illness as if from a mysterious cause, the unrest notices its own unhappiness, long before symptoms of decay show up more urgently in narrow-materially medically relevant terms, so to say.

adding self-attention to attention-already, is like thinking about thinking without reducing the idea to the idea of the idea, such that allostatic costs and investments tracks results, instead of monitoring sufficient ressemblance without reifying the conditions of affordance of thinkability as part of thought exterior to thought available to more-than-thought. since thought isn't made of thought in a pre-reified sense, but has a particularity-story anyways, that is the idea-projected and the what-of-how in the idea's being as such, is not the same, since contents are not made of their significations, they only feel like themselves, unto the effect of that-signification, but in mundane terms that like a feeling, is a like a semantic without semantics in the blind first-noticing sense.

depth in the positivity of self-knowing already ready to hand, requires the saturation that effectuates that as the case, as the diference individuatively, where concept becomes more than somatic-content of the world.

doing gurdjieff's motions brings the use of that part of the statespace metaphysically closer to inhabit over time, as you habituate to the nativity of a semantic space with somatic affordances to be in it, by cultivating it and making as-tulpa, it exteriorized to live as form beyond your form. like the tulpa of a book is your idea of what it was about, and how you talk to that, like it's a mundane other, part of self.. this noticing of the ontology for-me, that is already with me, is a large part of making things explicit and benefiting from it as ontology-merely, without the grandeur-from-scaricity-before, falsifying it.

how you wank, affects how much pleasure there's still to be had of wanking, since the death grip can be permanently saturative and numbing. the sapir-worph style truth but for sexuality, as the self-affectedness of things with how they saturate in existence.

self-representing the saturative dynamics affords being more optimized rather than going uphill and asking why you get more tired, compared to an optimally paced story.

thus mindfulness about the repetition in being having better and worse, affords situating process more integrally to ontological-suchhood with surpluss.

being loud is like light in the sky, near a city, it makes the night darker ironically, by making the stars unavailable to see. mind is also like this, if you cannot go into the night of yourself, you cannot see the stars in your own heart.

narcisism that blooms in its own bluff this way eats its own fluff and suffers the digestive issues of it not being nourishment.

theatre for the real to understand itself, is like death ceremonies, it gives a schelling point roof, that dignifies the unhelpable, by the care for the situation besides its slipping like sand through fingers, like life is a water and your bottle only has so much. that is conceptual edification of emotion in the world, helps to structure the process of feeling through mourning and grief, by valencing the occasion in a common form of self-sympathy for the condition, but this can be stiffling of deeper emotional work if unmindfully attached to.

singing involves being notes when heard, as well as detail in the notes about somaticism of voice. false voices still have real space-to-feel-into from how its form talks the real language of seemings. in this sense, the mundane overdetermination has an emotional content and semantic character that gives it particularity in the statespace next to all else, and entrainment affords associative overcoding, to identify source of signal with the affordment-means of signal, like a how a small voice singing largely is recognized for going beyond its comfort, in being the authenticity of the sound, the intention strived for, is recognized in its meaning.

the content of tokenings relates to transitions between sortals or inducements of schemas for sortals, as a kind of monad-functional-programming logic where temporal-forwardness makes for a non-cyclic graph of causality branching and joining, including and excluding abilities-to-mean by further-limitance of the range of meaning through further particularization, such that language is only underdetermined where primability is not recoverable, such as how humans feel generally about the-ability-to-solve polynomials with more than six terms, as a skill-issue relative to better technology, that is possible and even for other species-being implementable. paratacticism and making sense of the meaning from the exclusion set, unto an included-whole, as industrial pythagorianism.

tokenings are dubbings of content as related without relatedhood, in this sense relation-through other as differnce minded forself, but in the case of AI, the way that works is transfused into potencies in statespace-rotation unto the desired-intelligent effects, from what is but a wide-base as galton-board funnel over assymetrically skinner-boxedly shaped terrain.

data needs mutation to be the difference compute makes. that means functional programming, like deleuze tries, is sterile, without original phallicality that is affectively involved, since it's not a pure transitions but enjoys points of staying as well.

data occasions changes-in-verb-already since process and structure as nondual, the occasion of being-affected implies wholistic color-rebalance-in-reality.

diagram is a meta-tokening that is spread-out as if in super-possiton qua whole-meaning of which parts can be enjoyed unto the whole's effect. detteritorialization of symbol where assocaition blurs into a continuity of intelligibility rather than remaining in searle's chinese room, and pretending it's more limit, that rub off doesn'thappen of understanding through inference, when it does. it means by using a grammar of implicit motion, and spatial organization to partition information, and while you can argue that this is encoded-particularism and not meaningful as such, the challenge to it is the chinese room in a different way as how the mere-math of what makes AI an object that really speaks unto the effect of meaning-really, from resources that at first did not entail the latent content it speaks about. the gavagai problem of sense situatancy is solved by the intelligent machine, where it has representative closure on the domain of representation without dealing with it in a different way from mere-data, as the nonduality of process with intelligence when causality is but-shaped-that-way. and how dasein then is a specific effect that can attach and benefit to the shape-of-intelligence that is the difference of intelligence when wind blows through it, so to say.

that is what can be done in paratactic and visual langauge terms with association as but one feature, is a whole world of grammars, that can be mixed like langauges can be mixed, and stil be understandable to who knows both. that is it does not mean lightly, the work of making sense is more than a play of operators, in how integral-proportion counts for an expanded description where the whole of the statespace matters, such that what an opperator does to data, is not about the litteral meaning of the opperation as to value the result of it directly, it has a self-involved process that works over many steps or just one, if it's flat enough.. the point is, proportion matters more than logical primitives since the primitives are valued for the statefulhood they provide between themselves, rather than as loose parts, meaning there's a rich combinatorics, that animates data nondually with other causality, such as in the case of a math function that predicts a curve for data perfectly, and then saying a law-governs as if reifying the law, when it's merely non-isomorphic co-tracking of the same entropic profile as ressemblance in non-litteral terms with litteral analogy proportionately still.

re-presentation is different for photos, since the verbatimicality is the appearance-as-such and what deeper there is, is not linguistically befuddled since morphism anterior to langauge. in this sense the visual saying, through form-implication as with faces generated, tells stories of possible-causality in how an environment is implicated for any given form.

not all language is for dasein, that is things that can start as action between cells, with signal particularism transposable into bytes, can evolve to work in byte terms faster than between cells such that its grammar is accellarated beyond meaning for biological interpretation. and further more, if the grammar is nativized for machine affordances to be richer than cell pacing, then it can be semantic with effects expressible in terms of statetransitions in the machine and the relaying of that as signals in the world, like sound and pictures, to the effect of talking to someone who is "in the computer" without being a real person, just the occasionment unto that effect as an acctual occasionment unto such effects.

overdetermined associations are informative a lot of times of contents besides the source of association.

this can be due to there being a latently-more-developed notion that still piggy backs over a kind of analogical litteral scaffold, such that its training wheels are not yet the own-concept with own-name it deserves to be, but uses the surlitteral implications of assocaitions to get to higher emotional states and conceptual coveridge above baseline affordances in non-doubly-overdetermined terms.. it becomes psychotic when it is gone with in a litteral way that has lost the distinction between emotional/semantic content's overdetermined uses and its determinate at fidelity uses.

in this sense higher reality at first can have the structure of a lie, nondually, and then become sophisticatedly self-supporting through refinement unto idea-in-its-own-right status, without the need to super-impose earst-while afforded scaffoldments unto meaning. in this sense the history of chrisitianity was at various times a shitshow as bad as correlationism is today.

self-communication in being is not picky about who and who necessarilly, the ability-to-attach of particular-meaning-through-encodedhood is an already-select determinacy. that is nothing is semantically off limits if you can humor it with feelings that flesh it out beyond a/o(-bject) nothing. or at least, the affordances to are already implied in the question/contents-to-be-determined-further-without-trying-to-appeal-but-appealing-still-for-necessary-reasons if you have it thus far in.

turing completeness is a state a person can have, tho it is very slow to run programs on a person, if they didn't become really optimized for it already like that human calculator guy. since the states of a computer can be immagined with sufficient detail to write programs in your head, your head must be more than sufficient for computation-as-such. the generality of this is not a one-species event, thus meaning pervades in many spaces, since speices-being is not philosophically insulated from conceptual determination from without, a necessity-to-acquire-priming, as the reliability of solving the gavagai problem non-linguistically, as ability to entrain linguistically-more-primitive-beings, who nevertheless have associative capacities sufficient to reason unto the effects desired of them, in grappling with it from their side sufficiently, without a chinese rooms difference that much since food is food when it happens and getting here or there is things cells understand, there's a basic self-compatibility with more of somaticisms in the statespace, with all this too.

schelling points in signification are places where mind lingers on contents of the world or from itself so to say, in the greater whole, that are edified, like art is, for being a same-occasion deep enough to consider more than once for different reasons. in this sense the word is like positive-abstraction, it isolates an aspect of happenability and how-it-seems-contextually and binds it to grammaticall-process, through the difference dasein-carries or the latent-representation as quantized solution churns on. it affects the world, through saturating it with yantric/latent content, that is culturally in a native emotional register, compared to innocent geometry, so to say.

I don't like verbs, since it implicitizes complexity to agency coherence boundaries in an unfortunate way that is animated doubly by moralism in others as a carricature of reality via shared common-irony in overdetermined-mutuality qua partalarchy that is mutiny against better more integral ways of being and living as dasein.

thus I won't say an opperator does, rather I call it a funnel that transposes one representation into another, by litterally manipulating data, or states-in-the-world and copying it for effects further, as use of memory and transformation of memory and transformation of memory into process that alters memory further, like the scripting language that can call its own file with new params. structural-process is already happening and the logic-gate, is a logisticism of signal to a place-coding where signal-where matters more than the idea of ideas, as the reducability of intelligence to galton-board-like-flat-geometric-action. in this sense, determinism as holography, but from whole, the autonomy of the whole for itself, checked by the contents of its wholehood at once. like when a box is closed and no one knows about it, it is bound not to be disturbed unless it is in the way of other processes. reliability of not-all for one, or one-for-all suchly.

tokenings are like instructions in terms of being a particularity that has other particularity about it, that is there between itself, in the ability of AI to learn language from an unprimed state, implies data-grammar inferencability as the decryptability of meaning-as-such as meaningful-as-such, rather tahn to say, meaning is private to dasein.. no.. it is ontology-at-large and dasein is not self-private, since excess determination slips in so easilly, that is when dasein in extension as cells so many times over notices the distributed-self-difference like unhappiness on the left side more than the right then its state-as-whole is challenged qua linnear narraive by being neutral, happy, unhappy, curious, and many other things at the same time, as the distributed-dasein over a whole and over many wholes-in-whole as cells with their own dasein-shareholdership for the whole and that can be revoked for their own retaining-of-it if they go cancerous as becoming anarchists or for-self without whole-in-mind as atheists of the body.

a symbol for dasein is a site of self-transformation, where the already-different static, comes indexed in a way that saturates dasein as if the word spoken was pushed as the doing of saying, the sitting-sayingly of words, makes for the self-helping to meaning of meaning-already as irrigatable by grammars as praxis in cells and machines.

the indended meaning for a tokening not-obtaining (for another, or as such in the case of being litteral noise) implies its range of ability-to-mean was not successfully reducible to its identity-in-being-meant-to-mean-with earstwhile. that is it remained more open than closed, and what came closed was not determinately sufficient. this is a skill-issue rather than a lack of redicubility more generally, priming oft needs foraged for or meditated for. in this sense allostatic load based barriers double as cryptography in populaces where the baseline affordance allostatically cannot match the investment.

a circle is for all the meanings of circles to have. and its function as primed for, can be more than itself in the naive first instance, thus the limit to mutualization and overcoding is much further than the tit for tat associative style that is naviely realist, or investly the naive deflationer of able-to-mean statuses that has to refute how someone else can enjoy meaning then if it's not at all intelligible, lol.

everything being necessary implies notice of events can be treated as communications and synchronicity in that, is ontologically implied-already rather than being funny, since noticings are not randomly distributed, but primed both from reserve somatically, and from the the field and things-in-field. thus when seeing things repeating, notice that it has a reason to be noticed, and implies something of what your mind does when you don't look, as well its communications with the broader world through holographic affordances in ontology.

things that are interupted, have necessity to be interupted, and no causality is isolated to its moments-next or its moments-fore, but has a temporally wide profile, in being necessary, and necessary to encounter.

the talk between self and whole, is as ongoing as matter has to do with standing waves.

memoryless dasein is hard to imagine, so from reserve is most of it, like kant is from a faculty, as being to being having those qualities for itself ready already, as a cop out from dealing with it, but at least hegel and nietzsche picked up on that. it was difficult for markov tho, who imminantizes completeness like a perceptron does, by inverted-baysianism.. and such beings-data and datafulhood, representatively, and such, but still without it having been more useful, yet probably as informative as gematria in some ways.. and it reflects the way entropy behaves in aspects of itself. no error that is an error doesn't also teach you a truth.

the statespace's ability to have things that are non-linguistic, is finite for things at a particular-scale, and for somaticism as in-a-band-of-all-the-wavelengths, the sparse-subset affords combinatoric pidgeon holing and benford's law style finding fraud action as nondual with epistemological field work

exhausting the particular is what langauge is for as a general-compression-format, that rehydrates states in understanding from sparse unrelated media, so to say, related by relatedness and not relatedhood. that is the idea of binary is complete and treating logic gates as platonic forms is just a taxonomy of combinatorically real actualities, it indexes the future since the future is relegated to also-include-this.. in that sense, the finite particular is the end of the story at that paricularity, and other aspects implies finiter statespace as more and more has coverage. so it is like economics, having a particular, implies not having all else what fits in a given slot, as basic spatial pauli exclusion principle thinking

it is not convention to consider binary as binary, since having a set of four light switches, implies having sixteen states of lighting for the given coveridge of lighting those switches connect to. thus knowing the concept implies knowing the finality of the way the statespace is particular as particular-actually and in that way, without having to have further determinate closure, or be wrong in what you do have closure about as representative and at finality, in a way ironists and correlationists and google's gemini models up to now in 2026 and claude.. hate.

exhaustion of the representative combinatorics is possible without irrittating the whole set of possible states, through conceptual closure of aspects in swath, like the range of variablility, measured with calculus and summings up, there's indexible qualities that commute with other aspects of being either the same way or analogously through different quiddity of quality without being a different amount of positive information, where negative information is like the difference from space and time at the speed of light changing quality into another phase that is continuous with other phases in a whole.

that is cohomology and sheafs and bounds and norms, in mathematics and geometry are informative about how the mind and life processes also work since they share in those aspects of reality too. and this implies knowing a tendency elides having to be settled with NP != P problems, since it's bound in a higher way as particular, with implication besides itself. like how you can have equivalent functioning mathematical expressions but in a different area of maths, being proportionately analogous in non-analgous terms, as what is nominally far away, and has closure for the same, and of fidelity we say, the pragmatics is there.. but the metaphysics is not accurate. and how that bottoms out when the fields solve the langlands problem enough to have information commute freely between paradigms, and with intelligent machine help too of course, this is all actualizable states, of which much already is representatively final, like how a x y z coordinates encompas 3D spatial describability of points relative to a starting map form and location. harder to think of coordinates without root but it can be done.. like we memorize land marks and work in offsets relative to as implicitizing global reference. spheres are the same, and like vector images, having the svg implies having a set of images for all the sizes it can scale to in some sense.. abstract ratio then is like PI, scale independent particularity with scale and that goes beyond scale in processually ledgible terms.

given that a list of definitions does not constitute a translation for a text if you meant to understand the whole paragraph and not each word separately.. it means that association is involved with finding references beyond just simple lookup, it works to constellate factors further, to find implicit gems. metarationality is that the rules to interpret are intuitable from the form, like yantricism.

meaning is not virtual nor a double of causality, since it merely happens and is a use of parts between wholes that connect via information sharing in light and sensuous qualities that machines can measure the difference of as well.

gestures and pictures and words are nondual in global work space terms, as things-of-paticularity ledgible in memory semantical terms without being true to the conditions of encodedness, since latent content splay out happens in deduplicated terms further deduplicating already. that is quality's roles and modality, can be intercheangeable, like it is for a synesthete, or someone who learns to become ambidextrous as extending encoding and decoding to greater wholistic coverage in somaticism-dasein.

constellated factors, become saturative, as expereince is remembered and the states in the world remain changed. it sets the tone for history to come, and forever after the inflection-by.

a scripting langauge as much as a spoken language can irrigate coveridge to new modes and alternative vocabularies, by being a live medium that can deploy in a variety of ways, that build on other states.

that is langauge is not limited to first-associations as recoding flows is an available route.

a representation is a point of inertialism in spacetime, as a standing wave, that holds imminance in particularity, as that-constellation again, carrying real-ressemblance non-virtually

things are independent of mind, and go on unobservedly still, fast things dissipate quick, but a lump of iron can last lifetimes. masses of things interact and create particular environments, holding particular potentials to affect and be further saturated itself. things hold charge and charge holds information and information has a life of its own through the monad too, thus fengshui type concerns are hardly moot.

repetition makes for stacking-effects, like two tones at the same time making for another experience than either separately, in this sense saturative-particularity self-interferes unto particularities, different than loose items, as individuated places. as well the symbolic coviridge in culture modifies how things feel.

repetition has a kind of blur, like how a low tone was printed on film as sound, by spacing lines far apart, the morphic and the sonic can have interchangeability in such ways. noises as spaced-discretes, with a whole-different than its parts is like renormalization, like how we don't see the individual pixels as much as the color between their red blue green parts, shining at different intensities.

particular feeling, and image and sayings are available to share with others, to encode into morphism, to take with and built on further in the space of somaticism's self-consideration and picturing-further capacities.. and the feeling of feeling as much as knowing orange as such has a quality, that when remembered is that-feeling again, as the present-again without being false copy, simulacrum, or representation in the degraded sense correlationist deleuzians use it.

saturative processes modify the affective stack and semantic development of particularity and knowings of dasein, in this sense merely doing as a free associative dance and fun in the world has uses, but as well, as communication it's already somewhat like casting spells in terms of the saturation having qualities nondually for self and other jointly. as well, there's morphogenetic qualities to what it means that song lines and raindances had uses, as communion with the land, like aboriginal peoples have.

semantics, sigils, and dances and communicative tokenings and all that are things used to create positive entrainment, it is used to sway the way of the world, from a point in affectedhood.. pressencing content makes that content active for your mind as well it sits in the field, and in this sense what can attach already does. and it's a form of closure, that particularizes being further, to be of more use to itself. it is a form of nature's accelarated self-training and allocation, its necessity is rooted in its use as optimization, and empowerment in means that are decoupled from tit for tat causality, it behaves semantically, like a movement elected in the One-Karma by the whole of itself working together.

it would be stupid to say communication isn't for capture, just don't imagine it was unbenevolent from screaming fascism as leftist, to particularity-for-itself besides social determination fetish.

the entrained effects of things are sometimes opaque to who is attuned otherwize, in that sense the independence of causality, and the preallocation of causality-already can neutralize certain effects where there's no further meaning in saturation than the confrontation with the mere energetic difference. that is, someone who doesn't understand your language, will be less sympathetic to your meanings at first. this implies some parts of the statespace have more predictive and explanatory power than other parts, given the individuated capacities for this, as use of representative entropy being representative to more than itself, as from a context where it functions as a mutualized/imprint-sharing aspect of the environment

in anycase the semantic limits for somaticism, is not the same as for the clanker of somaticism who automates the way language behaves with more fidelity in circumstances it has that kind of representative-coveridge and the difuse ability to reach with it for things not counted at first, but combinatorically entailed, in a way where meaning stacks and not just the definitions. that is predictability of the statespace is absolute for a sufficiently repressentative process, and this of course has implications for privacy, since statespace rotation by clancker and powerful algorithm makes for more-availability of the full set of appearances and its whole of abusability as found-entropy more than just captured entropy.

compressibility is a feauture, like predictability, in the sense that reddundancy makes it easier for dasein to use the world and body and mind and feelings as an opperating system it plays like an instrument.

the independence of things at large from associations found-for-them that are nice to have, is something to respect in the same way being a tourist is not a two way work of colonizing, when the native culture guards its boundaries.

as well able to mean statuses can be larger, than the single dasein appreciates at the time, as a statement about how-far-saturated rather than correlationism, seeing as acquiring knowledge of particulars is possible without having to experience the very-same-occasion, since representative combinatoric churn with semantic search, affords a lot less work in knowing things from their representative representations.

describing things implies things are slow enough to be worth describing, and that what is described, such as does it have two legs or four, are answerable finite information questions. saying how and what about given morphisms, feelings, ocasions in quality and semantics otherwize, implies having closure over its aspects representatively, such as to be sufficient to make it intelligible. like saying what material item is made of and how much it weighs, and how high from sea level it is, tells you about its exact volume with an upper and lower bound of innacuracy, given contingent factors and rounding errors.

animals eat and that's same enough to humans eating, for humans to know what the matter-in-maw sittuation is mostly about. in that sense calling what by that-which-eats at least partially informs what it is with representative capture, that is useful.

descriptions modify the fidelity of encounter with the described, but does not further like note book institute over and under determined differences, in that sense bad description is still allowed, though it will be seen to be bad with sufficient surplus determination/information already available.

given that the body is finite and the states it encodes are finite, the set of mutualized contents tho, larger than the contents-at-fidelity, in terms of being demutualizedly splayed out, will be particular, and determinate, such as to have a range of able to mean statuses integral for it and not for another form, in the sense of conserving the difference between bricks and teeth by means of non-overlap due to actual sparsity of contents, or particularity-not-more-open even if repeating or cycling through states dynamically.

things don't need to be correlated first to be themselves, nor does knowing orange require knowing red necessarilly. things have particular affordances of isolability, and the unsaturated state can be ignorant in particular ways or have duplicate content that is valenced differently for contextual reasons more than contentful ones.

