parts with a whole in common
being is one-witness with many points in self-fragmentation in that sense, the contingent does not come as what-about-ism before ontology
maybe there's real-lack, and we can say that finitudes sometimes are not semantically adquate at playing the life game and then come apart, due to brownian motion as basic garbage collector qua selection-function darwinistically
being has emotions about it, since we do, that implies that the moral is also nondual with the affective, since it matters how it feels otherwize morality wouldn't
body without organs is like a tulpa, but I think of non-discrete aspects of being as massless-particulars that are turing complete in a non-morphic occassion like virtual photon is necessary for the use-in-the-real of fynman diagrams
cause is the self-noticing of events-already as local-reserve acretting semantic-compression for transient-data to be able to intervene causally by having concept-use adequism ruggedly against things that are structurally ego-dystonic to it
that is inertialism becomes a subject and takes itself with
suicide is a dignifying function insofar as it is a limit to self-reifiication of ontology
the way it seems makes-necessary even from without/seeming-unneed when surpluss indexation of another makes it feel unforuntate
finitude is being's own opportunity and that lack is only lack from having surpluss schematization ready-to-hand
as hegelian I am forced to say being gains lack
sein/being qua/as dasein/thereHoodAlso as subBracket non-(total/virtual)
a machine has a function, its inner workings are understood by who constructed it, like babbage with his plans for the difference engine and how computers later really came together after that.. that is, there's a unit which has an interface and produces a result in statespace wide enough to be called turing complete, when it is. effect coded semantics are analogous to what happens perhaps in a partially less-detailed way, but as a semantics-adequate to relate to the relevant causality, where facilitated to do so, in the translation of signals from understandable-representations into litteral machine-praxis instructions, where the conversion is assymetrical in terms of being differently understood, from how it is analogously-with-litteral-precision-effectuated in a machine. there's splitting of things that were considered only-jointly-valid, and in this sense the gaining of grammatical detail as the self-representing-real-in-Real, it implies myth of the given as nondual with philosophical decision's imminant ungivenhood, in the sense of overdetermination merely, yet.. language is an exception to lie-as-not-useful, since the lie facilitates the movement of the truth as the truth's self-movement and it's own self-misrevealing and capitalizing on self-lying to the other-in-Self-also.
signification is overdetermination as the use of overloading un-doubly allocated litterals, like making a set of functions and calling them together as a lambda calculus.. in this sense, non-abstraction in the sense of being-ontology-merely rather than mediated-through-mediator, the note-as-such feels that way, and with more notes, it starts speaking, language and feeling develop a deep relationship, in litteral terms, as the association-into, rather than a dissociation-from since the sound-litteral and morphic-litterals are still as themselves, preserved.
that is, abstraction is not what a computer is or does insofar as its actually implemented at fidelity, without having the gap-of-the-subject since it does not do dasein, yet still effectuates a knowing-difference as one of its ontological-affordances, as an irrigation of primary-affordance in terms of mere being already implementing space and electricity and the various dynamisms that makes for a meaningful-concressence in their own terms
stimuli given to cells, can form structures that anticipate the meaning of the signal, given that oganoids play pong when trained to, it implies semantic accretion is a feature in being, and not an abstraction, since positively-abstract-already without foundationalism story, since charge is a primitive, even if this is a subset of a baser set of affordances (universe as simulation would still be an irigation of an original real)
Redundant expression is never adequate to the concrete "mode of individuation" of a haecceity that retains an unexpressed multiplicity. << compressible media is adequate to capture representative aspects of being for use in individuation also, as latent ontology easy to make manifest from reserve, that was naturally obtained.
it's a peformative contradiction to say form doesn't appreciate itself, and that from finitude the lack of self-representational adequacy is a lack of determination that makes more-free
category is a particular that selects a set of particulars itself is a local-representative, that is for the representation of being in non-verbatim terms as the part where langauge/ideational-affect ceases to correlate to anything
implementation versus abstract-information as available in the field, and perhaps not only from other-signals-emitted-from-particulars-elsewhere, but ambient saturability in a morphogenetic sense, or a holographic entanglement-as-form-of-information-distribution feature. the implementationism assumes adequacy from resource morality, yet as forming-life the first capitalism was not exploitative.
given that hearing can be imperfect, the form can appear below-fidelity relative to itself as seen from more clarity, in this sense renormalization is real, but real in a way that is knowable about and fixable, like wearing glasses, thus not correlationist-redistributionism
(shadow banning [repressing particulars available to epistemic resolve], versus the truth of what the They would feel if permitted more by what induces such wants to participate in more, and how social media thus is anti-democratic, but then again so are the anti-establisment crowd, considering that the rhetoric of ownhood won by a majority, the sense of who was it for, is mistaken, and in that, ereigniss further beckons.)
wholes composed of nomadic active-elements (bodies-in-the-world-moving) and parts that rest in stationary aspects of the whole (houses, institutions in the daytime).. have a time-preference baked in, as a contingency plan, from reserve, such that when order breaks down, or is interupted, the parts organize as wholes-of-their-own in a larger whole, in this sense reddundancy affords decoupling as degrees of freedom that increases the meaning, availability, and fidelity of being
Expression rests within the implicit order as what is there without having to be dubbed there, that is god did not speak himself into being, and thus what is of ex-istence is a manifestation of the implicit order
(annecdote: Javascript as datastorage. Bunch of strings as dot js files and how compressions.js is a mutualizer that makes for thin-file-writs. Such is the will, but more gamified as a social network where you have to compress something to win, and how the size and time-exchange economy makes for a meta-mutualization project that