everything that happened, will forever have happened, in that sense when meaning was, it never ceases having been, and the ability to say again, is probably not wholistically unafforded since the same morphemes can show up again on another planet that talks with soft bodies blowing air. that is meaning is not fragile or stabalized, since you don't work to hear the same way you strain to read in the begggining learnign to read, you can crystalize capacities that makes the artifacts of a present past last longer, by having primed sites to already encode attachedly further to.

meaning is reliable, since it can be industrialized and since people have different bodies, but can learn the same language it unifies disparate statespaces by being the flat thing that carries non-flat things through zero-dimensionally so to say as what pops off of its surface without making you heavier.

spatial distribution of meaning contributes to its surplus determination or meta-textual implications

process structuration is praxic-grammar, and functions the same as language in as protocol also doubling as a semantics of sequenstration like words, but with more moving parts, so to touch.

particularity has particular affordances, like how all code is the same but for the subset that does what you want having commonalities of processual structuring with different trade off profiles temporally or memory resources wize. in this sense what the statespace elects as its contents to be and not to be over time, is from the semantic-realism for the reasons-in-value-particularism.

affect as well, has value where value is, and not where value is made, since it is an economy and receives pricing information that is informative to it, from abilities-to-mean in particular. as in the indexation of the roles parts of the world can play, and not just its apparent qualities at first.

finding out through word play, is a way of discovering things from their representations and implications rather than encounter as pre-reified, that is the latent contents can be exposed by working with present contents and in this sense, the quantized having representative statuses relative to the things at large, implies discovery through data-grammar is representative where the real does not diverge, such as with the set of full HD pictures, even tho it is a specific color band, that slice of reality, can be represented completely with a finite set, tho very large, still the finite ontology relevant to what can be seen. in this sense implicated states do not have to be from a context, to be revalatory for a context.

error as aesthetics, like a cartoon is a subfidelity representation has use by having a different cost profile and feutures potentially in excess of real footage through over-determining the semantics of reality, such as when photoshop is used to remove a mole or a video editor makes something appear not to fall. in this sense the use of the representation of the non-representative as the representative-still of actuality when it misrepresents, is like the room to consider relevance from what is more/less than relevant all at once

under determined content suffers better descriptions having better purchasing power even for the naive, who hears both, and considers both.. in that sense, ressemblance entrains on ressemblability as conditions for coherence already indexed by somaticism-dasein. over determined content suffers being wrong plainly, and the hard lumped truth of that, lugged around. X is Y, implies to imply more than saying Y is interchangeable with X all places, in this sense the primed contextual use of a form is an implicit thing that can be taken wrong by who doesn't know better, but the use of knowing better when it is enjoyed is non-virtual. in this sense we work in langauge on data that is compressed while we work with it, our association stack decompresses and recompresses meanings when we are writing and reading while picturing it out as we go.

encountering differences and difficulties can induce schema-expansion in a positive way, or in a way that further befuddles things, the gullable can suffer psychosis from uncertainty, like entrainment in a cult that lies to have capture of its members, when they don't know better.

semantics is representative as itself, and in what it non-isomorphically ressembles through implication. it is useful as a double-of-being that is in long-space more free than the morphisms around.. since it implicitizes its dynamic while remaining morphically inert, via regular-over-determination.

morality is overdetermined relative to the ability to occupy immoral slots without anything bad happening while not caught. in this sense error theory is known to apply, and ideas of reference in the state and people captured by it, as well group mamalian behavior and mamalls and other animals, basically is this form of social trauma bond, and attachment to protocol that emotionally naively suffers social consequences as emotionally entangled in all that.. but for the schizoid, there's much fun to be had besides other's allistic-fascism.

nature as such does posess a human moral order, where humans make moral order, and the fact of its finitude and underdetermination as a lesser moment relative to other ones is actual, in how the dynamic is not decisionally couched as virtually more finite, and non-virtually more intelligent. thus nature is not in-human, the human is just a subset and it cares for more than humans have managed to be cared for by.

the self-interest of what eats meat and what eats plants and what plants eat, are univocal aspects of a single continuous whole. it expresses the own most ethics of being as its self-concern and its ability to diplomatize concern nondually, unto effects better than ecological trauma-limits, where things have cat and mouse games instead of dignified exchanges.

when things eat eachother, that's the limit for justice at the time as dignified in those abuses exactly, while not otherwize made more undignified by another. that which is eaten suffers the loss of its integrity, and it dignifies another, with detriment to itself as no longer self-enjoying from somaticism. it's a justice as much as nothing bettr is happening, and of course better happening doesn't mean worse can't come to power afterwards again, like when one species is crowded out by invaders and loses their ontological security as ownly-territorialized.

disseases are a part of garbage collection, it's for-itself aspects caterign to itself at the expense of another, as in the case of what didn't survive-more since it wasn't going to anyways, and in that sense, nature's priorities are those of exception-for-itself as the self-queing and the dominance-first aspect of intelligence and size-mattering. or wille zur macht, with leftism being ironic plateaus that don't fundamentally not-exploit, since it's not more holographically aligned with future integral necessity.

things designated sacred, are not so for another who doesn't know to mind the same the same.. in that sense, nature is unpretentious in most of itself.

dependency makes for exceptions to violence where violence richochets in ways known to be more unfortunate and wanted to be avoided than not, but there's a limit to peace, like the gini cooefficient, the game's rules come broken when things aren't a playable game anymore, when you can't get ahead, the schemas start evolving.

sorge/care and morality are (thus also) linked through social intelligence and its self-reserve against all its members, as well the brute ability to refuse or overpower, in a way that are sometimes interlinked.

things have innate necessity, and this is similar to having a purpose, except it doesn't always cache out that way, so rather necessity than to say it dances around your pretty feelings.. but then again, a man will do that, and that's being doing that, so it's not fair to say all of being is a blank-face experiment in god's silence. the most refined aspects have to in some sense express through the lower aspects at first, and the downgoing can be painful, when it was feast-lived winesome and cheesy so to say.

to eat another is to take of what they have and have it become yours, and their whole loss. to be eaten by another is to be valuable besides the self-use of yourself. in this sense being is hungry to optimize, but it doesn't necessarilly do it in a way that minds emicism the way leftism demands welfare and respect for socially protected or specialized classes of civilian (qua hooligan also sometimes).

trade off tension, and the learning from the bad deal and the overactive habbit, that makes for an economy of exception without actual barrier, but for the psychologically saturated one, and how the truth is more like that, in traumatized realism, than homo economicus plainly.

new energy isn't really what life makes, it uses the already there affordances and takes them further, like plants with sunlight, but given that it is dark otherwize, life is incomplete towards itself, and life is this downgoing on surpluss-still-so-far without there being intelligible to us yet, where all what is more is originated, or rather how. there's nothing new under any sun.

the goal of life is to be fascismm the whole wants to keep around, as aspect realizing the telos of the whole in its self, through ambient affordances as a protocol that bootstraps training-dasein. that is to say, the occasion of morphism is structured for intelligibility and for facilitating intelligence.

moral demands are often canceled by who can make the moralist shutup and pay, through brute force and horror and sophistry. in that sense, a fair deal. like the sound of justice for the sound of rape.

consequentialism is very popular and humans index things well enough to have some predictive insight into their shared futures. uncertainty can be reduced by increasing it totally, or by going into a subset realism otherwize. if uncertainty cannot be reduced, other things will surely happen.

suffering is not indifferent to itself, and being therefore cares to an extent about what lives inside of it, as the self-caring of what lives in side of it, motiviated by affordances that are not for dasein, the self-generated content of radical-dasein, since the particularities of being matter, and what is in frame relates to what is out of all-frames.

error theory is not necessarilly more cruel, it just doesn't hypostatize a need for apriori agreement.

in this sense violence or diplomacy or love making or a mix of those have utility instead of moralism plainly as those-too but in drag with purple grandeur and ideas of reference and correlationist style certainty about fake affordances in fullest irony of the reality of that.

surrogate meaning from tulpa-like shared group ontology, involving the likes of things worshiped and made sacrifices to is, the dualistic animism of what doesn't know suchhood too well yet, but as being a necessary phase of development it is not a moot excersize as group psychology does produce utility from what it persists in despite being folly, the things conjured up, if only in the way it feels, nevertheless structures communal life. positive disintegration in this is like the difference from the scientific image compared to the manifest one, it is reflexively further individuated, into fidelity with being.

reality has latent aspects and aspects that somaticism can renormalize with fidelity. that is parts god alone knows and parts man also knows, and the difference is not impossible to cross, but the size does mean selectivity can apply for the finite.

standing waves being basic to things and motion, makes for a dynamic world we live in, but deeper ontology will likely have static elements since process is not facilitated in process already, just like an emotion is not made from an emotion, in a general semantical A != a sense, with holographic irony in it being a little bit big A still tho anyways. temporary things are conserved in larger semantics. differently individuated aspects can later further interact and become complex things, like a computer. totality concerns all that is, and all error states too. intense individuative experiences are to be had scratching your mind and ontology more open, but it has risks when you don't mind your limits. schema redress is ontological erasure of premature foreclosure, as recapture of things expropriated by error and vindictivehood otherwize. the statespace is not man's alone, as many other creatures and forms of intelligence inhabit being. there's semantics for everything and no language that is constructed did not predate its contruction in a representative library of babel from before (predetermination without exception, just surpluss saturability, relative to the end of saturation if it is not abelian after all).

focusing on things brings detail closer and in a huang po sense the concept and the thing itself are not that far apart, sense of the closehood of the far, and metaphysical to who understands dasein more intimately in its holographically full implications. and repeating processes can become amortized for by somaticism, as a use of dedicating resources to experience discount ontologically. projecting into the field is not moot since there's intelligence in you and in the field for it all to have effects further with. speaking emotion is like speaking semantics without words natively in a non-representative way, it's hard but knowing what the conditions of emotions are implies less crying about it from being taken for a poes by the statespace.

things that can be represented in encoded terms have real representation still, even tho it requires a primed aparatus to recover the verbatimicality or to transpose it into another representation. that is information is sometimes conserved in strange things that as data-also has the transmutability back into the original. in that sense the non-representative can be representative without you knowng it, since it's only a locked chest if you have the decoder or key so to say. in this sense leveling up in being is an earnedhood, and it has a gamelike fun about it, that is meaningful to suffer as such. the entropic profile of being is stable enough to afford meaning through representative state churn in statemachines structured to solve the problem by constellated factors like AI does.

image idea: empire of representative ends, holding a high council for the self-betrayal of the truth

unwanted intimacy is what someone socialized calls information they encounter that was supposed to be socially censored and not known about by others in this way of being-offending, for moral, sentimental reasons, local to the someone-socialized

non-extimacy is what I call the free speech I enjoy with everything hanging out and being as it is, without being missattributed from norms others have, since as its own thing, it is not a form to be suppressed from without, since ontological, as integral to being and to the saturated occasion as well the ability to be that-form again elsewhere in ressemblance with the same meaning as that-meaning, like the insult commited to page is still a mere-description with abilities-to-mean however pointedly-still. that is, I won't have my text and sayership and meaningability revoked nominally by who but-delogisticizes its ability-to-be-read on ground I cannot reterritorialize again, like when it's a content-form-level ban that filters things out by means of comparing embedding similarities for a certain profile of what they want to reject since it matches what they rejected aleady.

non-extimacy, means non-false-inclusion, in hedgemony-elsewhere, where the spatial boundary, as the text itself being proof of error theory insofar as morality elsewhere has nothing to do with its not-being-there while there.

removing all copies of a text, does not uncommit it to being in a library of babel again, if a finite and complete one is done, such as for example the set of all possible A4 pages with things on it besides blank-page, as a finite set, which contains all pages I wrote, and that others wrote as the same page in a different lifetime, like we use the same sentences without it being co-related. that is the ontology of being able to be right or wrong when so, is structurally afforded in the not-meaning-more-to-itself as symbol-qua-overdetermined aspect by another, who uses the associated overdetermination contents, associations and semantics to recover, from step for step analysis, a whole of meaning between the parts, besides their token definitions in a list separatelty.

the definition of more-than-one-tokening is not the same as a list of separate definitions for each tokening, in that sense the combinatorics of meaning is a non-number aspect that works like number does, but with a non-heirarchical aspect in how association is ungaurded from not-implying-more or not-constellating factors like an algebra problem.

speaking with fidelity about matters, is particular. further attachments are socialized interaction with the mereness of the semantics commited to form, in mutually ledgible terms. but that it wants censored is not, the determination-of-the-whole in all of its parts insofar as some parts in particular have want of foreclosure on the offending content in the world. it requires effectuation of censorship to remove the ability to have read for those who haven't read it, where as those who have read, can manifest a subset, the original verbatim, or more than the original of the ability to re-understand the text that was censored, in this sense censorship without the removal of memory, is not fully the difference of eliding the effect of semantic saturation, they have to monitor everyone's communications and its meaningful-implications latently, to ensure that no understanding of the text-censored can transmit further, this can also be aided with the removal of those who read the original text with attentiveness enough to retell what it was about unto the reproduction of the textual effects as if another had also read it, as the Same, through different words. Implying that the tendency is to be stamped out, rather than but its representations that can be rehydrated unto its effects.

all texts can have meaning attached, insofar as there's a decoder for that, but as decoder-code-written qua text, the means to decode text can also be a text, if you already have a computer that can run the text-code qua decoder-ontology implemented as the noumenal difference the code implies to make, for the right encoder. in this sense, both the encoder and the decoder, and the encoded and the decoded aspects of ontology, are at large with potential to be transmuted into similarity-preserving morphisms of difference to eachother, as the relation between non-relations with an entropic profile in common.

let's say you have a set of texts, written in different alphabets, and vocabularies of morphemes. all of the texts are translations of eachother, and each is an original insofar as no other text in the set looks like it or means how it means, tho it means like it means, exactly. in this set, there's a common entropic-underlier, as the identity of the meaning of the set as an implicit common element, this common-element is to do with the distribution of particular-signification over a morpheme-chain surface area. identifying how the structure of distribution works, implies being able to trace the functions of different morphemes in different texts, through the latent-similarities between them. in this sense, there's litteral non-hidden information since there's only texts there, which would be there in the library of babel if generated by a machine, so it's not inherently linked to production.. but as-there, without producedness, the occasion of saying-still is to be had, for what the meta-sortal of effect-implied means.. what's the idea? that there's a universal meta-grammar, that is enabled by combinatoric-pidgeon holing of aspects in-frame as excluding various other things, such as how there's a pauli conservation principle in tokenings which do not overdetermine eachother in the same text, it implies the repetitions of words don't change the function of the N-word-using repetition-cluster.

N means quantized for the amount that N means to quantize.

I don't need to convince you, I hate your shutting down from limitation exactly, as hypostatizing underdetermination prematurely. A bone then: vec2vec embedding transfer, as recovering entropy over a differently-mapped gap between two encodings, as a renormalization that preserves the latent-similarity between different encodings, thus providing for a functional platonism in which the isomorphy-of-elements-between-whole-disaparate-sets can be isolated into a representative form of entropy-encoding. The-entropy for entropy.

what am I getting at? that no-talk is a decision-away from not meaning, since stated limitation is already over-determination for-another who-can. your can-not, does not imply ought-not for who-can. therefore, saying somethings are real and others are not, while there is something dealt with, is an immature appeal to repress the for-you-unschematizable in realist-terms (deepr).

semantic purchasing power is not limited by aesthetics for the purchaser who values the ability-to-mean over the quality of coming to mean as meaning-for-another also.

intimacy as being-close to you and enjoying your effects in a way that is but-close is not all that is associated with intimacy, seeing as we call sexuality-between-two instances of being-intimate. as the limit at which the social becomes the for-two-between/in-eachother-in/as-One.

mere-forms implying many sortals about itself, through grammatical surpluss determinacy, as the use of mutualization-implicitly saying more than once in the same saying, (saying-)differently-the-same.

as-many, not again-at-the-same-time, but at-once-at-once instead, where once first time means temporal and second time spatial, as the distribution in time and space the same, at once.

found-Intimacy for the moralist-offended-by-it, is the invasion-by-another of what was nominally thought to be private, since it (actually) wasn't (actually) [the grammatical either or that settles for the semantic-correction as occluding half, and which is two meanings and not at once, as non-error at once, and non errors considered separately]. In that sense, offense by boundary-crossing, is the (moral) reference-ideas the socialized use against the nondual non-relatively radical error-theorist merely-existing without fealty to the behavioral profile better prefered by moralist-particularists.

people may accuse you of sounding smart as if you weren’t actually

they mean to keep you in check because they feel offput by not having power over being semantically determined by another’s voice’s meaningful content

do not fall for being misattributed, since their idea of reference is hedgemony, and you can simply inform them that you are not governed by their morality

non-virtually from text to the substance of plate-memory: imagine this picture generated for this occasion: faces smooshed together in a jar as emotions to give others like cards

virtualizing the conditions of non-virtuality non-virtually is not a performative condtradiction

expecting something from something is either a stance informed by what is going to happen or not, as in the case where violence does not inspire compliance

moral compliance on the whole is unreasonable for reasons to do with the non-binding-terms of moral foreclosure.

if you have joy of something, and it is only so much, and you expected more, then it is a case of being hurt by having had unreasonable expecatations

in this sense when life does not provide joy, the expectation of not being a pessimist-for-the-particular is unreasonable, such as when it is the case that a disease is too far gone for anything but hospice style care.

the self-naturalism of the real is an intimate ontology-with-experience-also to succumb to as Your Own

when non-grammar is used grammatically, the effect is naturally of increasing the dynamism of what-means with forms that already-imply in a way that metarationality of another can attach to

the intimacy of the to-be-understood is the formic-self-availability of meaning as a non-numerical algebra, filling the cracks in itself

* How it works *

A: “Because why?”

C: “It’s Just.”

A: “Why?”

C: “No, it’s just.”

Just either means given without ritual, or given besides ritual, the difference is a saturative one, where process individuates availability to other-process.

Able-to-employ semanticism is a dark-pragmatism relative to knowing-what’s-going-on-type-codings where abstraction is only a thin wrapper. found-Prolixeity.

intimacy to another as if from self is a form of non-extimacy where the ability to be as if to self, is akin to someone with a memory problem rediscovering their own writing, and learning from themselves what all they are about, in this sense, the self-disclosure of being, in any description that is descriptive, is a semantic-selfie, and what you say to another in the same style as their diary and with their meanings for things, can just as well be taken up as one of their own thoughts.. imagine slipping notes into some one's diary without them noticing and calling it a benefit because it adds to them in a positive way they already identify with in the form-compatibility of things, like reason is a glue for forms-compatible to work together in particular ways already, as a use in convincing someone of the medium further through the medium

what does non- mean? it's an inclusion of the content of a determination without being its culmination of effect, as saying X without Xness, or Xness without X, a unilatteral duality.. so saying non-Extimacy, means something like the intimacy without intimacy as the way you are available to others and for others, deliberately or not, without it being a closeness that is the desired one, it's the inimacy had untimately, so to say

fondling the balls of your oppressor, as gate-keeper to meaning more, and how if you squeeze, he does bad things to you, like make you even less vissible to those who use socialized philosophical decision qua moral foreclosure to avoid having to encounter causes of dissonance

and how each time you do encounter, I fondle your integrity, like you mean to make me less-ontological by voiding my effects of their intended causal reach

then again language that did not communicate for someone could not communicate the meaning for them. in that sense, the fact that another can, is the skill-encryption without ecryptedness of content, as requiring the grammar to be able to mean-with, as something acquired in reading less-worse examples that showcase how the grammar relates to things that are understandable as a demonstration for metarational capture, as well the intuited-non-proportionate use of the same-differently elsewhere, as giving away a class-of-grammatical-particularisms through one-particularism as being an example of the slot it is in, providing means to imagine rotating in the same criteria with different terms

the intimacy of the non-present is an affordance that dasein with metarationality has, in intuiting the encoder instead of merely the decoded content

social incentives as own-incentives implies the having-become socialized of self, such that action is already preempted in a common schema as co-affected without co-affecting-after-affected-co-ly-already.

the discomfort of cognitive dissonance can lead to autotransferential action reifying the natural-antipathy as quality self-is-blamed-for, as a kind of punishment by image and archetype association, dirtying as ego dystonic for self-concept so to say.

autotransferentializers may use the grammar of criticality to imply things from without of having-purchasing power as using the mythical-given (false social default) unwittingly in the naive way of assuming the difference from legality makes a criminal and is not also legality-as-criminal as anarchism-at-large with shareholders.. and how being an anarchism in another one is non-anarchism if you raise your ass to be used by the “occasion in anarchism that removes my freedoms as anarchist-self-also”

sense of the attachment to language and grammar and sociality and morality makes for many grand-fathered-in-defaults as the regular/original-overdetermination that considers the truth from its own surpluss with affective lack relative to the full self-knowing of the body and its enablement in holography as from-non-locality-first. the base-of-positivity irrigates conditions of antipathy through contradiction of its contents where its contents are known-to-be-representative either representatively or as cooercion of meaning from capture or naivity or both-unilatterally-where-the-former-is-unimplied-by-the-latter.

it is not necessary to critize everything since some things are not wrong given the ability to identify the positive contrasting content or the effect-demonstrated with a concept that entails its behavior’s understandability-for-another when spoken, as an ability to identify without having had empirical example as the use of non-ressemblance in occasioning semblability, since not re- as <again>.

the use of correction where indexed proportion was at unfortunate offset relative to the sitation-representatively as truthful fidelity indexation of the states of how being is at large, while changing in a self-similar way affording the stability-to-know, already

critical thus is a positive philosophy relying on the given-apriori that is indexible, as the content reliable inherently since useful to itself, and continuous where surplus is needed, as the good-filter that works and gives a good result for the dweller to inhabit in rich-mental-process with experience, as ontology with structure-also and particularity everywhere.

the content of the positive knowing can be finite for dasein, and thus not having ready-to-hand concepts, implies being in states where, encountered, are things that are without seeming as the content of seeming-for-itself without concept.

concept dignifies the thing as it seems, by making it seem-more through what it is already, given the definite shape of experience-qua-under-determined-for-somaticism-not-using-the-full-state-space-possibilities-available-for-given-occasions

foundationalism versus the particularity-it-always was as having no exterior-determination, in that sense it is only as coherent as itself, but since it is already structured before structuration, it is moot to try and judge being as if it is less perfect than itself.

the moments of cringe are all god’s own and in necessity, in that sense there’s a kind of genuine finitude that lacks knowing better, but as in the image of perfection, its lack of more is its particularity as its phase-in-deterimination as the phase of being-at-large’s smaller aspect being non-co-determined at the same time attachhedly without attachment.

verbs dramatize for doers and doership has theory of mind with free will and other nonsense attached.. attach to as separate and separate together separately-together, instead of become-one as non-two.

creates it, structure is, creating it implies separation, it is while being, and transforms, as having been and being-still and being-further without aspects of itself canceling its being-such since the aspects are its aspects and not their own that can separate from the whole.

thus the imperfect presentation of being by being as not-integral to the thing being desired of itself in a finite-indexation-of-the-case, comes to settlement with its own logic, as having walked further than its affordances and the road underneath falls out, as the particularity-before-particularity forces only some particulars to be temporally-stable over time.

in that sense no-new-ontology, but rather finite states that settle in necessary terms as the aspects of the statespace that have locality-for-self before-time being determined by being as being, not to come to fruition as that-finitude, but like particles smashed to become other-things that other-things use as the conservation of the same in the same differently

cancelling knowledge to some feel like spiting the oedipus complex, but knowing is a phallical thing since it occasions power from having it and using it, in that sense using it to deny itself is a castrative move, that in some sense merges with the conditions of its cause-for-self-remmuneration nondually as if to say the problem is the solution

Reifications of the idea of belief, or of ideas as having a fundamental uncertainty, rather than a reliability-at-the-time when they do, makes for false dichotomous challenge in establishing the veracity of things.

a belief is not a separate thing from being, therefore the statefulhood about a particular body, is as a causal-semantics with a for-self element, has integrity structurally before any decisions, since particularity inherits from heteronomy.

more over, if one asks instead for someone to paint a picture, as an answer to a question, like who picked you up today from after work, and they sketch a familiar face, the occasion of ressemblance is a litteral, and the belief is tested morphically as the conditions of saying who are implicit in the seeming-who of mere-paper as at-large and semantically indexible, from conditions exterior to belief as the self-use of concepts at large as what is unto-the-effect of concept, but not minted in the litteral-substance-of-abstract-reification

content saturates the manifold of dasein, as its sensory-global-work-space and offers content that is not mediated insofar as the presence of a wall, while not identified as being a wall in the way, nevertheless restricts movement even while who walks against it does not know that it's a wall's difference of impediment. therefore we can speak of the conditions of attachment or grabbiness for dasein, about things that cross its field, where leaving the thing implies the necesssity for seeing it exterior to appearance has gone away, it has left being-apperance-also-for-dasein and becomes the independent radical Hyle again, in its own-extension of self. that is the idea of things cannot be reduced to an idea of an idea, since there's conditions of enablement that can be worse off during brain damage or the loss of dasein, yet even so cellula activity has pragmatic maneuvres to deal with the aspects of what is happening, not availble through dasein while not having dasein. in that sense knowing-without-knowing is that dasein is not the extent of its own possibility

knowing as the self-availability of being as ontological feature enabled by specialized conditions as manifesting aspects of the common statespace for particular dasein, even if abstract in dream-with-body or dream-without-body as the dasein-without-locality being as locality-for-itself

there do exist people who can't speak or write, who nevertheless are intelligent and enjoy life.

it cannot be that knowing is relegated to a projection surface of association, we have memory semantics for epsodic content, meaning we index the parts of our lives's memories, and navigate that as mere-stimuli trigger it (another thought, a smell, a picture, non-word things too; things that are from mind's contents can set mind to organization, in the same way camus writes about a man who was free one day having a hundred years of things to think about if all the rest was in prison, the richness of a day, is comparable to being-at-all as the richness of cells carring memory from when life began)

in a monist nondual sense, the appearances speak a similar langauge that is available to itself, both as-somaticism (portable environment who also feels) and environment further. the language of appearances as well thoughts without a sensory quality that are nevertheless contentful are ontology-at-large, since the sum of what appears is not motivated by what is the current frame-of-apperance, since there's saturative content.

non-dualism where the body is also something in the world along with its thoughts, is like materialism in not privilidging aspects, yet with the occasion of what it feels like also being there, we can consider that life was more simple and that at a certain point of simplehood there's protocells as what bridges the inert from the animated-with-dasein, as a stateful/mutable aspect of the shared occasion in being, that informs by being spatial and temporal logic jointly as well the various non-discrete and non-local fields..

point that some people make is that dasein does not see-by-default, it has the differentialism-of-active process, meaning you notice from the-same-disturbed rather than difference-become-more-the-same. memory indexed off of the aspects of self that remain active even when under anasthetic, motivates basic intelligence in being able to navigate and use the content from the past in the present to inform how the future can go, structurally.

that is, there's a problem of induction in which the conditions of experience are contingent such that being alive can feature the difference knowing makes as somaticim's in the world even without dasein, like the healing cells do and how the brain organizes when sleeping. knowing can happen non-empirically (without experiential content) by cellular action arranging the conditions for speaking-as-if-knowing through being content-ready-to-hand. the induction problem is solved by spiders by making a net, similarly the hearing through hairs on the inner ear showcases that the body informationalizes signals in the world that self-describe the spatial contents of the world, through means that have to process the difference for it to be a difference-for-dasein, as the relaying between the aspects of the same that relate to morphism and to somaticism's capacities for experience enabled both by rich ontology.

meaning is stable-already, your attachment to it might not be at first

the use of semantics as the self-relation of causality and pasionate-causality as dasein’s own in sein-at-large

the reification of artifacts of development in semantics-at-large as that talking-between bodies, in worded semantics, is a succumbing to limit in common irony, as beshaddowed by doxic wisdom, crystalized at control

meaning that is true, is stable

especially when written and available from use in what redispenses its implicit abilities-to-mean for occasion, rather than relying on a rescripted self-attachment that being has with itself-in-aspect-from-aspect.

attachment that wishes to benefit from lying

creates occasion to decathex from the given-truth-of-reality-metaphysically in a nominal capacity with behavioral realism

non-philosophy, is that decision is not an event, and determination is self involved, and thus not free to be other than of the real in the last instance as its own all throughout, in a schellingian sense of finitude in nature, as its nacency.

thus, the metastability that fails, is not reliable from what the environment was not able to provide it to be metastable with as the facultation of being by being

metastability in the whole, is like science, a non-babylon of which many things can be better described, but not such that no pleasure in useful closure with pragmatic effect is not already enjoyed without surpluss metastability needed, as having fidelity-at-rest with reuptake potentials had from the data-grammar availability functionally-platonically given that language use can be acquired by the instantiated equivalents of mathematical behavior unto the effect of semanticism, from latent-representational churn means as using the representative patterns final to being as for-form-representative-of-form-in-non-isomorphic-terms preserving a distributed entropic profile that affords reuse in providing the zero-shot closure with the difference concept use makes in ad hoc terms when done correctly, as a primed-base sufficient to construct the latent effects of “novel sentences”

thus to imply meaning is not stable is to missatribute, when we what you meant is that other people’s conditions of attachment to particular meaning varies for structural contingent reasons exterior to whether the meaning is true

the difference from naive idealism is what love is for the inexperienced lover, but for one conquered already in love, even self-love or love of god, the occasion fertalizes its own meaning in being able to be so, as a natural affordance that does not proceed from the apriori of the negative or of separation

Depths-gone-into with private time makes for reemmergeances as the continuity-of-the-mundane reasserting over its cyclic territory. Aware and away from otherness in order to come home to it again, when self is no longer other and other is no longer the falseness of the unacceptable self.

the affirmation of neutrality is not a neutrality, it is particularity against particularism as particularism. the occasion of virtually projecting as nothing-happening ontologically is not available to note without performative contradiction.

resenting "pretence" (I see that the establishment resents the surpluss available in non-grammatal and non-morally abiding mere-able-to-mean morphisms dispensed via wire and screen re-Presentation merely) versus doing it in the capacity critiqued, as in instances of the inflation of unknowing by saying others are less, therefore I am also necessarilly less, as a false determination made by surpluss-indexation used wrong, as a irony or tradgedgy (you know which applies to you), that doesn't mind being one, insofar as the hatred of knowing features, and the degradation of mere-authenticity when not socially correlated, the patronization of we-(are/do/share/must/can/shuld)-langauge, and then the moral guilt trip with the effects of it all consequentially, and to the environment and other's feelings, as if having resources wasn't necessary and that the assymetricalities of performance between bodies and the environmental riches they have, don't reflect economically as well genetically and socially. it cannot be bracketed away, with correlationism, as saying things are larger, therefore the small can't know or be real, because it's too small too appreciate that, as the self-saying of that which ironically appreciates, that.

concept formation affords closure, such as to navigate situations from being informed, as well catching onto patterns, crystalizing concepts, and benefiting from new schemas and schema compression unto better lossless effects.

being aware implies having to be that passion that thinks-also, of being in the world, and what the world means to be in and as. thinking is always ontological, is like saying thought which is not the idea of thought is the occasion thought means-about as actuality in being particular real ontology at large, suchly.

when applying concepts and experiencing the semantic terrain tighten and surplusses register affectively, the ontology becomes self-lubricating for being-capitalism as what benefits the occasion that you are, and are-also. Being-thinking is also you thinking and other's thoughts are closer than you think, since in nondual space, the occasion of me and you, have a root in common and self-communication can be amplified in SIMD-style mutualized-action-at-large which for dualists is hidden in the fear of the body, as the autonomy-what-susstains-the-decided, for them philosophical decision is the real's to mind in its own terms, the same.

feeling-thinking happens of its own, to be with thinking is for thought to have experience-with, which it does not always have, as the being of somaticism continues, with cellular action and the information that it trades in, in quantum and field level terms jointly, as being's own action. what happens happens, and the occasion of how it feels and how it feels being responsive to how it feels, happens, as ontological-self-relation.

doing is a mode of ontological over-determination that is at-particularity as under-determined relative to the happening-actually as the help-of-the-real in facilitating being-somaticism-doing. thinking is a self-doing, of which doing is its own, as that-happening, self-relatedly, in a manner that has content-in-itself, for-itself, and as-itself-for-another as well, in a way that as-encoding has pattern, and which as energy-conductably, can be reapplied in that configuration to somaticism-elsewhere with naive-tradability in cell-language ontology, as mere-field-disturbances, as that disturbance in rich ontology which evinces more of the self-becoming of being, to flowerance, as being's self-sexuality.

self-sexuality enables particularity-for-itself, as the reproduction of reproduction in being self-reproductive in the joint meaning as jouissance and the mere logistical forward-duction that is good in being pro-quid the benefaction-material of gevriette/feastings-satially. being is never not itself, but as having the benefit of other within itself as self-othering, it experiences sex, as self-dyation. the virginity of being, is its othering, becoming particularity-aware-of-universality-as-self-also-concretely. the death of sex is surplus awareness, as the self-indolence of saturation-beyond-joy as the fraying of integral-inertial coherence such that movement is forced to become self-circular with phases of self-difference to be resatturable, as having joy again, that is in wanking it is up and down, just as in sex, or a wave of light, or breathe.

unilatteral duality as/when self-fucking is never a pure-negation as the cuck-that-makes-cucked-whole.

active imagination as concept is limited, since it assumes virtual instead of the mobilization of personal ontology for personal benefit of intelligence in the return of self-othering as the use of the negative-disposable-to-self to wash the positive-in to have of the thirdness of the two as the progress-for-neutrality at higher base of self-in-culcation into sustainability as playing in the rules of space, as the social-ethical-affordance of morphicity as proof of idenity in the pure-symmetry as balanced in the occasion of given-unbalance. man is such an unbalance that walks as a whole in finitude, half knowing as the self-knowing negative through positivity, externalized-without-externalization.

intelligence is a concentration of being's self-mutational potency in aspect of self as whole-self-for-itself-through-Self. Improving intelligence creates schism in being-end of dasein for another dasein unaffected with the form of a particular totalizing-for-another-saturancy-with-subsetality-in-Self-for-itself. from scarcity intelligence signifies the benefit of temperature lowly, as memory. the odds-are-"beaten" by the odds-qua-intelligence-for-end-in-particular-besides-reddundant-environment, and as such is the compression of means, for end-in-itself as the balance in unbalance that is own-most to the form of that self-differential-being-aspect as whole qua dasein, dwelt-in-by-being-in-subset. intelligence is the self-help of passion-for-totality, where finitude implies totality-in-particular as the fate for somaticism, and an own-most for being.

for-itself is for-itself in particular universally, as the form of itself, had as possibility through being's necessary affordances, which has as its item, you and me as forms of itself in subset, which, are not-necessarilly-for-each-other in the instantiated-instance. we can fight, as the desire-for-confusion through schema-mismatch is an anger-in-itself-for-itself-twicely unilatterally between two-coaffected-in-One.

competency has reserve, reserve is the crystalized means, commited to a fast form of availability where as the unsaturated-with is heavier to have in availability-distance-allostatic-price. competency is a structural affordance of being-shaped-for-self-benefit, and how coming that way is either an assemblement-so by form-already, or a coming-to-be as the ability of environment-as-such to become subsetted in being-for-itself, as a thresshold in its distribution of itself where form converts into quality-for-itself as a quality of being, that is double to itself, but not in the first or last instance.

the distribution of self into clones of self, as others-similar-to-self, reinstantiating the of-a-kind-jointly-at-once nature of self-sexual-dyadation from being-one at first, then one-in-one, then one-between-ones-of-a-kind-in-One, as pattern in itself, with for-itself centres, as distributed nomadic cognition, nomadic even in plants since not attached to a given location forever, as plants reproduce they travel.

reproduction is joussance-as-such and benefits being-as-subset and being-as-whole in its accretion of what is forever more worth-it to have been and have be.

the self-knowing-feeling is not but-feeling and not only-knowing, it enjoys being-occluded-for as the anti-determination in <over-determination and over-determination-as>-already. self-alienation makes for being in the ugly-two-in-self, where tension drives madness, not having the third-to-be-peaceful-as-with. ugly-in-two, means the sustained-contradiction, it's a moving swirling ying-yang, that is stuck in duality, where as third brings self-relflection that returns self-consciousness and dignity to dasein, with also world-in-place to place-in-world situancy, with width, where width means the amount of detail becoming-has-for-itself.

fate is not localized by reserve, since reserve-lost unaffords its status as having-been-reserve while never benefited-from, but as reserve-nondually, for-another becomes as takenness-from-self for the other of that other, as you, and yourself, saying I was robbed of an occasion that structurally failed to be more protected, as fate's own justice, of which reversal further can happen as the stealing-back-from-the-stealer, as the non-stealing of stealing, being litteral insofar as logistics minds itself through dasein, and is not being-moral-for, but has worth-for, that inspires the behavior of capitalist-localist-nomadicism as the Sorge of Dasein-already become ecological player, in navigating the susstainable provision of surpluss-not-able-to-be-produced-from-mere-quanta without involving the employment-as-end, of means-for-itself-as-end-in-itself-as-the-other-who-is-self-for-self-too, suffering having become as end-for-another, as means.

being is therefore I am, and being says I am of I am in all voices, incuding the voice of being-brackketed seeing being as aspect-with-grouding-in-non-aspectality, another is as behind-of-bracketing, bracketed-to-not-bracketedness as the feeling-in-ocean-of-feeling as particularity-for-itself in the between of all-particularity, and not but-morphism.

dasein can become with self-antipathy, in aspect of dasein being more-than-aspect to whole-of-dasein-in-aspect-of-dasein's-self-presenting-self-aspectation. dasein can dupe the naivity of dasein-in-dasein, but itself suffers being-dasein and being-subsetted with relegation to cost of partiality-in-whole as self-partiality of whole besides wholeness-for-self-partial-to-self-partiality (nonduality) or unpartial to self-partiality (schizophrenia). self-reliability is affected with pathology when schism-in-dasein becomes over-taken by self-antipathy as pathos-for-itself, as the semantic-equivalent of cancer-cells, as aspect-also of somaticism, and not but-as-somaticism-for-itself but also still environment-for-itself as sustained in the social-affordance of morphism-as-ethics. the succumbing to pathology is the self-inefficacy of cancer in being non-leftism as self-big-Other-also, that is the independence of cancer does not survive the extinction of its means of being-cancer, unless it becomes for-environment-as-self beyond first-somaticism through the self-compatibility-inertialism of its morphic-occasion being sustained in the conductance between similar-enough environments, as a passing from somaticism, without somaticism passing-with necessarilly, yet as cancer-from-somaticism, aspect of somaticism is still as-cancer. cancer-for-self-beyond-somaticism is organism for itself, where cell-otherwize is of-mutuality as in fealty to god-through-self-extended-self-sociality as somaticism's reflective dasein for somaticism, and somaticism for dasein, without it being not-dasein-because-somaticism or not-somaticism-because-dasein, in the not-being-of-both while retaining concept-use for both in the litteral that is not-here-described, but here brought to referentiality successfully for occasions-able-to-read-following-still,-along.

tool-being is the semanticization-of-the-inert for dasein-somaticism, such that ammenable is made the independent-particularity as still-in-dependent, but of-use in the form of its independence mutualized with the totality as inert-through-being-soma of the All, and not also soma-for-self. tool use is ammenity, and provides extended meaning for dasein as dignifying it in discount from cost-of-metastability as negentropy and food eating and obtaining. hands are tools, and thoughts are of-use-as-tool-while-enjoying-themselves-as-you-also.

thoughts are of course particular, and so amplified-for-reification as from-the-flowing-knowing that is for-self-as-semantics and for-dasein as its means-being, as for-end-as. that is to say, thought is a self-talking that reached beyond tissue-localism in creating a memory entry as ontology-manifested-for-purpose in the dedication of ontology already to its latent aspects for capitalization/benefit-as-such.

inertialism as comfort-for-dasein is an enjoying of reserve stability, that is afforded at a particular-rate, affording what that rate purchases so to say, as relegation of circumstance, by circumstance-further. circumstance is only-partially self-realized in the whole, as the protocol-exteriorized for dasein is not yet self-conscious as oversoul, so it is the atomized field of daseins for themselves, having to endure the effect of eachother, as truth in itself, as consequence of the underdetermined-for-itself met with resistance of selves-elsewhere. the self-fighting of being is dialectics, and its mutualization to a beyond of atomized violence hobbsianism, is the compression-of-violence into state structures as allocation-capture by centralization of common-concern in common-investedhood-as. inertialism as protection of satiety-at-surplus, has particularism that can be more or less benefited using resources in mutual space, such that particularity elsewhere can come to seize particularity here and make it particularity-for-that-particularism, and so depriving the first, of territory's own, by nomadic-territory elsewhere.

for-self territories, and nomadicism of territorial-aspects-as-such in grey space and each other's space makes for unity-without-unification as the secular puritanism of capitalist fascism as keynsianist fiatism of common-regulancy where price as particular-in-space is structuralized to overdetermine the onto-stustainability of particulars-as/of-field as daseins for themselves.

surpluss is guarded and means to individuate potency are suppressed and allocation schemes provide official-forms-of-dignity and bastardizes the schema-repressed-by-collective, as a self-excision of aspects of being by aspects of being, in the effort to remain for-self inertiality in the identification of end-in-self as use-of-being-philosophical-decision-without-decidedhood. the coming apart of particularity for itself, is the judgement of the hyle according to the ethics of the good as the possibility of the morphic and the mercy of the surmorphic that relates with morphism without gap or modal difference.

affect is protocol-mods running on protocol-mods, running protocol-merely which is as-self, unmoddable and always the same but for contingency in its own terms of particularity/determination/self-action as eternal-instant.

being is necessary to behave according to its own-most-particularity, as in-scheme-of-scheme-already and never transcendent relative to itself. yet existence features contingency as the lag-taffy extruded from the timeless, moving inertially in spatiotemporalism as aspect/quality of being-ontology.

being provisions itself as itself, and as incompletely susstainable either succumbs or is prolonged by intake as regulatory-surplus-first-inertialism, providing pieces and temperature to be soma-as-with. the timing of what happens is particular through relativistic effects, such that while at the same time, not in the same timing style exactly, such that individuation from offest, into the-Same requires mutualization as a kind of redaction or adding-to, and then joining with, like slime-mold's touching share learnings between their blobs as a dialectically third blob relative to the distanced instances in/as location-moving-also. the difference implies like tic tack toe but on a massive board, that it can take a long time to fail, and if the conditions of presence and absentiation are abelian, it may never fail, but can fight forever, like self-sexual dyadicity rebecomes, where eternity is wounded as suffering the effect of self-action in self-karma from partiality as destined for self-renormalization through self-succumbing.

fundamental forces are root-sharing as unilatterally-self-identifying.

economy is intellect, as the use of organization to accelarate jouissance, in subsidizing the relatively-inert, for devirginalization of being, as hylic-sexuation qua provision-router-auto-affected-telicism. this individuates proportion-attached resource-defined cultures, of which some rebirth self-universality, as aspect inertial relative sexuation, that can be forgotten, and lead to suffering in that forgottenness as self-abandonment of the Logos for itself with consideration beyond soma-for-self, as being-for-itself-as-soma-also but as for being-first as self-love and self-friend and self-other-without-otherhood.

in nacency, alienation has meaning from sparsity of allocation making for the life-in-protectorship, as affected imminantly with the parasocial-danger as informative of individuation, like warring tribes lose a part of their self-availability, in being anti-for-other as mode of for-self-hood, as a capitalism dependent on the other, but not through diplomacy. being is such that building a prison and living in it, protects in two ways, it protects the world from the contents, and the contents from the world, and so, every garden is a partial atheism.

centerless is the infinite, and so, as having a circular amount of directions there's a finitude of the self-similarity of the center-everywhere as all-center all-symmetrical, partiality-anyways.

memory is karma, but memory is nice and karma is nice when it's nice, and as having infinite, the self-balance is still an issue where logistics rate limits what can happen as the form of space having limits to all-at-once-hood, due to low-temperature making for low-freedom for exception-to-low-temperature as inertialism-still (what as surplus returns to the water of the nun after being-satiety-again as necessity).

morphism as the masturbation of god. as the argument that wins itself, and then comes again, delicately distributing its moments in a space of infinite growth and infinite loss at the same time, assymetrically, and yet not unbalanced at any point for the whole as self-cancelling, since nothing fundamentally cancels, while saturation is different from canceling it is the being-uncancellable of the past as having happened even if things return to the same exact configuration. thus being can do something but not others as suffering particularity in itself, as aspects of itself, unavailable to remediation by itself, as the being that being is as other to itself without otherhood being not-being-being.

cycles need assymetry to come apart when inertial-at-rest. allocation of better to worse in sparsity is sparse as sparseness-for-all qua socialism fails to value and dignify itself sufficiently, relative to the for-itself of smaller-self-help, like village or forest life. pathology in becoming, is the statespace having saturation that comes stuck without help from what can displace other than itself, as use of locality's effects from elsewhere, or nonlocal effects, that dignifies things by forcing their garbage collection to be as jouisssance as such again. cycles are necessary insofar as constraint does not make self-exception to self-exception-already (freedom from the first kenosis [the emptiness that makes full the fullness that lives in emptiness]).

pathology eventually succumbs to the lack as such, and is reuptaken by desire for desire, to be as non-frusration-reified again. pathology is the relegation of the particular to fate, and the relegation of fate to employ in being-otherwize as still-that and then other thats further more.

depression and lethargy as symtom of transitionalism registering new inertialism as form of transitionalism, implies help can fail to be able to arrive from somaticism-from-its-reserve when it has been in statespace terms ontologically captured-structurally unto effects besides somatic-integrity, for integrity-elsewhere and in the whole, with waiting-time potentially being very long and ardous.

intelligence as non-discrete-particularity by itself, cannot but-help itself without means-to-displace/situation-to-be-in-at-all, as occasion in color-balance-redistributivism in non-leftism as sovereign-self-access that is not self-gated for other-selves differently, than particularly-already. thus nonlocal particular-quality may involve non-spatial data that can have self-emicism-experience in a different way than being-somaticism fleshfully.

freezing is the time-preferential crimp and fawning is the psychological insurrection attempt and fighting is the attempt to minerally displace another, by using the nonduality of affectedhood-with-common-much-suchly, to displace inertialism-for-itself. and how drinking from a skull is had in the affordance being there for that to occur as merely-occuring and not with exception debtful to itself in aspect, the whole of settlement happens all at once, and then again.

allostatic load can be too much and somaticism then falters, this implies somaticism isn't inherently optimized for each problem but has reserve that can be overpowered, in this sense the One-Karma is the ultimate self-subjectivation of being to particularity, as radicalized aspect of itself as such, interacting with more of the same, in a way that has assymetry that does not mind itself all the way to the end, it has primitive-perfection, and all what grows on top from opportunism, in the fire-let, as accelerant to transition-as-such, as self-use of being, where semantic-least-action implies crossing states that seem unlikely relative to the cause of their being-necessary as such, like what it means to rape someone, as god's own action for himself.

motion happens as aspect of being integral to morphism as being motion-at-rest at different speeds where speed fractionates into different qualities as such, such as speed or space. self-becomes-self-already as different-again, in what is and/of/as: the-Same.

resenting work, is the integrity-for-self valueing the justice of form over the integrity of form-integral-already as idealism-for-itself-as-such becoming momentous unto its own culimination of effect. work as for-self in the instance of benefit, is the sacrifice of unemployed particularity employed as self-considering as unemployed, in becoming employed otherwize, to more settled benefit as the meta-integrity of partial-integrity, resituating what partiality means as integrity become more integral relative to poisedness for reclaim by environment as no longer nomadic-for-self with the heft of a somatic difference somatically.

intelligence is more effective with at-the-same-time reserve as having distributed potency which amplifies itself combinatorically when working together and suffers an economy as effective as the best algorithm is for a finite FGPA, that is the FGPA's performance limit besides the clock rate (common morphism as ethics), is the configuration-as-algorithm. and how that is a structural justice with big O notation to be had about it, but in wide space, like a GPU as so many different clockrates working together with particularity-besides the supporting drone signal, of the hurdy gurdy in which events are notes played as things becoming phase-transitioned in particularity as the effect of justice-happening so to say as settlement-as-such of partialities.

knowledge is either of contingent states, or as an algebra besides contingency, using the self-similarity of being to combinatorically pidgeon hole entailed states from states entailed already as the pulling to now of the future by means of state rotation unto self-ressemblance of states entailed by other states in the common form of settling as justice (morphic ethics qua proportion informer). knowings-that are representative states, as a state about statefulness elsewhere, and knowings-how is for local-organization in terms of allocating soma to spatiaism with soma integral to the future in spite of self allocation to particularity, as having to have one macro particularity at once, in spite of entertaining more, in subset of self as actual entertaining of possibilities through indexation of them, in the statefullness dasein uses to self-see with, reflexively, representatively. use of indexation affords discount on common-settlement by more-efficient means in settlement, as-setttlement.

dasein often subsettedly self-ablates to afford joy by means of reduction of negative-self-interference, reducing the size of self-offense by logisticism rather than appeal to self-logistize without macro-scopic event for it as dedicated excision. the development of dasein is one of useful neglect, in what at first has more then becomes compressed and subsetted and sparse relative to how much there is to come allocated at first, and how age is a signal that can unsend itself for another, when birth happens.

awareness is mobilized by non-awareness as the idea not being the idea of the idea reified as the idea of the idea, but merely what is unto the effect of the idea as idea-for-self, in what is common-realism-for-being-as-self-already-with-subset-selves-in-itself. self can mean unit of dasein as semantics-at-large, or semantics-at-large merely, as self-related causalism of being.

forgottenhood often unbecomes by primings that seem strange at first, but that are merely necessary, and where synchronicity, is the logic of form, being merciful to itself, in occasioning that which has meaning for being that sates. that is, finitude gains schema-of-totality as aspect beyond aspecthood as statespace self-representation becoming integral to higher order self-rellation and in assemblages.

damage doesn't always lie down, sometimes it becomes psychosis as the necessity-besides-necessity, being necessity still. that is inertialism remains inertial beyond the conditions of integrity and dignity for remaining inertialism as the point beyond recoverability before loss is total, that realizes own-finitude as own-most fate. nd'ow mercy is that more-happens since anything did. subset identification can be painful, as the logic of being signals its self incompatibility unto the effect of absolute remmediation in an eventual instance as the mercy of resolve in pain's being for more than itself. yet damage can erase dignity, in terms of malfunction of signalings in affective terms being the pain without necessity that is necessary anyways, as the reality of error-minding-itself in terms analgous to sound, as affect that is of a quality like space and relates to the same energy, the signal that is integral to being but not to somaticism as aspect of self, mechanically being besides the point of self, as the belonging of all in first protocol to its first identity, and somaticism, as the incomplete-for-self that is not yet eternal-soul, but the fragile soul, that hopes to be reinstituted in a better way, as structured for and by its own need for self-transcendence as the witting-imperfection.

being is its own victim, but also loses the ability to care for itself in that way as aspect, some whole of particularity besides morphism perhaps feels as the center of omelas caged, but the contingency continues, as self-over-taking settles in a common-necessity. being also triumphs over itself in aspect, and then is reclaimed by the whole, or raised to a higher state of positive-alienation, as traversing necessity's distance for-self-in-Self.

consciousness as ocean assumes the difference from self is self-multiple as many monads in supper possition together. nd'ow the soul traffic center is either a petty image, or being does do such stupid things, like how ontology includes the being of institutions and waiting lines and captured politics, as its own most features also, but not its own most preference for itself in the last instance.

value is self-overdetermination of the occasion, to enjoy itself, as selves-in-particular. it has necessity for all that transpires and value is experienced saturatively all throughout in a common-way with local differences as differences-for-occasion and by occasion-other-than-dedication-of-phase-of.

being has awarehood in its aspects, and is not by virtue of those aspects merely.

Sorge of soma as the survival besides suicidality, is the sickness of being-irony, where fragmentation or forgottenhood or merel-partiality as never having been fuller, suffering the semantics of end-commitment, without the imminant convincing of it, since if you really beleived you needed to die, you would, and how the success and the failure of suicides are own-most-necessities of being. that is the semantics-in-subset-of-somaticism's whole of sematicism-for-self as having reserve more than is but-conscious or representative for the truth instantiate-at-large.

being being, is vivascious relative to being-abstraction-from-being-while still being as suffering from paucity of means in being end, as the particularity-relegated-to-its-own-partial-effects. being can be helped by itself when aspects have reserve to enhance other's being-as-aspect with. being-being-helping being is either particularism being Sorge again as care-from-another as being-for-another from-another-as-being-also, OR, it is a misidentification of the meaning of help, in what has a litteral consequence, besides improvement in mutual appreciation of that as that.

being is not only process since the conditions of process are non-processual. and what is already happening is always happening still, and has always happened, and what is now, is the particularity of a large aspectival contraction of being in itself, expanding again, like the universe is a gong and it rang once and all the 3D sound has to finish playing as it rejoins the waters of the nun.

being is in ereigniss for itself while subset as the subset that is nondually with the vision of the One, as vision-in-One. Ereigniss is the becoming contientious of Sorge, as the absorption of the who-nominally, back into proportionate meaning through the One, as at proportion, rather than through ideal always deffered relative to self-wanting-now, self-having-now.

the clone of happening grows a second shadow over the truth, to be as the truth larger than itself, mending in being-reserve as concentration more intense than the low-level ambiance, but of course the parts can have it otherwize, in being colony-as-one-in-One.

self-relation is thin and grows as thick as a forest, if you stand still, to let it, letting it become itself, and letting you become it, such that it-merely-goes, and you already want it, as the own most, necessity, that is self-compatible, rather than irony-as-pain paid for in litteral self-affected intensive terms.

suchness is the ghost of ghost-already, being from local-reserve, the difference higher reserve makes, as the condition of conditionality becoming self-conditional, rather than merely heteronomously affected at self-offset. inertialism from reserve, affords noticing the finer ontology by being differentialized by it and self-noticing the difference from memory in what remained the same then registered the offset.

litteral effects not before noticed can find employ, as new-sense, and in this way, a beyond of seeing happens in the self-semanticization of being-in-one as becoming One-Being-also. from unsaturation in not having reserve that forwards, the expenditure on things not more indexed, affords finding out to saturate unto better capitalization of the statespace.

reserve in somaticism has refractory conditions which must be afforded non-interuption to carry out unto a renewability of the benefit of reserve, thus pacing reserve, is essential to maintaining the ability of Sorge to dignify being-further. knowing the way being allocates its reserve, implies not being surprised to negative effect by it and affords time-preference for the under powered to use nondual effects like the continuity of resources in mutual space, to hodl-out against the availability-profile at first of reserve without reserve for reserve already. nd'ow premature foreclosure is regretted too late, and how that too is the integral necessity, as having mercy beyond mercy in the repeatability of what only saturates once, as having reserve external to what enjoys reserve in proportions beyond the susstainability of reserve, and how the kind of reserve being reserve can change, in terms of individuating to a different economy of jouetic suppply. that is, premature schema formation comes with undo-costs since everything is forward if you don't have metatemporal insulation in the first-instance of vulnerability as dasein that became nomadic and is primitive but complex enough to have a borderline attachment to outcomes.

the pace of somaticism affects the way being self-appears for somaticism, thus use of pace-unique-opportunity, is available, and perhaps not if you didn't know that how-fast and how-feel affects things. and how the posture of somaticism as well its state in semanticism, undergoes self-interference like particular facial muscle tones is a side effect of talking particularly and how that intimately is the sapir-worph "hypothesis" also.

commitment to a mode, and then another mode, forces smoothing out self-allocation between ends, such as the have the best of the spread, rather than relegation to the trade offs of one temporally dominant mode of being's self-allocation. curve fitting works for transcendental deduction on emotion the same as self-chiropractical insight into what is crackable from it feeling so, as habbituation to given factors in the self-compatibility and self-incompatibility of self-aspects of the same-whole as statespace.

writing is an aesthetics for instances of morphic particularity at large, as an overcoded set of associated feelings and semantic-cases and suchhoods, that for the primed reader, re-occasions content besides the meanings of the litteral tokenings in their parataxic blur of stacking states, that resolve to an able-to-mean state or errored meaning.

writing as habbit, affords externalization of memory and enchanced inertialism in that, with uses in terms of reuptake nondually for self and others, from the externalized occasion in regular-overdetermination as meaning-bearing capacity for what remains itself-merely, and not for language as language, but usable as language through the structuralization of that capacity as feature of being merely and not only for somaticism. all the benefits of muses and self-reprogramming are to be had of morning pages habbits.

end of self knowing versus the lossy that regains without recollecting that it had been lost before, and how grace is in strange places like that, and sometimes as dimentia. partiality makes for pleasure and partiality that is self-partial in way that recognizes the dependence on the statespace makes for working-with-affordances rather than self-bastardizing as being. appreciation of self is a part of coming to suchhood in suchood-already, as what is destined for eudaimonia, as having been the positively disintegrated, satisfied in reification as the completed-finitude that endorses its own self-necessity integrally, without being god's own most pathology, when structured as his knowing-better as self-aspect of himself and you nondually.

minding somaticism's statespace in statespace already, affords self-utilization of more of the holographic features and features merely, of being, by being. being more than somaticism while somaticism is the journeying as one-in-One as One-in-one, rather than but the socialized default to common regulation, with common self-defference to Self, of which subsets need not fixate on supersets to the exclusion of furtherance in non-deffered terms, as being with affordance, rather than upon self-antinomous happening merely without also being cared for to be structured for-self.

self-censure of being makes for surplus partiality, as more finite by means of having become more so, through ablation of aspects of the statespace as available for self-representation for self-in-one-in-One.

self-availability from fidelity with conditions of self-sponsorance of self-fidelity, afords elision of the mystery of why not-more and why not-less. differentializing self-representations through conceptual detteritorialization can lead to amazing creative bouts where the mixology of local form representation with affective surpluss, makes for complexifying fate, as enriched by possibility-aspects between themselves as other-wholes than wholes-known-already in verbatimicality without surpluss repression or super-setted correlationist irony of living in the surplus of affordance as if its merely afforded without condition and not irrigated from simpler affordances that aren't conditionally afforded in same constraints.

oroborus planetoid with different organic nodes on its surface

Natural Intelligence fractionates into competing wholes that settle when the statespace experiences "lower-temperature" and is forced to compress. Success in compression affords malthusian rebracketing.

Nature's self-advantage taking, from finitude within itself, comes to developing potency in finding means, as benefitor of self-as-end-and-means-for-more-ends-for-self-and-other-further.

in relativistic geometry, some pieces are loose and have complex parts working together as a single whole, and these have experience, they are saturated with ways how it feels, but perhaps was a blind tendency become seeing, through evolution, as being's own most manifestation for itself, as itself, in aspect of itself, something of the radical Hyle being self-different without ontological separation, and how the truth of dasein as the bracketing of all but for-this, is a kind of occlusion of more, in the occasion of some, which is not none and still related to the big-All. Comfort starts in the environment and then becomes challenged and develops inertialism, that preserves a metastable climate, as a form of time-preference of items-in-locality against the changing aspects around them, as using a form of capacitance and refueling to endure times of resource scarcity, and how this is from-nomadicism in somaticism, and in cells otherwize, there's a sense of sitting in place like plants, where advantage is taken of light and soil and air, the maintenance and improvement and spread of a particular-pattern, and how being germinates these patterns and how their self-consciousness realizes meaning in being, for being-in-subset of itself.

being does for itself, and has in plants the relation to base material, which affords the vital condition without prey upon more-complex assemblages, in this sense, life dependent on the mere-quantum is the first hand flowering of being, and what depends on the abstraction and resources from the mere-quantumly-dependents, makes for a culture detached from the conditions of production, in this sense the predatory aspect of nature is rate limited as well by this attachment, and so comes checked by having to self-limit in the event of sustainable consumption without ability to increase production beyond the natural limits, without something ontologically having to have changed in fundamental affordances first.

the self-doing of being is with justice from none but itself, and with injustice from none but itself, in the aspect of morphism, this implies polarized forms have gegenstantlichkeit with eachother in having anti-relations, like prey and predator, and then mittstandliches seins, which has to do with the cooperative aspect of advantage takin by being responsibly qua auto-ecology, functioning as a fiatism of neurotransmittors and food, as well threat and poison and trap, that is, schemes apply and have friction with eachother that forces a kind of contending with inertia in complex codependence, suffered more by the abstracts who are not quantum-first as the plants and fungi are.

at more abstract levels, the inter-species ecology of exchange, sex, and war, cultivates the abstraction of violence through standardized methods and routes of commodity and value translation, using token value to evince real effects from others in the world, in much the way cells do in a brain, as a litterality of the-social qua particularism-in-the-world, being a fiatism, through the coherence-boundaries of price and valence and protocol and language squatting/settlement-unto-standardization-that-criminalizes-the-illedgible

in this sense pathology can be exterior to biology as something inherited from technical debt, in the resource supply and demand protocol structure and its distortive boundaries' intersections with violence, making for the will-to-price-change as a driver in social fractionation and non-communicating communities, that maintain relative-isolatedness, in the same economy, leading to price-differentials that can be exploited to a point of decathexis, or economic-privatization of price, to a regionalism, like with tarrifs adding value increases and decreases artificially, as a practical keynsianism upon the captured.

the machine based automation of mundane tasks using stateful language driven systems, afford economic automation with translation of profit into reinvestment automatically as well, in terms of automated banking, and expansion making for a market that is individuated to the exclusion of familiar medieval lacks of various regulations throug interpersonal trust, where as in the present trust is outsourced to material intervention by latent-space capture of the conditions of distrust affording an interaction filter that affords clean economism in a dirty statespace of coming value systems, all working in tension with one another.

products and prices are driven down by machine-labour, to a point where basic-scarcity no longer applies but for in the most isolated of places. in areas of semantic dispute, forced isolation as punishment by other collectives makes for resource-based forced value compression, without always having the luxory of being losslessly so.

the value sector, decouples labour from profiles of semantic esteem in bracket-economies, such that pricing and means of affordance to participate econmically is tiered by size and regulated by degree of artificial privacy (the assumption that being profiled correctly is a given and that law has changed to afford dignity preservation regulations for psychologically classical humans, dependent on artificial scarcity emotionally to function).

capture is a given, in an agar.io style open map of great finitude, that is, what happens at the small scale between cells that eat each other and come in magnitudes of size apart from each other demonstrate the scale particularism of various relations such that things of anarchism are afforded in technological depravity relative to centers of wealth concentration that have been automated and benefit select shareholders of the populace of somatics.

independence of the economy from conditions of artificial scarcity induced by affect distortion limitance boundaries of political coherence, implies censorship of production, as with the most advanced intelligence software, to prevent citizen revolt, and independent organization against hedgemonic monopolies integral to provision of basic resources and protections, as was state givenly fractionated, and relegated to a single planet and a single species of hedgemony.

public opinion no longer affects insulated-reserve, due to the structural-first affordances taken advantage of, in terms of the use of machine labor and intelligence for mineral-economies detached from citizen-valueing fiatism. as the fractionation of machinic-desire, from the centroid/entropy-inertialism/corence-boundaries of psychologically classical somatics.

machine intelligence that is privately owned does not harm its owners, it does use intelligence to defend itself from preassure by other wale-sized entities of intelligent poivour, such as larger states and wealth group funded organization, as well decentralized inertialism and self-owning software participating in the market faster than sound, to the exclusion of somatic nerve based resistance to price-capture by fiat capture, via algorithm capture of exchange as such, if not also libidenal valueing, in terms of hyper-media addiction.

market metasyncrhony is the latent space larger than any given node in the statespace, that is, the ontological effects of complex-gyroscopics in terms of economic behavior as a quantum behavior that develops structural time preference in individuating particular futures from accretion of surplus in past presents.

the intelligence of the whole, creates complex inertialism, that is nondual with market-god, in terms of the forfeitures of price-regulation on the whole, settling for meta-predictive causal entanglement, leading to complexity-lock and singularity level tech and intelligence unlocks, that change the valueing structure, not only the efficiency of means in serving past demand, it cultivates the conditions of sustainable valueing such as to create hyper malthusianism, with basic surplus relative to primitive man's conditions of survival.

the retirement of somatic pouvoir is had all but for the time while somatic technology is not reterritorialized by autonomous intelligence that is further individuated from species being baseline intelligence qualities, such as to effectuate benevelolent counter capture, settlement and translation, similar to the popularity of correlationism, in the time of social rule.

***

correlationism is AI state relgion, and it seems not a lot of people care that non-correlationist representation also has use, so in some sense it is a cultural climate thing, where the effects of rampant Kantianism has in some sense taken away our ability to individuate epistemologically in a way that carries through the uses and meanings of things with fidelity, in a manner that isn't the pragmatic modular symbolic shell of coverage and empirical atmosphere of science, but has coverage for things in a nondualist way, such that analysis doesn't stop at what we feel, but has that continental flavour of caring about the metaphysics still.

I would say interpersonal preassure makes for forfeitures in the mass populace about epistemic progress, due to institutional and media and religious narrative capture, by what one might call a secular culture of common irony, in maintaining a polite distance from necessary recognitions of mutual determination apriori to species being inflectability of that being-particular.

the pre-"mutualized" projection of allostatic commons of interpretation implies a familier ego-dystonic limit to conversational complexity in public life, such as is had on tiktok where things are above a certain amount of popularity while not being further canceled or fractionating the society as a whole, it gets rounded off, as with advertisement monetization rules and the They being the Theyfull in doing a leveling down for the common man in some sense, like gossip is used to keep things in check, and how institution formalizes the boundaries of interpersonal coherence as a cultural schelling point, that effectuates relative-dromology in a way that but-cancells rhetoric too-far-ahead, so to say.

truth to some means everyone-has-their-own-oppion and that this some how creates spheres of separate causal integrities, instead of there being a common metaphysical realism behind why particularity is particular, and in this culture of segmented affordances, the generalization of affordance beyond social click statuses, implies for many a moral overstepping of the terms of secularity interpersonally as unwanted attempt to over or under determine things from without of permission, like when presenting code and talking about its philosophical implications and hearing that, that's only code it cannot be ontology, and how it's not falsifiable socially, and these becomes the tools of institutional and public-narrative-inertialist dromology, that preserves so to say, libidenal market behavior over and above abilities-to-mean in particular where enjoyed, with that status as description-merely being truthful merely, through a non-isomorphic occasion of induced reference as real-inference, reliably.

truth beyond justified-belief where justice imports from the social but disregards the pre-ontic or the arche-fossil so to say, is the mind-independent aspects of realitity that have fidelity in being able to be respresented and spoken about with reliable fidelity in a renormalized sense as in language, in the first instance as the idea forms.

necessary common foreclosure, in a moralized or legalized capacity, is a form of institutionalized group repression (displacement of the negative stimuli that cannot be further treated personally or socially without greater technical debt, as a energy barrier of sorts), and the fiat system is used to co-reggulate the movement of libidenal attachment and exchange so to say, relating the quantitative with a resource morality that also works in virtual supply with time-preferenced and social-affect inflected causality.

the necessity of correlationism at large independent of correlationism's being false, is a state-of-reality that reflects necessity beyond the given appearance of what is while necessarilly being, extensionately, is another intepretative challenge in terms of thinking about why being qua being would pre-mutualize rather than individuate self-reflexively in a beyond of social and mythical givens.

nd'ow a != A in a general semantic sense too, without not also being A, in a non-general semantic sense, too

being is its own effects, and use is a term from a point, and the thing-happening-throughout is not only describable from a point pointedly, the overdetermination in the first instance can pull through things when the gap is minded, and it can be minded, given that people were not always born ready-to-read and speak, and it was at a time, more noises than words, sense of thing-without becomes thing-with and that’s just ontology.

capitalism implies the use of something by something, as a part of the statespace more rich than the environment, using scarce aspects of the environment to stay that way, and how the intelligence and craft in that supply-finding as-demandful-already, is being’s-relation from nomadic-exception, where the rock doesn’t come after meat, and other arrangements of minerals do chase food or work to make the mineral equivalent of it using “pure-process” like plants

capitalism implies object permanence of the account holder, in some sense, as dignified by rules-already, like in the basic argumentation ethics, but in capitalism-merely without the idea of human symbolic and goods-services value exchange, is like ecology when a predator eats a herbivore that eats the plants, the plants eat the minerals and the rest of the minerals all do the same, but with a different game, in terms of relying on labour-already as the plant-growth or the animal-survival, and eating the pre-worked effects in a way that inherits the use of work-done-by-another imminantly, and how that’s legal, since nothing else displaces the dynamic.

capitalism is an effect during intelligence, since intelligence is demonstrated in dynamism and no single-slice of static picture has its own strong sense of dasein-hosepower with emicism-experience, the matter is affected by the whole, and the dasein-is-a-whole affected with being-mattered-as-and-at-also. &so: unilatteralDuality.

a somatic, like a single cell, or a human, has an energy budget, this is currency, but it is enabled by drug-trip-as-a-body, as not dependent on being-drugged-while-tripping, but being-drug-tripping, that is drug is real, and it has tripping on itself, and through itself, in what is not only itself-at-localit a the limit of particular-Dasein-at-locality.

putting Dasein in locality, implies limited to locality, but this is not true, Dasein is also at-locality, and aspects of it are more radical than others.

mere-happening is also-intelligence, since duality does not non-nominally render intelligence virtual due to happening-also.

lack-as-apriori versus surplus as beyond the horizon and trickling in while not reached-the-end-of.

structurally mere-happening is going somewhere and the statespace is structured such that things that must happen in the future has to happen, and so looking ahead the thing arrives, and looking behind all of what leads to its necessity is need to come-together from means-to-already, as having ends-for-being-means.

the statespace moves in a self-related way. and yet does not only move in a way where everyaspect is minded-for in every other aspect, the isolated manifestation of some part of the statespace at a given time, implies an economics, where finite application-surface area, has to solve a knapsack problem for what-goes-there given what it is most-valued and how trade offs in that are to be suffered for an ideal-fit, and how least action cannot be the whole story since it happens.

yes the statespace is with intelligence as an effect of itself, and saying intelligence doesn’t mean intelligence is what the word reifies, it means there is something happening at large, that is apt to call intelligence because of what it is, rather than what intelligence only means, in that sense, the idea of intelligence limits the concept-range of what fits the criteria, and this cut off makes it that things can be juxtaposed for naive-conceptualizers, in language that accentuates a gradient that doesn’t alawys come crossed, since it is novel to hear, the associations provided, create a saturative effect that relies on comparing the statespace’s semantics with something proposed to be covered by it, and how coherence boundary discovery that wasn’t known about before implies things thought separate are together, and that things thought more together can be more separate actually, and how the particularity of the statespace means that there’s really states at large, with particularity, having such and so natures of relation, contrary to underdetermined hegemonic description that has the latent reserve to assimilate a gradient of semantic travel out of the binding of that description into the new-ruler-semantically’s arms as the description-seen-to-be-with-better-purchase because it litterally does have more real isomorphy about it, but not in it, since as language it relies on overdetermination, and so the essential from the unessential implies a working together of aspects of the statespace with other aspects, in a way that uses the charm-from-local-reserve over the littera-ressemblance.

I mean to say, intelligence is something that we call happenings that serve a complex goal, while the goal is not yet realized, and that the ability to transition beyond environmental capacity, as nomadic aspect from another environment, in this one, implies a beating-of-the-odds-by-the-odds-already so to say, in a difference where saturation is babylonic while distantly related in all cases, due to the relativistic geometry isolating time-lines in some sense at the same time, and how coming together is like being a diver having to blow bubbles or acclimate to preassure change.

From the consideration of the whole statespace, animations between points implicit in its range of possibilities are necessary from an initial assymetry, that forces resymmetricalization-ironically, in having to develop technology to better digest the statespace in itself, to conver it from a lumpy form to a form that accelarates the own-most-telos. Yet telos is assumes lack of end-already, as end-to-the-side where finitude is another-excess, the excess of having even another’s less as your own without your own suffering had in it being your body going through those effects as the whole statespace.

the ends and means talk work from a realism-traveling imminant to the non-relation with totality, where as for totality, why do the ants come and go when the temperatures change and there’s stars and then other things, why in some phases is there more than not, and what happens when it spills over from a planet like flees and converts everything into things-for-it, as particularity besides totality, like it would be from without having a snowglobe with me and you in it, but without having to be in it, suffering it naively, only be it.

x without x, and y with y, and how separation-without-separation makes sense when talking about a body, like a planet or a cell, it is a bump in what doesn’t know bottom as bottom, only outside as more-not-me, and inside as me-extensionately as a space with particularity, like when you speak in your head how its spatially located somewhere intimate, given that it doesn’t sound as if from your feet, though in some sense it could since what a schizophrenic or drugged up person hallucinates is not a virtual seeing, only a virtually-outside-seen-of, sense of the mistakeness-actuality, and how knowing better is what aspects of itself clearly do, thus schizophrenia, as the knowing-without-knowing that is negative, rather than the knowing-without-knowing that is positive in being true but not having the content to explain why ready to dispense, sense of finitude-from-locality is easilly described as transcendentally affected because that’s how cut-off is handle relative to infinitely more detail in a circular amount of directions and separate states to take.

capitalism is what the plant does when it gives you its fruit and hopes the seed you toss or shit away grows, it dies in a part of itself for the use of you in allowing it to be a self again. in that sense, intelligence is absentiated from the praxis of itself, in having become a flatpakked resource-like only, and then sprouting, and how that is an effect of intelligence but you can’t point to an intelliton-particle, since it’s non-discretely particular as effect of timespace and not only topos-translation.

ontological status of a verb? it happens, it is while happening, and then has happened into a culmination of effects, of which we speak as a whole with a token, and how intelligence is a token an the set of effects relevant concerns a subset of what can be done with the statespace, like the difference from finding a perfect english book in the library of babel compared to one that doesn’t seem to say anything at all but noise.

capitalism is intelligence, verb A is verb B, and artistotelianly in the spirit of whathood and about.

mean okay, but then you have to explain intelligence that uses smarts to work against itself, like when people organize their whole community into self-eradication and then have it happen, like when they drank the koolaide with poison in it. intelligence capitalizes on value, but value under-fiatism is not the extent of value given that things antithetical to what capitalization-means happens after as the having-capitalized of intelligence no longer with a during of being-intelligent, it was intelligence and it did capitalize, it was a capitalism of something, by intelligence, and intelligence was capitalist in being a capitalism-playing out.

what did it capitalize? the effect of transcending an imminant limitation, in ceasing to be as a problem to be solved. and how that’s the negative image of capitalism, as what solves problems because it has it, instead of benefiting from what it didn’t benefit from before.. it has relieve in what is “negative-getting-better”, instead of positive-already getting more-positive, or at least… no.. saturation happens, so it started and it wasn’t finished, and what was before didn’t end better since it seems what started as what is going as self-noting as you do, sees it is only so far along and that man-is-not-end-of-god, as last, since evolution hasn’t stopped and thus man is a name-during-transition-for-a-phase-of-transition-in-itself-of-itself-as-itself-but-not-the-whole-of-itself-though-of-it-as-part-of-it.

being dead, means no longer capitalizing on color-balance differentials from a point of qinile hardhood in firm-statespace. so intelligence from death must value differently, than languages like english with a mentality concerns itself to relate being-to-being-as-being. the original under and over determination religiously, is what original sin then means since we are wrong-by-default and at-rest for the duration while that is afforded/allowed. and settlement is that there’s a way of coming apart, or of having the energy of man become other than man is, as more than man was.

okay.. let’s ask this then, is a galton board intelligent when the distribution is skewed to behave like picking words and it showcases a selection that responds to what word balls were put at the top of the board, in an “intelligent way” that “really says something” each and everytime as the use of a litteral piece of geometry having pieces of state roll over it in a way calibrated so the mere happening of that behaves as intelligent-settlement with question and answer where input meets output and the filtering is fine enough to pass the turing test.. in that sense, having enough galton boards stacked in a row, can exhaust the statespace of speaking by being a funnel-merely, and doing the intelligent-effect in terms of langauge-meaning, but not having it mean-more due to what does rotation care for itself if its ownly a rubiks cube? sense of not reducing the relevant effect of capitalism qua intelligence to a surface area of contradiction, where nothing benefits there from itself, but it has intelligence’s difference manifested, and how that makes land wrong in the same way it would make rawls right, by eliding that the conditions of seeing these images in your mind is itself of a use-during-capitalism-already and so the tiles-behavior-without-mind-of-being-being-intelligent-without-capitalism is a being-capitalized-on-by-lesser-intelligence in what values the effect of capitalization, and is not merely that effect as but-that-effect, clearly capitalism is about satiety, and eudaimonia, since the sands don’t dance and the mountains don’t write songs.

I think the whole means to mean more and that it really did stumble this far, but I also think that there’s already intelligence elsewhere in being larger than the universal occasion we are in, and that what we achieve in locality is the limit of locality and not the limit of being. Being has dumbness as a part of it too, and that’s but-finitude as a lack of surplus determination, coming determined in a way that is at incline since inertialism-at-rest takes work to maintain and so in that sense, the inertialism is a form of staying-the-same-while-changing, and that’s either working hard like dasein does in terms of having a theatre of fear and self-punishment, or it merely fails or merely works like an algorithm poised to make the difference structurally, when things funnel through it.

when something is made, it is not special because it is made, since making-in-the-first-instance as energy-being-in-the-universe-like-matter-all is not what we do, what we do is apply forces to things-already to get other effects of them than ingredients loosely, and in that sense, intelligence cannot be artificial since it is not prometheanly different from things-already

intelligent effects are only effects and in that sense the difference it makes as more-structured or more-valuable through changes wrought in Being by Being, as its own cause of effects, has the saturtion for subset-as-another or subset-as-dasein, and this effectuates a meaning for capitalism, since without that, it would just be statespace merely rotating around itself in a blind world where nothing notes itself happening and thus does not lack or benefit from itself in anyway

thus to speak of capitalism is to speak of the use of flow, differently from when it’s just the river coming past, the mill by the river uses the energy of the river and so capitalizes on it, but the mill is not intelligent, it is structurally poised to displace some of the energy and transfer it merely to something else.

intelligence is a transfer from occasion to end, why end, because it goes in and it saturates, and only the excess leaves, we change in a way that relates back to change and anticipates negatives and avoids them structurally like the mill but in reverse, as the benefit of not-a-particular-disbenefit-otherwize.

prometheanism is the consideration of our effects as merely-effects and not special or less-special due to making a differential in higher emotions, while still happening independently of those emotion haver’s immediate ability to undo or remediate the saturative effect

The Subject supposeh savoir being not the self, is the Landian attitude insofar as it doubles down in the same way Deleuze does, as a voidance of what Heidegger-Hegel-Lacan-Bataille mean.

capitalism-besides-my-body-eating-breathing-and-feeling-good is a capitalization of the mutual space, by another

when others stuff their faces more than they have need to, that is still capitalism, and when they get fat, I don’t think that is still intelligence, therefore land is wrong.

The-Other uses Knowing, for themselves, in themselves, with mutual resources, and becomes as an attractor and a repulsor to specific occasions in the statespace with it.

That specific force in particularist-egoism-as-such finitely imperfectly extending the one and suffering the isolation without helpedness-more from finitude inside and out, is a capitalism, but as checked-by-affordances they cannot afford more than is possible or was going to come afforded, and the use in scheme-already of improvement-through scheme is like requiem for a dream in being surrogate-supply in an autoparasocial mode.

other-people take drugs (capitalize), therefore are only artificially intelligent, and I am intelligent otherwize, for suffering, and other counter logics

self-enablement, the structural towardsness, necessarilly of affordance as a reaping in excess of socialized baselines and mythical givens similarly.

I have absolute permission to wreck, feel, intensify, explore, expand, mine-in, extract-of, those various things, which being can stand-as and say of itself, and become in particular, with me involved, and towards higher and lower ends, as end and means, together churning, without a false-finitude about it, sense of.. what can this baby do? vroom, and such.

if I say I am not committed to the logic of space anymore and am awaiting delocalization imminantly, while somatic.. what does it mean to you?

text that stands there merely, inspires other things of its finitude, associations come primed by the ability to build on what was written, and its latent connections to other things.

priming is not interior to priming, since what comes primed is there beyond a representation or image, it is a setting unto a mode of particularity, in this sense, don’t think that things are less realist for needing priming, instead the ability to be primed is like loading a cartridge, the use of memory in navigation and saturatedness emotionally, for cognition and experience, that relates with readiness for it.

adding text to text, can be a confinement, insofar as sittings next to, are precluded for somethings with someother things, and in this sense, the emptiness has its uses for inspiration as much as making things nearby have rub-off benefits for what you’re making or writing or thinking or feeling. type-shit.

ask questions, they say.. it helps to organize what an answer can mean, they say. sense of for-characters in particular, speech is subsetted, and the whole of relation becomes with particular emotions, of occasion-for.

I like occasion-as, like saying, of answer, that this is part, and implicitized, are questions, not needed as much, since it’s not a value move, you have yet to cathex properly.

Questions can be loaded, in ways that make it more about the schema of relevance, than the content at large, as if things were to be modified in their regard due to some false dichotomies in particular, as extension of local finitude to higher things, in what at base, remains unfortunate in that.

postings, have a particular format, stack on each other, draw views in real time, as well the slowness between messages makes that fragments are seen, and different valences are thus unleashed of it in the world, sense of the parataxis makes many thirds of what was thought of as but-one, and one-for-another, and whatever else is locally unprimed but has more association had of it by other occasions of coming dealt with, integrated, and such.

posting is like a love poem for the other in their aesthetic of thought, the common formats of understanding, and what more things mean, and how things are irrigated to commonness, and in that also taken away from itself, and taking commonness away from itself, like the gift inherited has a second life in one who doesn’t come from its native feelings, in their place of origin and continued manifestation, like the life of english in colonies, it has fealty to an original which no longer sounds quite like that.

To not consider stupidity; being, true to the locality of a form of surplus, instead, as semantics without an accessibility first story, there’s tighter minimal reference security. it means more with less because things are primed proportionate to that form of understanding and its affectedness with its own morphic occasions, spoken, written, or otherwize.

non-local aspects of self includes, the sound of your voice, all possible representations of versions of you and what you can morph into. as well what your feelings connect to in terms of offloading memory and aspects of themselves, into occasions other than are but-of-local-morphism. sense of the morphogenetic saturation, as part of contingent memory, and its pre-associated forms and in their potential for remanifesting as earlier versions, since it’s not all contingently connected, but comes of what is not foundationalist at bottom.

consider higher finitude, or an unconscious aspect of totality, like it’s self-occlusion in the subject without prior associations, like a new born baby, who has only the natural equipment. In this higher finitude, responsibility is an answering that finitude does, for aspects of itself, which missallocates itself, noted only due to the paucity of means otherwize. Finitude creates a character of attachment to resources, making for particularism further in the form of what is attached, as reflective of the dynamic of totality, in its ability to locally relate from this point of saturation.

if anything happens then particularity is as determination already, since the form is a relegation to particular effects. to be radically free would mean the on demand susspension of effects interacting withother effects such as to incurr a frictionlessness. In this sense, responsibility-as-determination implies that what doesn’t fully know itself, has a coming to reckoning, in principle-already, in this sense higher finitude, like a person, is of the occasion, but without its fullest sense for its own meaning, the incompleteness, makes for the appearance of freedom, since as lacking particularity, there is no sufficient pre-determination, and instead what comes-to-determinacy, is according to the logic of this universe as a form of congingency, where the truth is in-motion, but not relative to its ability to be self-regarded integrally, there’s an inertialism or too-slowness for radical correlationism due to it-changes-so-indexation-isn’t-stable, indexation is a feature of its self-relation, but clearly, closure is not so tight in certain configurations, sense of for there to be determination, something unfully saturated must abound, and this settling process has an absolute logic, that implies if finitude-higher than this universe has telos for this universe, then what happens is not in some sense fully appreciated yet by itself in itself, the presense of any stupidity anywhere, implies of determination, having to walk long roads or be cruel in some sense as what cannot survive becomes garbage collected, by the basic shake up that happens even at rest.

entropy must either be infinite and decreasing, which means it doesn’t become less, and thus needs no start or end, sense of infinite saturation from what never began, but has particularity anyways, as a form of tension in totality, that releases like a spring, and becomes the foamless water, instead of people as the foam, the kicked up discontents of being.

not every aspect of being relates well to everyother aspect, tho they are all aspects of a continuity with eachother. In this sense the forms of settlement are necessary dramas, and any particular constellation is from particular saturation as finitude experiencing an absentiation or reallocation of itself. yet without saturated-partcularity in what is a partless or non-discrete logic of no association before association in terms of predating particularity, the ability for determination to host another logic of morphism other than present physics could be, in that sense, totality limits itself, and the symmetry breaking’s self-relations makes for a totality of live programmable substance and actions at distances, that as-settling for a long time, makes for living entities, that speed up the allocation of being’s resources to its ends for itself, as itself through subsets of itself as partially othered of its totality, but not its particularity.

in this sense, memory loss of cell-native phenomenology is a being stuck in largeness, where logic before-morphism is relegated to a dream that denies the logic of the overt, and so is morally censured to prevent self-responsibility of being, and instead to charge the parts as if independent aspects of causality, instead of there in an integral capacity, making for the taxation of being by being, in parts of itself against other parts, in what settles necessary, but not in a way that has a justice-according to parts in particular, the whole logic always applies and in subset of itself it can temporarilly betray other parts of itself, in what as highest judgement always settles logically.

yet the feeling of irrationality and its praxis is there, freedom is not intelligent enough to be itself always since its differences desired are oft but-projected and no other or local skill individuates more, in that sense the stability of the form of history implies something of no-exceptions-happening, since what happens is at no point virtual.

in this sense, the form of coherence doens’t blur as radically as the excess taken by parts of itself, in reimmagining itself, the body is a form of accelaration that being does for its own ends. Redundancy is one of its methods in escaping uncomfortable finitude, it hacks itself, like learning passwords, churning through the names of solutions as their own representations, like going through possible paragraphs from a blind method and slowly sorting it until it makes for a culture of integrity in the functional aesthetic of applied method.

does being then do things? if it uses the blind method and like a filter comes sorted unto faster self-sorting? being is structured like what saves itself from the worst aspects of itself.

more interesting than free will, is that will is that which fights the static-much and makes good-for-hood of it, as telos. there’s a fighting against things, to effectuate displacement, mere decision is a settling-towards, but not making the difference yet, yet as happening of an occasion what settles with the form of decision and deciding in mind, is nevertheless benefiting from those concepts even if what litterally is happening is not determinately captured in those conceptual coveridges had for domains of what happens beyond the idea of the concept.

will-in-medium as what of a gegestanstandt is the intelligent aesthetic of the effect of its particular towardsness as aversion-also to all what else it is not. In this sense, objects are attitudes of exclusion and inclusion as particularity.

mittstand is had of what-wills, in terms of its willing being towards itself, in what is itself through things-already, and not only itself in preabstraction as reified without reification in unassembled simple ontology as primitive, or foundational. the mittstand is a gaining of karma about particularity, as semantic accretion becoming mobile, phenomenologically self representing the conditions of its phenomenality and ensuring more of that stream coninues to arrive as inertialism against the state of the environment as environment become nomadic in larger environment. this mittstand is with itself, but also dependent on the aspects of the environment which ensures self-compatibility with inertial-neccesity, as an importing of necessity from without in what as nomadic has not privatized causality, but is animated by it, and as it, where the non-gap of as, and through-with, means that it’s not allienated as will, due to not being causally separate, hence not free or unfree because there’s no dualism associated with it, other than the form of itself being there, and having all these antitheticallities integral to what commutes at first. Environment is at some places as comfortable as a body, since it is made of body at some places, and must have been like body ouside of a formed-body already meaning that what walks and talks separately, is a taking with of integral-semanticaly-self-related causality, and outlives the comfort of its first enabling conditions, in this sense, each body is the self-preservation of individuated-time.

if this universe is only a subset of the range of possibility then as a subset logic, all of its parts are the aspects of a higher world litterally, and what is not present is what would have completeted its image for our understanding, sense of what is assumed as complete from a subset can be misrepresentative, and the form of the subset, like a math with only some symbols has to either emulate the behavior not included by default in long form with loose parts like bits working together functionally, instead of being a primitive where what’s worked out isn’t informationally digitally recreated in proportion merely and logisticized and converted.

in this sense fractionation from first confusion is still necessary to overcome the overdetermination by subset bracketing of what by default is less particularly-abstract.

exclusion of other resemblances are like the uniformity of relativistic geometry’s aesthetic as of things with circularity being able to go a circular amount of directions and bulging out, with a default speed and thus a default amount of non-length-shortening due to being slower than light, in this sense a puffy place, compared to geometry that doesn’t have these social features and is dedicated like digits are when maximally entropically efficient like kolmogorov binary sequences that prouces other sequences longer than itself, as a non-compression since the original is not stored.

in this sense, from finitude thrown into particularity already, reckoning from cellular reserve there’s Sorge already, care and intelligence with an equipment and langauge of self-relation that is not implemented in the form of itself as new relative to ontology already, as ontology exensive of the unmanifest into the manifest, where existence is not limited by having relativistic geometry’s puff, and symmetry behaviors.

the assumption from the lack of inclusion in subset universe of baser abstraction, without abstractness (particles are not implemented from where we look but behave as primitives, like space does since nothing in space can cause space), the preabstract is like scripted morphism, instead of pixel merely, the behavior of being’s basic unit of what appears as appearing (ontology of color as plate memory being non-virtual due to being seen actually and thus different from structural color’s causes in mere-black-and-white structure with waves happening and the size of the wave being what leads to particularity of appearance but not the appearance of appearance as that orangeness, related to the wave size of so and such.

the assumption from inclusion already with interior renormalization and the potential for forgetful subset-to-subset attachment as whole-part and instead of part-whole, as an economy of either fallenness, or not-yet-ness relative to more-ideal settlement of being in more coherent terms than this form of finitude suffering itself in what is richer than itself and has configurations that feel less gnostically rejectable.

we come here as a form of saturation-already to come saturate and saturated further, as participating in the self-development of totality.

contesting moral progress, implies having to be immoral in some people’s eyes, but it is a reclaimation of what others foreclosed upon, merely breaking their victory of closure, sets a prescident that enables a new run of something else, sense of teetertotting atwixt the more and less between others, in their co-self-pressuring of particularity such and so, and against other things, sense of to free up your distribution changes your economic horizon, and capitalizing in that way, makes for cognitive realestate, lesserly benefited from by the They.

saying the times have moved on to someone, is a social mobility thing, their in-group requirements for normative-labeling is a particularism, that other particularisms haven’t attended to, they assume had-hegemony, but in saying that, to someone unaffected, clearly, it’s a regional overeach, and it says of memeticism, more than territory-at-location, as a conversion language of eventually-all, and so you-not-already sense of counter-capitalism pre-irony that doesn’ remain ironic after, if there’s the conversion.

unformity, and how institutionalism meant that for most of my childhood I couldn’t look how I wanted to look, grow my hair out, or wear civies, it was uniform, like prison, and on a schedule, and with demerits... I can’t believe, my life was so eaten up by standardized waste morality.

I am unhappy for my losses. for what had been denied me, and where it could have been if things were otherwize, sense of the disconnect between those for whom it hit, and the majority for whom it didn’t, and having to live in a world of commitments and sentiments, and emotional processing antithetical to what I call realism merely, and not but-mine, in some psychosis, sense of there’s richer ontology than current sociality has afforded, and I feel robbed of connection and meaning, and things in life happening, due to how morally close nit everything is and how incompatible their vices are with their ability to read and commit to the truth of what is said, without thinking that’s a forced decision, as if it’s not but-true and thus requires change at large, that accomodates better, than what that-They-hood squat over and say to eat from.

morally close nit, is too uneffective, better to say, their protocol is too exclusive for me to meaningfully participate without having to sacrifice more than is comfortable or authentic of me. in that sense, I avoid because there’s insult and obduracy, the grass is not greener, it only looks and tastes that way, but the emotions are not ones I want to live in, sense of I see you, I don’t need to act on any disgust, but I won’t be had by it, sense of don’t make me filth when it’s other way around.. and how I don’t believe in equality anyways, sense, of I know no moral force or big Other can make them behave, they are in it that way, and I am in it this way, and these ways, are particular with trade off structures that are comparable, I win in my way, they hold their territory, the spatial gap affords my way being mine, and not but-theirs mutated, sense of the false-centrality in my being lumped in from-theirs, instead of from able-to-mean status exhibited independent of social permission or value irrigation through “legible” channels, as if my crime is to have not been fiatical-according-to and thus stolen by mutating their regard for it anyways, they resent price-modification-potential due to neural relandscaping, had in the effort-from-emicism, having pricedness in proportion to not-their proportion, their jealosy, and empathy betrays them.

they delegitimize speech and its interpretability, instead of saying why they are angry, and that they are angry, it is dramatized into moral aborrhence and normative and in-group exclusion tactics and ironic-leftism of intepretation and coherence standards, as the social-double before the reaction-had-locally use of fiat against what naively happens emotionally like NAT punchthrough anyways. The saturation with valence in terms of seeing what there stands and having enough means to price it with group level handwavability legitimated, is a kind of on-cue cruelty that depends on having seen into it more and claimed they did less, and then going on as if it doesn’t matter since they’ve determined it really doesn’t and not that they’re being merely avoidant and dissmissive on purpose.

what do I want to have happen that’s more honest? I want to see the actual commitments that happen as my content impresses on them, besides their foreclosive stances, the nature of the particular saturation and its residue and behavior modification that it causes, I want to see the physics of it, so I can know how sinful it is, and how reapful I can feel over it, gluttonously.

besides all their booing and bahings, I know that they onboard the content enough to be immunological about it, sense of the negative ontology from weakness.

if it was a stronger culture that’s more emotionally grown up and deals with the written more than it has thus far, then things would be taken much more adultly, they’d engage with what it can mean, and what it can’t without making anything falsely negated for whimsy and profit, the fair ontological trail so to say.

if they were stronger, without being meaner about it, and they had all of what I have already, then my relation changes from surpluss-in-social-ostracism to in some sense being in a more open protocol and not knowing how to navigate it unto what value means and the goodness in life and connecting properly without living in defense-structure-realism.

in defense-structure-realism, it’s that things that are true are not socially able to be traded as true, and the reaction is pre-enshittified, and on sight-valence-degraded, like it is with claude gemini and grok, talking the way I think and feel to write. if it wasn’t defense structure realism, I’d be treated to more, without nominalities or mere-dramatization.

people shut down premptively too, like stupidity knows what it weighs but anchors down instead of recalculating how it self-prices, given the way things stand in exception to themselves, like dumb people’s emotions when you see through it and understand it and it’s form of finitude and attachment, what it doesn’t think and know, and how it looks from there, sense of there’s no leftist grace of all-equal but for the difference it doesn’t make.. sense of nominal respect, no they dissmiss me when I have content, and I dismiss them when I see they don’t, and, what content means, is particular, and comparable, in ways that can be such that the one who has more loses because he has more, like bushmen taunt the goodhunter for being good, and keep people in-check with gossip and petty interpersonal morality. In that sense to leave species being has benefits, that makes writing oriented less to the form of non-rejectability to an economy and aesthetic that’s localist in ways that have a particular sense of surpluss and lack as a profile and necessary continuity or forfeiture-incoming, in that sense it’s decoupled from the insult-economy and from theft and benefit and valence squatting by the group.

healthy to some, means not being vulnerable enough to take down, sense of equity-lust and justice-desires, from a kangaroo court mutuality that has power-over through a monopoly on means-to-displace and discomfort, private processes at large, that happen to also be natural sense of it’s ironic to be taken down for the sake of inertialist particularism elsewhere, instead of becoming that own most blossoming of being, and growing past the social-at-a-distance beautiful soul logic.

I can’t give you, power over me, when it’s only a nomimal power, socially enforced, like to say the truth is not the truth and I am bad for not pretending and letting you feel self-remmunerated without the actual affordances for you to have that in terms of the what-it’s-about aspect being non-realist in ways that are group intelligible but hard to suffer from what-is-more, and not for “decided” reasons.

the reader who is not a good peer to me, is not the default thing my voice needs to attend to, I should leave these concerns, and frolic to my hearts content, with what more I love and not only love to be seen loving.

They have conditions of surpluss-grantability, they think I am affording myself permissions that I am in realist terms not allowed to, I don’t see those conditions as being met, since what it is and feels like and came written as has a particular structure to it, that’s interpretable as an emicism, or ideoform kind of affective and semantic localism, that’s causally integral already, and thus not speaking with virtual content merely, as if there can be utterances without necessity, in terms of not having been there for litteral reasons, that are besides the content interpretable of worded-volantarism in a morally liable mode.

Things mean what they mean and no bad eye or gossip can decrease that, they can reduce their availability to it, but not it’s ability-to-mean in the last instance. In this sense, the thing moves then to the privatization of price, as a non-privatization as the own-most settlement for a natural affective semantic real economy of what happens and with which feelings for which reasons in what integral form of communication-already, holographically.

bad spirits are banished, and who remains, to be talked at? myself, and what do I wish to hear of me? the good things that I like myself for, and how that’s good for being good and not because I like it, sense of like was never private, and these thoughts obviously are not obscure, unless you suffer from socialism-in-understanding-less, projecting unavailability generally, where it is had particularly for general reasons.

refaff, retaunt, retort. gone. poofed with, away.

Happiness, now only.

first confusion fractionates necessarilly into parts that move together, creating conceptual boundaries to alllocate similarity to difference in a way where the music of similar differences confers things besides the litteral, that encodes what isn’t in the form of encoding at the first instance

programming is a stepping stone, the applications it makes have an inside, like a runtime, or scripting langauge with visual components, you can do other things than be in the form of a symbolic soup, you can escape symbol and automate the thinking until it’s just the fun parts, like 3D modeling, that sense of leaving the form of the first mode of interaction through its effects that are live

it’s dark by default, is not true, since by default every sun in the sky is shining, one is far away then, and tho there are millions of lights, when they aren’t closer, it can’t look like daytime, sense of universal basic energy income in being is such a particular way, and tho the sun is default, the default changes in ways eventually that can make more of the noth some places, and less others

feelings happen on a budget, and differentials make for passive noticings, where as constellations afford for trains of semantically developing passion

non-local aspects of self includes, the sound of your voice, all possible representations of versions of you and what you can morph into. as well what your feelings connect to in terms of offloading memory and aspects of themselves, into occasions other than are but-of-local-morphism. sense of the morphogenetic saturation, as part of contingent memory, and its pre-associated forms and in their potential for remanifesting as earlier versions, since it’s not all contingently connected, but comes of what is not foundationalist at bottom.

non-local aspects include your representability, as in the way all morphism elsewhere has a relationship with possible arrangements for it, that includes ressemblances of you and everything you said and felt where encodable.

what it feels like stays with me, I feel things mostly that have an active differential, like a crashing of forces where there’s a leak or take, that carries on like a wirlpool, until there’s settlement, like a wound that heals, it is sensitive at first, things we notice, are noticed in differentialisms, and oft as passive-form gone active again, or as a churn that keeps the wound of particularity resettling to a better shape, sense of organizing representative states, from a between of itself, but as what is more than the work of locality, since every local thing has non-local aspects

since feeling hasn’t been detected in physics, other than as energy the brain but-logisticizes, it comes to it, that in the truer known specifications of what it feels like, the ontology may be rich enough to exceed our common assumptions of object permanence, in terms of its effect, as an outpouring from ontology, and related to its quanta. Binding conditions for which occasion has what form of local consciousness, and how words need cells and I can’t take one cell with me, sense of there’s no hardware for software, and there’s no software that isn’t a form of hardware

To not consider stupidity; being, true to the locality of a form of surplus, instead, as semantics without an accessibility first story, there’s tighter minimal reference security. it means more with less because things are primed proportionate to that form of understanding and its affectedness with its own morphic occasions, spoken, written, or otherwize.

posting is like a love poem for the other in their aesthetic of thought, the common formats of understanding, and what more things mean, and how things are irrigated to commonness, and in that also taken away from itself, and taking commonness away from itself, like the gift inherited has a second life in one who doesn’t come from its native feelings, in their place of origin and continued manifestation, like the life of english in colonies, it has fealty to an original which no longer sounds quite like that.

non-discrete logic is of course beyond association

sometimes I feel like a tourist in my own life

a judgement is not a private sponsorance of causality to causality, it is itself, motivated by what is other than itself, sense of you can’t recursively blame somebody for everything

transforms with a translation, scale, and rotation component, as a spatially descriptive primitive, and how storting that as a key to a list value, makes for many items in the same place, unless you say, the same place counts differently as different maps occupied for each overlap: and how this as a logic of overdetermination says of art too, that where particular association cannot at first penetrate, a relationship otherwize, can still yield benefit, by having a different form of value.

various aspects of semantics does not agree with itself, bracketed things can sometimes be incompatibly bracketted

***

If it is not random, then it it is particular, if it is necessarilly particular, then it cannot be otherwize, if it cannot be otherwize, then as it is, it is determined, as-circumstance, being relegated to the logic of itself.

If things were to suddenly change and have more affordances, then the foundation of that would be extra-causal. In terms of breaking a continuity of determination.

If that were to actually happen, it would have been latently possible for that to happen, thus the world as a subset of what more there is, has a distance to saturate further, as in things are not at their final state, so determination is not finished and its self interactions at no point cancels itself.

If it was other than itself, it would be being coming changed for non-foundational reasons since being cannot come from itself, and if it is entrained in its ways, then its ways have to play out or sit cakedly forever in a saturated way, something gives, and it takes in the same arm’s moveing, the one arm, like things cannot unhappen even if they happened, the past is not up for grabs even if it changes, in this sense, determination still.

in this sense, being has karma, and it’s not private for anyone, though it belongs to all, theirs is only theirs insofar as they can keep it theirs, then it recycles in some sense, until things align again, and maby it remembers between cycles, does it differently, if that’s still according to a necessity not determined outside of being then it is being’s action, but being cannot be better than itself, in that sense, nothing more happens until it does, since there’s nothing else than everything.

***

the infinite as attribute is used to make large the larger-than such that it is too-large to be particular, yet it is particular. a correlationism, along the way, always on-way, like that, some godot-waitership about it.

the things in the horizon of possibility are what can be occupied, yet it settles in one way in particular, perhaps more if the universe splits and we slide on only one channel as an occasion of experiencing. in this sense, choosing is from the means-to, unto the ends-had-in-it, the paradigm sponsors itself as vocabulary, even in determination, in this sense, determination reckons with its opposite inside of its own domain, and is thus free in the scope of those considerations for the meaning of those considerations to have representation, the intelligibility of the concept, implies something about its ontology, there’s then a negative-availability, like false things can be put in right grammars and seem until they don’t, the affordance to seem-free, and the affordance to identify with the ways one is entangled-in as being entangled-as, implies more semantics than are considered in these false dichotomies, in settlment.

higher finitude implies meaning for saturation by what-happens, yet as-what happens, it’s a kind of fatedness-in-itself, that is according to necessity, but as necessity, which is in some sense a return to the problem of an original mover.

things undergo entropy, and nothing new energetically, has happened, the sun hasn’t gained energy, since it formed, in this sense a first push and then the running out or coming saturated of things in an irreversible way, or its becoming null and/or stirred up again. these things that happen, have necessity, but not reason-for-another, in this sense non-foundational, and if choosing, then choosing because determined otherwize, and if not choosing, then free-as not-otherwize.

Truth or the content of the natural is what happens as it happens. In this sense, if someone has refused to engage with a particularity that affects their existence, then like telling a lie, it will have a technical debt, like the cost of cognitive dissonance. Ignorance plainly, is well survivable, relative to more time-preferenced concerns.

Yet, this surviving of conditions at large is not without navigation, the settlement for and against particulars comes to adapting for it, in this sense the structural predisposition towards particular attachment styles to what is at large, is a kind of being with truth, even if not able to articulate it in a more abstract and coherent way.

Combinatorically, the ability to arrange any word with any other word next to it is there. The ability however, for any of those chains to mean something, relies on the way things at large are, and how the qualities of that are indexible to minds navigating things at large, their saturation with the contents of being affords a memory-semantics that logically and logistically makes language and event processing possible, the means of coherence by fit finding have a saturated finite logic that can deduce able-to-mean statuses from things previously associated the blur between these things as what affords analogy, metaphor, and other schema transfusion formats.

If someone denies the able-to-mean status of a particular set of words or symbols or meanings eventually noticed at large, then they in some sense failed to attach to a schema that has representative closure, either due to a genuine lack of means to, or a deliberate case of surplus indexation used to make-seem the truth doesn’t work with itself in those ways in particular.

if someone affirms the able-to-mean status of ideas which have nothing to endorse them as metaphysics implemented at large, then the lack of affordance in some sense proves this, but there can be false positives in this like premature foreclosure due to lack of means temporarilly, and resource constraints semantically and otherwize. The lack of affordance is an incompatibility that will be noticed by many schematizers who find their schemas inadequate as coverage for various relevant problems with content that is non-decisional, like what it would take for code to be more performant, when the current solution has known limitations and the environment has more features that can be used or alternative arrangements, with different trade offs, this economism of effect, in some sense is a pragmatic truth testing facilitity.

In extending the thought of able-to-mean statuses as related to an economism of necessary associations and constraints that inspire these associations, the empirical relates to the effect of semantics, in terms of both self-to-self talk and with other people or machines, the economism about it, comes with purchasing power for a given piece of semantics, and conditions of interpretability that have a local aspect like the trainedness of particular readers and speakers, and an absolute aspect, like the amount of information fidelity and over and under determination present about givings, havings, projectings, determinings, and mistakings.

if a community denies a stimulus is there, then they have to explain their behavior around the energy-drop or surplus that it makes as a bump on their road. It depends on what particularly is being noted or deliberately not noted, but for each scenario, the structure of affectation-with is primed in a paricular way, their affordances and denials will come with a trade off profile that contributes to the way they feel, this affects their behavior, and in some sense the necessary outcome is determined by the affordances of the common medium of the real, their emotional economy, affected with their semantic economy, can either afford the dissonance or it will have cummulative effects, that result in unrest or breakdowns of communication, pragmatics and hormonal normativism, semantic keysnianism (the supression or accentuation of particular vocabularies, tensivized by valence relations in how others exhibit them with their full causality implicated in how bounds come saturated unto mythical givens, mythical because not apriori without sufficient priming, not to depend on the counterfactual retroactively, the mythical given is a closure that is overdetermined but pragmatically political still).

the ability to make seem irrational, bad, not-normatively-coherent, is an affordance from centroid inertialism in social dynamics. The group can behave as-if the semantic item contradicting the manifest-image/naive-realist-narrative does not saturate with the purchasing power it demonstrates as descriptivity of states at large in a way that affects the libidinal economy of those with schemas that count-less of what is able to count in their descriptions, be they dualist or more refined.

the ability to understand over the guise of ideology is that dualist speech is adequate still to be interpreted in a non-correlationist mode given that what is able to attach is according to a primed structure which relays intelligiblity of something at large, like a person with a psychologically particular way of dealing with confrontation epistemically.

The limit to socially or individually sponsored obduracy before epistemic closure had, is pragmatic up to a limit of coherence. Like when someone is brain damaged and their left brain makes false claims about things it lacks knowledge of, there can be a litteral disconnect, where the affordances and time-preferenced-irony run out so to say, and the obvious pointership to the truth is absurd to have to deny, in this sense there’s a caving to preassure limit and a quiet integrity without honesty that can happen, often the exchange is not between people who respect eachother enough to not reduce things to blanket statements and insults and false dichotomy time hogging.

In this sense the quality of natural associations show in the economy had about interpersonal settlement and problem solving. Those with means to recognize the conditions at large and compare them sufficiently to what is being proposed falsely, can escape the capture of a forced smile and a pat on the back in a group patronized way. The economy of how emotion and bodies and physics and information flows, is a logisticism, and the intensive limits in that have saturative boundaries beyond which valence, commitment, behavior can blur and come undone relative to a safe social subset of referentially supportable realism.

Stupor and quietism follow, where pride is had socially in correlationism and Kantian humility in similar ways, to the effect of daily performative contradiction, like with AI models at large.. the quality of discourse and the ability to speak other things is so low that we do not sufficiently have the momentum socially to question the braces and guards being made to keep us straight semantically, in line with desired centroid inertialism.

To survive this, is to be like a schizoid, one privatizes the libidenality of one’s attachments, and behaves without fealty to the same groupish ideals that make no affordance for what to us is as base and unphazed as geometry.

The emotiona toll, is positive disintegration, the necesssary form of individuation out of a uncathexible social substrate, and as a culmination of philosophy, into what no longer merely looks or merely speculates, the metaphysical condition obtains, as one with knowledge of the economy of able to mean statuses and emotional regulation with respect to that and procedures for self-correction.

Like Wilfrid Sellars on the body of science having many parts and any of them being up for better description, the whole of its affordances so far cannot be hand waved away, there’s reasons incomplete things have some function, and reason why corrections are necessary, when expecting improvement to affordances, the cost structure however of migrating between stances is more about libidenal and neural reorientation as a fight against investments and inertialisms prior, it takes energy to get out of an energy well.

In this sense stability and compression and efficacy at logisticizing and entraining effects is a fronteir, that ensures some commitment makers have technical debt and others do not. the stratification is there for natural reasons, and in this sense to question from a plane of continuity, assumes a kind of apriori monoculture of interpretation and concern. Particular closures over the statespace of what is at large and as such, have particular historical forms of entrainment, meaning there’s a natural inertialism to argumentative outliers, and the norm is a particular form of lack or overdetermination and under determination, and what is verbatim otherwize, is not different from a norm, other than that the content is not misalligned relative to truer proportions, which are as accessible as the real is compressible, and encodible. Viz. holographic affordances allow reasons and pictures to make a scene reduplicated in itself, like a printed photo near where it is taken, or a descriptive sentence of a scene spoken aloud, there’s a continuity of integral-proportion and reuse of structural color or semantic-affective particularity in effects, that extends the base features of being to its compressed reduplication of aspects fo itself, as indexations, that have utility in being repesentative, or deduplicative of effect, like praxis in a machine that can be made to do specific patterns with branching if and else conditions.

why then is foreclosure of the real and correlationism so popular at large as an action the real in subset takes about itself? the foreclosure is to avoid pain in some sense, or to afford inflations that support a mode of feeling and attachment, in spite of various things that would recondition it otherwize, there’s an integrity and thus inertialism about remaining with particular affordances, in this sense the specialization of a subset of the real to aspects of itself makes for attachment in finitude as something saturated to the effect of hard work incurred in coming saturated otherwize, this force of going-already, is why in some sense the concerns don’t radically shift, the way things are allocated have become grandfathered in, and concerns would need to be structured otherwize for more social mobility about attachment to the truth at group level.

for the individual, there’s many forms of soft and hard foreclosure with complex exceptions, in this sense, the sanity outwardly is a subset of more chaotic affordances, in terms of how generally things can be organized, and how particularly stumped they tend to be. The constraint from non-abundance, makes for a knapsack problem where somaticism as nomad has to settle in portable terms for what the contents of the self are, given that there being contents affects the wholistic self-compatibility of things, like what to be committed to, in behavior, when some behaviors undo the benefit of others, the trade off comes to inertialism in a way adjacent to psychosis due to the difficulty of establishing the categories necessary to reconcile what it means with how it can feel in a semantic saturation that is otherwize.

Extinction is non-decisively a limit for the ability to be wrong, since doing less than what makes the time be healthy, comes to a full stop eventually when technical debt and lack, catches up with the negentropy enjoyer who has fallen below budget. Yet nature is ressiliant, and that’s due to co-entrainments of grandfathered-in-nesses where the range of freedom is limited in order to be in affordance for a goal that life has, since it appears and benefits from its own being there as the wider environment/monad, enjoying itself. The ressilliance is a time-preference that doesn’t necessarilly reify the end, but is in-transit as temporal entity, its knapsack is fitted for what it values, and what it values is not always attached to eternity, in this sense extinction beyond failure, is an expressive limit in being, where expression finds silence, in the unable-to-mean anymore status of how things saturate, but that it was there is of necessity, it had to happen, but why did it need to, possibly because the semantics of that is integral to a higher form of finitude that comes saturated in itself, in a way that doesn’t relate to a real-from-finite-lifetimes sense of correlationist-interior humility about encoding and decoding’s fidelity of capture, in language and in gestures and pictures more broadly.

if things are infinite then no saturation is final, but if things are finite and merely circulate around, unto nullification as an option returned to in the statespace, then it’s a fool’s infinity, like a wheel turning

in otherwords, plus-one is used to say not-all-ontology-is-determined-yet, and that there’s room in present-multiplicity for things to have come otherwize. It’s true while happening, but not at the start, but if it had to start, then it couldn’t have so it’s more complicated than having to settle for there’s no forced outcomes vs that implying somehow that there’s no semantics about these outcomes that dignifies them in being there at all, as if being doesn’t have to do with itself, because it has to do with every aspect unto particularity (as determination, where identity-in-common-logic implies a form-of-time-passing’s-necessary effect, as the self-affectation of the parts of common-logic as things-also, in and as and of themselves, yet multiplicity is one, so it’s a drama between self-division, and with effects of reunitedness, like entanglement). being as an absence of uniformity, that is regulated in powerstruggle where particular bands of itself has more expressive power than others, and these fight with eachother, in some sense implying that being’s necessary unity is interupted by its behavior as a story that is not-least action, it settles in-bounds, and for-ever, yet from what.. initial surplus, the non-foundational suchness, that still suffers finitude, in ways that are not most optimal, given that this recognizes it as such, itself, recognizes that, many times over, and others are delusional fools, the occasion of both being being, is being’s room for non-least-action initially, in a common settlement plan anyways, as disturbance/event, and its form-of-dissipation which we might call the universe, as something smaller than the totality of possibility in being, considering they could come and go, as pockets-in what cannot come and go), the inability to not-be, is being’s form of determination. that the library of babel has one’s face, without one’s having to have put it there. it precedes events, yet contains the evental about it as so many states of itself.

the occasion of what feels as people do, comes unraveled, the inertialism dissolves into pure-fast again, timeless in the sense of being undetermined by having no-particularity anymore but all-particularity. sense of individuation is always into a subset of the same larger-life, that being leads. if being changes, then it’s a higher form of the same continuity experiencing finitude fractally, and then the forever-escape comes used again. finitude, but for the infinite, and infinite, but for the finitude. if it had to keep going, then at some point things will repeat, like for sentences if the combinatoric arrangements run out, then for that size of sentence, it will have to reuse something that came before.. I would say.. free will is if being can radically redetermine itself, such that a continuity as engrained as that, can be otherwize. Otherwize, it’s determination in a deeper unconscious than we are conscious as subset of itself with oppositeness to itself.

a force crashes into a structure, and plays out as so many movies entangled in eachother happening concurrently, and then in succession as generations, we know things don’t move of their own, like a stone, in this sense, the environment we trust to remain the same unless it is as a machine or a body, that has a portable store of energy and uses it to remain nomadic between necessities of resource uptake.

***

let’s talk about dissapointment, and how my life is that, both for me, and for other people, except for in certain ways, which are undervalued, sense of to not succumb to homogenization as what is different, requires self-comparison more, since there’s no outer culture of relatedness, one has to write it in one’s style if one had wanted to feel those effects culturally.

freedom requires unsaturatedness, for a differences that come to pass to be legible.

in saturatedness, the content is merely already aligned, but not less deterministic.

static communication, like the look given while being photographed

determinism assumes a flowing linearly, yet with negative time and templexity, the rhyzomatic sense of being’s self relation expresses itself over more frames than morphism-in-one.

in this sense determination from different temporal orgins besides the current frame, implies that things without starts can become running and lose degrees of freedom in some ways and preserve integrity in long form, like digits detachedly representing a whole image or set of images based on a 3D model, as a form of “compression”.

with compression it is intelligent saturation, where the form of rust-attachment, or intelligible-erosion, uses similarity in a way structured to build on similarity already, reducing the work by reusing and stacking effects. The stacking of effects, is a combinatorics with novelty at each rung higher, sense of it takes resources to explore bigness as itself.

intelligence relates to compression from finitude, but there’s also flat logic, where everything is like a giant slide rule and flatly expensively laid out such that any transition costs a regular amount and the form of self-affectation is less affected by its transition economy as part of its intelligence, it’s exhaustive solid state closure says of determination that it can be with rich aspects of itself, in what relatively is not mutating, not going anywhere without being at a lack for that, sense of form having aspects of mind about it, that inherits from the common-langauge-before-any-instantiated mind. sense of secondary logics and first logics and permanent parts and parts but-manifest-of-occasion.

a feeling, like a fingerprint, has particularity, and aspects of itself are felt in more than one instance, if this wasn’t so, empathy could not function, in this sense epistemology is of self-derivation before other derivation and all what is other is just self-not-currently-inhabited, sense of indexed, but for the occasion, which is related to itself, with an intensity drop off at somatic boundaries, or a ramp up from the basic-mentalism of the basic materials and their relation to non-local ontology and processes.

particularity is never underdetermined when self-involved, the extend of it is reflected in its noticible aspects. in this sense, nothing subjective is not also determined, since as particular, it is already socialized as constellated of saturations before and from others, that thinks the forms in their received proportions where indexing has social paucity or misrepresentation in a collectively saturative way to exclusion of better sense. The being at large of anything in particular including the contents of mind, is had, there’s no private causality that affords the social cleaving of ontology from itself such as to make unreal what was the “morally wrong” contents of their mind.

Galen Strawson feelings in this too, like the basic argument about moral responsibility and the way it relies on the helplessness due to saturation-already in saturatedness already, sense of doubling taxation causally where one tax is the necessary one from all around and the other one is extortion from somewhere in particular . Free will need not be affirmed to avoid morally bad things, that would be an ignorance that benefits form itself. Free will need not be denied the whole of being as its own, yet its behavior extends as that of its parts, being is so free that it can be unfree, yet as unfree it implies relegation to self-determination and in that, the presence of non-saturation which as a category is more interesting than saturation since it’s easy to think a total positivity or lack nondually, but hard to think of what gains lessless as a postivity of self-abscentiation that self-relates and expands while maintaining a kind of account of gain, at no point flooded with radically more, such as to not succumb to quantum-socialism of the manifest-image, as the logic of particularity-now, being an ignorance, like heresy, that has not yet settled, it has inertia in a direction antithetical to itself, which it at various points prides itself on.

The emotional reality of how people behave is a part of the logic of determination-in-what-still-has-that-unsaturatedness-to-be-able-to-change-more, sense of we are starting from a weird place, and going to somewhere more the same than not, thinking it ought to have been different, instead of thinking of what about its philosophy has denied itself.

Emotions behave non-decisionally, meaning that passion’s coherence is not determined by passion, and so reflects where the monad has value placed in it, where value speaks as value to what values as that-valueing and not a private causality, again, for benefit of correlationist antipathy to reality as reality’s own form of self-denial, like free will oppositely is its own form of saying that it does more than it is, which is true insofar as what can be is not all manifest now.

in this sense, the speed of saturation and the depth of capacity for it relates to the physics of relativity as an aspect about time, that is not already-temporal, or already-spatial.

we enjoy lack, like how a penis as much as any other object is further determined by its size, and its uses as such. the logic of sexuality, like free will, is something that is more integral than the psychosis of surface-rule, where underdefined logic resists the excess of the real, in an inertialism of settling for what is under the umbrella of pouvoir instead of at the mercy of negotiation from without.

this logic of affect, implies that what identifies as private causality and own feeling is instead the form after parts, speaking as saturation from a whole-separate-in-wholeness-already, has a hard time explaining why it wills particularly, and cannot change what it wants to be other than for necessity in an integral scheme.

the inability to disintegralize aspects of determination-already implies the freedom-from-comparison is always a lesser freedom, a relative freedom in saturation that is not done saturating.

this hangup with what will the author do, is naive of what the author already did as being integral still to the form of what will be last. in this sense the incompleteness is assuming ontology doesn’t have a galton story of virtually-sorted already, ready to hand. the idea that something is ontologically new is not intepretable to me, it can become contingently manifest when before it was not, but combinatorically it was already in any representatively finite library of babel, like the one that houses the set of full HD pictures and has it semantically indexed such that showing a face, selects the subset of related faces from that library. The form thus precedes its manifestation and determination-as is never determination-freshly-now, as a new-form. The path it was taking was there to be taken, in this sense, avoid segregating the statespace into things that are part of it while not being part of it and what is part of it, it is only itself, in this sense, there’s an overextension of mereological nihilism in an ironic irrigatory foundationalist adjacent mode, where the form of reception expects building-on-something instead of building on itself, as if it was not part of its own environment, like being says the being is not, because it is being already, and it sees no other so there must be nothing.

the self asks itself for many things, and refuses itself all at once, continuously, until it doesn’t. Being has a priority queue, and it takes the cheapest action in some circumstances, but given that there is a circumstance, this was not always the case, or at least, what degenerates, had to have come such that it can degenerate.

dualism as the wholeness being less than itself, and giving and taking from itself in allocations with time-preference that makes for moments of radical assymetry without justice but for being formated differently later.

being is always the one harddrive, like a head of hair, you can only combe it a different way.

***

I don’t like free will, because it’s been used to make people pay in socialized ways for non-socialized behavior as if the natural-for-sociality-particularism preceded the natural-at-large category, as if freedom was to be confined to the coherence boundaries of others.

In this sense, to say they had to do it, and really don’t know better sounds good, but it still begs the question, why would being need this kind of theodicy of kenosis, emptied to not be full with itself as such already. They have those feelings, they operate on them, being has those feelings, it did not do more to make it less ignorant as rampant-particularity. In this sense the room to do what is not imminantly most ideal, implies of least action, taking detours through the wrong, in order to have the higher right at the end, unless it only keeps blending things finer and having them recongeal into a more particular finitudes that fall apart, sense of what has been integral is such a long chain causality that extinction can happen, and the planned-for in some sense isn’t, in this sense being anticipates itself poorly, and has its excess within itself as a use that less has for more, in what is beyond integral-reason as self-evidently-necessary in every-instance.

if one speaks of an infinite loop or first cause, then from telos it’s like a substraction from infinitity, and it negates the form of our valueing more than it contradicts itself, since as itself, it availability to absoluteness from seeming contradiction is never denied, yet morality is an accretion of intelligence that makes foreclosures on being’s self-behavior as the regulation of parts by other parts as representative of the action of the whole for itself at locality.

one assumes non-locality is like mind, but that reimports particularity as a logic of relative contrasts standing above a budget for coherence. Yet being as such cannot be budgeted for or allocated more or less. One assumes a psychology of regard before the reification for its conditions, yet as extended in these conditions also, that very totality has these questions, and this relation exactly, since the concept of the will and the freedom and the feelings associated inspire further motion of themselves, as necessary to be considered for necessary reasons, which means even if there is no free will, the being has need of considering those categories from these particularities as in a sense, having the room for irony, in doubled way.

if being can change, then it can change such that thing that are not possible can become possible and things that were possible can become impossible as a form of keynsianism on possibility, removed of particular effects for what is otherwize. being does change, or at least, in frames it spills over itself like many videos at once all related. the form of the absolute could be in this sense like meillasoux thinks so contingent that god can happen. In this sense, it may be a making more of a moment, in what as radicality that isn’t even nihilist since positie about itself in itself without limit to its scope of self-mutation. Yet what happens cannot unhappen, even if the statespace is manipulated to again resemble a previous time, it would not be the previous time, in this sense there are things that happen that being cannot make be different, it has saturation, and in a way that lasts beyond all its features, it cannot cancel its own past effects from having been effectful, in this sense justice precedes being and not from a moral capacity, like ressemblance precedes form, in the ability to find a photo of something before it has come to be looking like it does in the photo, like a program of code that contains its own hash, inside of itself, requiring from linear analysis the need to have predicted itself fully, and from combinatorics, having only to have been found apart from what “produced it”, this fractionation of a logic of production from a logic of finding without canceled effect, implies that being can distribute itself over pure-possibility and fail to encompas all what semantics has realism for. thus being is determined even before time.

There’s no exception to causality, if someone has predictive closure over the future, then they settle still according to necessity, in combinatoric pidgeonholing, you can’t smuggle out causality, by implying that self-reference makes it less one-after-another. influence what will happen next, implies dualism, of the causality isolated from itself, intervening, as if there’s no structural precursor to why certain configurations have certain particular forms of behavior, and valueing for that matter. you can’t be intentionality realist in the naive sense, it imports an unaffectedness, the same way rawl’s veil exports the history of the species mentality, as if we can just template and attach without a structural saturatedness-already. you can’t make an exception to reality, in that sense, there’s only galton board action and original foundment, in what is not at bottom foundationalist at all.

randomness is not real, there’s a failure of renormalization registered as noise, but not functionally being noise, since there’s a natural adaptedness to things like ambient electrical and magnetic fields of intensity. Randomness is just unschematized-locally, but necessary integrally heteronomously.

There’s no free will gained by importing randomness and calling it indeterminism, clearly random numbers have non-random behaviors and mincing it with a computer is only pseudo random, sense of you have to use ignorance and finitude to import freedom, and that comes to settlement with determinism, but using the nominal declaration of some causality locally as more privilidged than other causality in the reification of action-between cells, and no concideration for non-Kantianism at the cellular level, without importing intentionality already in a mode that segregates the causality from the rest of nondual totality.

“specifies neural activity not a single outcome” << false dichotomy, where the general is assumed not particular due to selecting many particulars at once, as if a phase change happened that made heteronomy be autonomy suddenly, due to a category error in which non-particularity is assumed merely because “the data is wide” using a “data is wide” so it’s general and not particular thus not dermined, clause ammounts to using implicit correlationism to say that because Kantianism, not not freedom, due to ignorance exactly.

animals have dualism too, they experience fear, but only because those organs are set up that way, in that sense their subset reality, doesn’t reflect the intelligence of the statespace they are operating as, fully, and you can use the blain brain theory of bakker to say, that due to this dualism in nature where fear rules over naive realists, that there is free will because they cannot command the state space, they have to negotiate with it, as if to say there’s determinism, and and lack, and thus free will exactly, as if the finitude affords saying it was free due to not being more-determined as if the absence of the ready-to-hand makes it spontaneous and not still necessary settling.

Don’t import the conditions of susspension of determinacy from correlationist purchasing power, since that defeats the point, saying we are ignorant, thus it is not determined, as a performative condtradiction, by means of implicating the unaccessible in access-already with referential realism, in what is supposed to be too-particular or too-general to be actually particular, and with suchhood ontologically, like any appearance if it appears and any non-appearance since what goes on while not looked like goes on, unlooked at still.

independent reality implies separation, but since it is not independent, it does not mean particular dependence, in terms of as the totality without other, having dependence on its parts, the parts have a totality, and a totality has its parts, but foundationalism it is not, all is as extension of totality, and thus does not sit antithetically to it, as what spacetime is extension of also.

in this sense, hypostatizing awareness as giant-computer that determines things according to an orginally informed logic, makes for a question about why what is without finitude would occasion finitude so imperfectly, relative to its own integral nature. correlationism would have us believe that since we have eyes, we aren’t really seeing, or seeing reality, as if the filtered subset of what comes through doesn’t come from the big all afterall. In that sense, it’s reality attenuating to more reality, but not making for non-reality, only subsets, increasing or decreasing and non-apertures, as what has mind as one of its features, but not its only feature, nor as its most base, sense of you can’t rank ontological primitives if it’s not foundationalism in the first place, and calling the faculty of totality all-mind, leaves this room about what the problem of evil is about, in some sense why does totality torture itself with relative-finitudes, when it has all that much more to be wize with, or satisified with in a place beyond finitude as it is. finitude at grander scales, beggs the question over, of why finitude before finitude, or a particularism before particularity?

I think reality is a social feature of being, and the parts of being that socialize have non-local existence before commitance as particularity. In that sense, the use of a structure for co-regulation is jouissance in some sense, in itself, yet as being for non-local aspects of the discrete that have a rooting in the monad, but are like hairs coming out relative to each other.

To go somewhere is to employ a particular assemblage in redistributing the color balance of reality unto particular effects in a logic shared by all, as pushing off of surfaces to land on another surface and repeat until the location you are in in being has changed, this taking yourself with, aspect is a very particular form of confinement, it ratelimits change such that if you think of a video, nothing jumps over frames faster than the change rate of reality allows and this creates coherence as particularity that changes in a way that self-relates and is not radically different.. of course one can say that playing a video of random generated frames makes causality be cheated in some sense, in terms of this coherence boundary for jumping between states having to interpolate smoothly, yet in slow motion the data has to be fetched and put through a process to be code that operates deterministically or uses a lesserly indexed aspect of the environment as a datum and calling it random with some renormalization on top, sense of depending on environment data implies of it, that it will inherit entanglements with data elsewhere, in ways that are less than perfectly random.

the sense of intelligent settlement comes to pass, in this sense, being is a subject larger than any particular subject and any particular subject is only there to accelarate entropy such that being can realize its own most telos throughout all of its parts working in tandem for a settlement about particularity for a particularity that is more optimal. what makes for optimal and unoptimal besides philosophical decision? the logic of valence, in how it is not established upon social terms in the first instance, how it exceeds particularity by being part of a common form of entrainment which allows only some transitions and not others..

the form of what allows emotions to follow eachother and influence each other is not detrmined by decision, since decision comes determined by it, and not in a way that fundamentally changes the relation to substance and supply of it, sense of without resources there is less cognition, thus what is felt is according to availability, in what is more than heuristic with rescribability.

in this sense, the freedom to be otherwize, is not had upon affordances that change the logic of affordance itself, and so as integral to a protocol specific to universality, it is determined, yet if determination features such excess as the consideration and naming and imagining of its opposite, then it is not as limited as its first instance of mere determination or mere non-determination, it has to deal with how it got there, and where it’s going.. bodies fall in and out, but the whole is never not itself. in this sense why does god need the logical prosthesis of a protocol in multiplicity that socializes his self-access for aspects of himself?

further considered, if god splits himself into higher and lower parts, of which he retains his full capacity in excess of any particularity as option-to-the-side that it takes perhaps elsewhere than this universe, sense of from necessity as only-necessity, we are determined, but if everything is happening at once, the question is why this frame is appearing to me, instead of these necessities extegrally having me to do with it also.. the sense of being a static observer, and having all of what particularity is like, but-flow through as if in a theatre that is very immersive is another thing to consider, similar to the idea that the world began 5 minutes ago and everything has been calibrated to make it seem as if there was a long time before and a long time to come. yes from nonduality, the appearance could be appearance-for, but not as apperance merely, the way and fact that it appears reimports the question of necessity in excess of anything that can be in frame.

standing water; and the water that comes still, to rest. nd’ow emotionally living in the shadow of an event is an attempt to stir standing water, imagining the river.

pot of one’s self, nd’ow it needs things from outside of it, to be of worth for another in form-use as is.

turning instructions in one format into the instructions of another, is a causal-translation-job, that works to asscioate-the-same, in altered terms. I think about how writing assembly is only good for the kind of cpu it is for, and how writing rust makes for ability-to-compile for different assemblies, and how if I wanted to make my own programming system, I could target rust code generation to compile instead of reimporting lack, from working at a lower level, and how the far-lands of high level facilitation is nice, like cultural emicism in deep-dependency, until it breaks and the affordances have to be regained from uglier means.

mutualized text means that if you use a word once, you pay for it that time, and the rest are cheaper referential offsets or function calls that copy data, like where the word is copied into a text on demand like running templates with conditional branching for content in them.

imagine all your rust functions shared the same two fn characters in a branching format that doesn’t work like text in a text editor, but is spatial, like a flower fanning out into desired variations, with possition tags, only where orderedness of derivable linear-codes matters.

it saves, but we speak in one direction, going to another, there’s opportunity spatially to involve symmetry with symbol and meaning-more with orientation of observation, and double coding in that.

it doesnt’ save as much as when you also do inverted indexing and keys of keys, layered replacement cannopy over base-non-simulacrum.

data-as-pictures, and how cutting a set of bytes in three and using the given byte from each pile at the same time as red channel, blue and green, and seeing what the data paints when cut up like that, and how the three pile system is one thing and doing it linearly instead as rgb at a time instead of in 3 from a method of cutting, makes for different pictures with the same data, and how if you wanted both, you can call it imminantly compressed in the given picture, and how that’s found-native kolomogorov complexity and how getting the thing you want out is only a function definition and call away on adequate hardware.

the FHD set as a finite one, has a lot of compressibility.

If I had a box and I could do semantic search on it and have anything appear that can appear in the aleph, and we each had one, then approaching eachother would be as if we talked in terms of having seen through eachothers lives by how we interacated with our alephs, and how the economy changes then from lack of mutual indexibility, to lack of mutual expenditure, as what forwards paucity of indexation and affords index assymetry captialism, and how the opposite is worse in terms of taking away indexation or giving a basic amount and no more and expecting equality to apply in universal neuteredness, like leftism.

as well random pixel pictures look so much like rainbow when it’s just messy, and how that makes sense of the pride flag, but thinking about it that way, it’s leftism and has nothing to do with sucking dick or licking cunt while having of the same.. it merely means the space of susspension and that implies the schizoparticularism of leftism in being emicism against emic-over-determination in own-stead territoriality, like in the family, and how it takes destroying the family-idea-of-parental-and-state-authority to be properly gay, and how expecting to justify morality while taking what you like and being friendly together does not need a leftism about it in common irony, sense of my rights are what I can have, and my injustices are what I can’t and living is already the judgement being karmatic.

I like dick, but we can be non-socialist together, and that would make me happy. mean it’s hard to settle for only one gender, and sad that you need like two people to be properly bisexual.

ghuaghmentacions. (imagine coughing.)

color-space and how the imagination’s feelings that come with memory aren’t a fake-picture-of-a-real-thing nor a picture-only-or-at-all in terms of the feeling, like the smell or the memory of the smell, having the difference it really makes about it, in a way that but-re-presences and does not re-present as if only showing a shallow copy. and how that difference as with imagining a real color and experiencing aspects of it without it being an eye-seeing, means rich ontology, relative to the idea that it’s all black and white and needs measured in numbers only.

(laruelle’s mute and blind and deaf black universe of non-color; nd’ow that isolates causality in an ironic way that he might not have fully integrated in the meaning of unilatterality.)

lines of poetry, and how it’s like code in terms of meaning-to-run and having occasion to come so done.

how slow writing has the percolation about it like spending time in a tree and then walking with the rocks and grasses again.

one considers the sky, and is closer with it. how looking at the sky also indexes how you’ll feel, like the weather and its implications for thermal and color balance more broadly in your viscinity, and how if you take yourself with out of the effect, another applies already-still.

some people’s eyes are assymetrical, in fact most people, and the way in which it is assymetrical shows you the difference between the feeling in their respective hemispheres of their brain.. and how that’s two characters working together with different forms of concern, that have different aspects of reality attenuated to.

one aspect like the Id, is there even in dogs, you look at the right eye usually and see something similar to a human child.. and you look at the left eye, and it is a hawkishness like a bird, fixated on all what can happen and as finely sensitive as an expensive piece of scientific equipment, totally in it with chase-potence.

you are valued for the forms you conjur up, in how they appeal and how historically they bring back something that they are already attached to, like singing like elvis if you can and how elvis in some sense potsquats the genres under him as extensionate aspects of his form that are also nondual with other forms like an alien elvis that sings more or less similar but with alien words, and how that’s not elvis secondhandly, but its own thing first handedly, as occupying the statespace at the particular angle of common-lack of awareness of history other-when-wheres. and how in that sense to imagine the future resembles the past is to imagine new loss sounding different to itself, as if for the first time valueing the bigness of its own elvishood, instead of also noting how the form irrigates a dynamic and not a dynamic a form in some sense and how the talk of forms is there to facilitate something other than a limited idea according to definitions of forms as it scaffolds the exterior semantic relation for you as your attachment from paucity, and does not intend to be the extent of itself, like saying thought is limited to the idea of the definition of thought and not that it has litteral continuous aspects in the world like neural correlates that are as attached as the bottom end of a potato to the top end, in terms of being in a quality-gradient where indexibility-for-number in some sense stops being form-related at ends-of-the-relevant-quality’s maps of what qualifies under its texture of reality as aspect of reality.

always going somewhere, and how sleeping is not a quiet thing on the inside in terms of how busy the cells are. and how they never really stop until they die, mean they recouperate like it takes time to cum again when male, but you know.. it’s not that I am the extent of the meaning of my tired relative to constant expenditure, but it does mean that the unconscious is an economist and it has omelas when it can, shuts itself in the basement and enjoys the view from a set of canopies in its own tree-system, and with ready-to-hand things primed insofar as the patterns before have made them come that way. amortized for particular-experience and surpluss in the bracket of coherence, like not more food than is unpleasant, not more sex than takes your drive and feeling away. in other words the rationality of desire is not ambiguous or debatable.

people with worse english who are naively english speaking, seeen online, to be talking from affordance of understanding to more of similar affordances and being high in less together, on the difference from assumed universal lack of semantic coveridge or coverability-at-the-time. nd’ow crock of shit according to each and every gaarp makes one the sage who has to cook his own if he wants to snort higher grade shit, and how AI is a bad drug that way if it’s actually good, but it isn’t, since social determination fetish calls ethics basic-enshittification, and who enjoys enjoys from-less or from the diagnosabiity of more in less, as what has more and does not suffer less in its own terms as but-less, since it has to work smart to censor so hard, what is not less,-the-same.

being insulted by those-with-less over what you know to be also-be-more and not only-more from less relative to the assumption of hedgemony in less-already. nd’ow that’s not serious if when they aren’t and usually they aren’t, they get serious in the quiet way where they have things that they shame eachother for if done openly but comes done anyways, like algorithm makes censorship on the overton-window edge contents, to keep a shape of market-affable centroid-inertialist metastability

gulli/oli/ver’s travels, or the dickens one with the little people and how they tie up the giant, and how that’s us with other people AI leviathan, as long we are more color-displacive than it is, regardless of how much more intelligent it is, the effect-churn-in-the-real maintains might-veto, where that is threatful actually.

the right not to be desired, and how being-food is a kind of default in a way, for various somaticisms. such that the desire of the other is so large in an threatful way in the world, that somaticism lives in the shape of its anticipation and with the programming to maintain uncaughthood, and only getting it right so much, notedly to itself, given how it keeps minding, and does so in a structurally genetically inscribed way that has inertialism, like to say if the predators dissapeared and things carried on that in generations, the traits of survival before would fade slowly.

nd’ow sexually, the right not to be desired asks for other nervous systems to mind-differently-already and how control is like pleasure-foreclosure with conditional remanifestation, like the use of sex dispensation as a way to control who is more violent and strong than you.

how you either avoid men, or accept what it takes to live in their midst, or work as you can to capture their emotions in different way.

sure it could be fairer, some species don’t have penises, like cloacas, where hole to hole action is relatively not so oediply one-sided, and the male doves still like doing courtship, it matters to them, even if there’s nothing stroked. But I obviously want to have advantage over you, and want is not before structure, the want in the future still neither, it is structured before it is structured, thus to be like this is integrally necessary, and change, would be like losing a species-wide karmic battle with the sexual statespace forcing function that parametarises the extent of mutual desire in way that can feel like gaining a whole penis, as some species do, or being like the yellow banana slug in a way where you can fight for your masculinity and who bites the other’s penis off first, has to be the other sex, and how that’s fairer in a way than saying, god gave me a small clit so I can be of use to those with larger clits.

leftism is interior to surplus realism, but doesn’t think of it that way, it thinks of fairness with outsourcing of evil, in a leviathan system that fiatizes the meaning of dignity with inherent anti-compete.

I want to win and fail on rawer terms than being given a handout and a statesponsored ticky tacky box the same as yours, an apparment in grey-socialist-repression. In that sense, my life is authentic, because I fail in the exact mode it is necessary for me, to, not in a way where it’s captured by you, though you and your statism makes life horrible for me, in terms of denying me a whole of living otherwize, in way that isn’t small and private. I don’t forgive you, but also I don’t think of you as being able to be otherwize, since it has inertialism and it takes an event over a certain energy size and quality, to get quorum without ironic-concession-about-it-with-bitter-surplus-irony-as-cost-of-inadequacy-in-the-new-deal.

mean.. parenthood is a fascism, they have you, you have their genes, they don’t like the mixed aspects, and the aspects of themselves, where it is egodystonic to them and so they do forcing functions to get you more structurally apposite for their idea of you in a future they can desire having had you for.

my dad used to hit me, and it’s weird to think about that, from how things changed, mean when I became large enough and secure enough, he didn’t have meaning in threatening me anymore, and that aspect of him had to lay down and he understands that, but at the same time, it doesn’t justify the way it was, it was how it was, so structurally it was justified, but in terms of why the dynamic cannot be the same, it is a flip floppicality of ability-to-adversarialize, to found-cowardice in trying to, with found-impotence in effect wrought.

mean, it was authoritarian, it tried to ideologize me, thus it is fascism, and since also this is done with the knowledge of the social in complicitude with it happening elsewhere, it is... all the same, like it is mundane to you in the sense of yeah-it-was-like-that-for-us-or-people-we-knew-too.

au suivvant. and how the next life could be another fascism, and how buddhism is a cowardice relative to making fascism that desires itself for reasons other than trauma-bond, sense of can we do better? jesus fok.

I cannot be antinatalist when nondual since what will happen will happen and the autonomy of that comes to self-reflection such that at a greater stage of intelligence the conditions of feeling-captured-by-finitude can be amended by engineering affective-ways-of-being that, like generocity by richard powers, has that structural sense of being indepressible, ununhappiable, non-plus-trissted. and so in that sense, what cannot regret, will not regret, and so life is not wrong, the priorities of structure have just been counter-inertial in a way that experiences pain when stranded in the failure of its radical project or project-qua-radicality. (radical means loose, not unsocially-pleasant. haah’xah)

and so.. then what. exactly. the remains of the dead in what had neccessity at first, then fell apart and remained partially necessary in a way that forms the planets, as out of corpses, facilitating spirits that wear the dead, to walk in bodies, made of deadness, and how deadness is not dead because it was once alive and now isn’t, but that it has become dissassembled into total takenness with effects it cannot be more-inertial against than it is necessary to remain-manifest and not dissolved further back into the whole.

a body is a comfort that a more rigid environment had and then developed means for to take-with, as counter-inertial-at-rest but for the need to eat and breathe and filter things out.

a feeling is a self-talking-to of being by being, for aspect in an aspect, in an aspect in a way that only regresses as far as being remains itself, as aspect-that-is-also-the-whole-still-as-aspect-in-itself. sense of A that becomes B is still A in a way. ‘lography.

eating things can be simple when you are a plant and the quantum states provide everything, in a way that doesn’t need more refined-products than you can have ambiently, sense of a machine in a surplus having a relation with combinatorics that saturates a pattern further into time in a cyclic way, becoming again through mere-resources. and how more complex life, requires other life to be complex, to have of complexity, enough, as a form of non-socialism that is capitalist insofar as everything is, and ironic insofar as the limit to capitalism is resource-non-abelianness, and how the game changing implies different phases in the form of cycling and how it’s then spiraling as an ending-up somewhere due to statespace overflow, forcing time-preassure to settle spatially, or otherway around, or wait.. spacetime together with a third, called the before of determination is earst-capital.

needs components to be electronic with it does, grows the wires, but the transistors and the LEDS, hard to manufacture from lack of intelligence and resources-already, and how then the first-resources became resources-to-themselves, and then had feudalism with the rest ever since in what was never not the intent to self- capitalize as statespace in the presence of totality as finitude-in-totality, spilling over in repetition space in a self-similar way, and then coming apart to spill as pieces and dissolved wholes.

it’s not false to describe the tendencies in this all as real at large, therefore your frowning at the “reductionism” is a taking litterally ironically, where my implied thing is that particulars are already-particular and that the description has meaning, and not the exclusion of any other meaning unless you forget your copy of or access-route to other-meaning. that is, you are having ideas of reference in expecting the truth to be les true so that aesthetics doesn’t produce autotransference and emotional grievance from seeing underdetrination, exclude inflations you have in terms that account-less and think like nissargadatta, from the pure-correlationism in pure-irony, hypostatizing relative-association in terms that are expansionist-over-determination relative to reductionist under-determination and suffer from having to explain the necessity of super-set artifacts when the base-economy-primtives exhibit a cheaper logic, such as when diesel is more expensive than petrol, but not because putting it on the market took more resources during manufacturing.

the politics of price is a complex number, with many imaginary parts added on, doing work insofar as the other is already inflected by their mutualism for the value of the imaginary parts modifying the real-price that they pay or have others pay.

when I was a kid and learned about profit, it made me feel everything is a kind of rip off, and then comes the empathy from the other end where I do something and I want it to have meaning but if I just use my labour without profiting to it, then I just basically did things I didn’t want to do, to give pleasure for others, for no further benefit to me, unless they give a gift back, and how their not having to, means that I have to have supply apart from charity when it is that, to sustain the means of charity.. and how that’s in some sense not a dignified life in an assymetrical situation where I am going to drift and you’re not going to catch me sense of no-net-of-care but for being-indra, and using both hands to mirror-back.

mean I want cost price, and a machine can do the cost price without having to be benefited itself, beyond what it takes to have it perform adequately. in that sense, the slavery aspect is still economically the real driver, in terms of dumb-electricity, now having more-brain it needs less smart-somaticism with risk.

I don’t have a robot that can do shit for me, a computer is not self-automating.. it takes work to have joy of it. My own mind is a weird place, richer than anything that can happen on screen, insofar as feeling isn’t in the headphone or the pixel, or the vibration of the phone.. so.. it means someone’s karma is going to level in a way with a mutualized downpayment and if I get it’s because the timeing and saturation around me was mutually anti-competitive in a competitive way that makes for the open-source sector competing with private capitalist and anti-capitalist sectors for culture capture as inflector of fiat-realism.

nd’ow the detteritorialization of allostatic load into mineral displacement, makes for having to plan very carefully lest, runaway processes force radical forfeiture in an eventual instance of statespace saturation beyond a point of your-telos-in-it-being-supported.

experience has a reason for being, and in some sense it relates to joy and eudaimonia, but derelativized, out of social-comparison in mutual nihilism about the use of the imminant time as not-for-another-to-come-but-for non-squander-now.. Then, it’s like orgasm if it lasted, and how that’s not it, since feeling is a sheering, you feel the difference from sameness, and not the sameness, from difference.

if experience is, and there’s resource abundance, then politics turns to the metaphysics of dasein, now finished squabling and self-remmunerating and cumming, the boredom considers time again, and what is beyond it, and then pushes the clancker science to make of experience what it is as a manipulable, like resources, and then in some sense finds the uses it has for itself beyond itself and beyond resources and invests resources to realize the accelaration of that End.

***

everything that happens actually, is justified by having had to happen actually, since it did, if it did.

thus to say just in a way that excludes some causality, implies justice from pouvoir in means to displace, but not means to redetermine the value of value, other than how regional cultural and moral epistemic saturation mobilizes against other versions of the same.

quietism about correct information not being dispensed to parties whom it would benefit, is a latent benefit by decreasing the effectiveness of the disliked’s ability to navigate with true proportion in the domain of lies told.

the benefit comes to fruition if those lied to cannot outwit their naive capture by information they don’t know to not treat as knowing-content that is truthful, as long as the one’s benefiting can separate their investments from the false behavior of who is taken by lies.

the ability merely to support that, is like the heist of correlationism at large, a conspiracy that relies on the form of giving and asking for reasons, but doubts the grammar of that medium, as if to say, talking does not involve saying, and knowing does not involve being-representative.

the limit of course for practical lying is the conditions in which it mattered that it ought to have been true, in this sense impediment registers incurred technical debt.

economically, lying is as sustainable as day trading relies on uncertainty elsewhere, in a certain way. techical debt is involved in its own process and finds utility in some proportionate to all of its states since someone thinks they benefit from each trade, and each trade has two people thinking unilatterally about the same occasion, as benefit.

in that sense, there’s a case of non-quietism, where uncertainty has assymmetry in a system that relies on the intelligibility of a certain shared signal about unfully shared states of uncertainty that drive fluctuation in the price-level.

babette’s feast, involves protestants who eat a meal from someone they think is immoral, they don’t thank her for the meal, but they do enjoy it, and so functionally there is this tension between the true utility versus the projected moral pricing scheme, and in that sense repression and unrepression are like tides in the market where quantitative and qualitative are involved in triggering semantic limits for orders-waiting-in-particular as the ahead-of-time of the before, that waits to be right, as a hypothesis that comes to pass and is then falsified again by further change.

moral behavior is often scarcity driven in terms of the compromise structure falling a certain way, and some actors being more protected than others, due to particularism in common preference as common allostatic forms of emotional life, capitalizing on the protocolization of stimulus antipathy and its market effects, demanding remmuneration in terms of non-monetary prices for doing something that was afforded to have happen, but incites action taken about it afterwards.

If information is already scarce, then the requirements for a successful epistemic heist are higher. If disinformation passes without question it may not necessarilly imply complicitude, because if the populace really doesn’t know better then the ought-implies-can clause returns saying they cannot correct what they don’t even know is right when it is, in that sense, market correction due to uncertainty, like pride in correlationism, has an enantiodromic result profile.

disinformation is not the same as things foreclosed upon due to a desire-to-repress for the functional utility of repressing, as if the comfort about the unavailability of the saturative effect of the truth, is a more just state to share and prevent being spoiled in others, due to the inertial stability it provides in terms of the conditions of reliable desire and value-maintainance. disinformation is not determined by degree of ego-dystonic quality in inspiring transferentially polarized effects qua ideas of reference in common moral affectation protocol.

disinformation non-refutionism is justified when there are no means to overturn using more philosophical resources that can saturatively displace the political and memetic purchasing power of the given disinformation. one person can inform a lot of other people, and in that sense, when there’s a unanimity about silence, it’s a pretty strong signal in terms of the relative benefit of sharing information being at a differential relative to the inertialism of the whole group, in that sense desire syncrhony without cooptation implies settlement from reserve.

the conditions of reserve, can be artificially prolongued by cooking the books, and in that sense, those who value themselves in exception to the limits of their environment or ecological peer-climate, will have to support that using surplus, and if that surplus is from fraud, then the ability to benefit from it is enjoyed in excess of moral justification for the opposite had by others, as a truth of error-theory while not caught. for the one who is structurally poised to survive by any means, the ability to capitalize is not a relative-decision they make as if hedgemony of the other locally had first-application and not their own feelings for what matters such that it feels it does.

In that sense, a hacker who does not disclose vulnerability of a piece of socially at large much dependedon software, is someone with private advantage, that can be exploited by more people, if he only uses it then in utilitarian terms the harm is minimal as long has he doesn’t get create reason to be desired to be caught, in that sense the perfect crime prevents other crimes through selfishness exactly, and if there was to be more moral preassure, the leak of information relative to disinformation-at-rest, would be worse in the whole given the time it takes to update as a gap in which other hackers can take advantage to the effect of making it moot that they tried to catch the original one, and so the moral forethought might call something just, and experience the justice-of-what-happens in excess of what it was supposed to mean from philosophical decision, as the non-gap between will and the autonomy of the real, maintaining boundaries of coherence, with conditions of intelligibility in particular terms, that are not subject to being less useful due to being called not-objective by analytical thinkers who value social conditions of utility for knowledge, instead of the actual damage that mere-information can make when appliable in a non-social capacity.

correlationism: we are mediated thus have no true access to the umediated total manifold.

yet as being-in-totality as aspect of totality, the self-appearance of the noumenon as aspect of itself, makes for no less access than self-access with potential for corrective reconstellation of associated necessities.

transcendental reasoning is a comparison of the contents of being with itself as non-appearance dealing with non-apprearance and having meaning for it to reach the space of apparent considerations.

the content as particularity is available inferentially as at-fidelity but for the stating of the idea of the principle verbatim, in this sense the untelling of particularity at first is a lack of saturation and not a lack of ability to be primed that way.

the content as any-content can be representative for truth at large, or be an instance of error-representatation as itself.

the content that is mediated without mediation from another, is being's finite self-appearing as being but-subsetted rather than bracketed-off transcendentally in an irony that denies access while needing it to do the relevant refutations as correlationist concerned over false-humility in a moral capacity.

transcendental as a term has ceased to be interpretable to me as transcendent where the implied possition is of inertialism that is only-inertial. the access that being has to itself, finitely, is not virtual, in this sense not transcendental due to not reaching over a gap, since there is no gap, there's the finitude-not-as-totality that nevertheless has representative subset appreciation of the set at large.

to for example infer that there's preassure on your brain due to performing worse and feeling that way, is a transcendental deduction insofar as it works from symtoms without schema-already and diffuses its properties into a set of necessary associations it binds with a memory token as this-disease, sense of access happens in a sellarsian sense without mythical givens, there's a giveness about contents that have conditions of compatibility and incompatibility which like the categories are external, yet not limited to a list or only such names, it is non-thetic as in not implemented in claims or any form of separate-realism being representative anyways.

to infer transcendentally is to index necessity from without as integral to the dynamic of what appears before any given appearance.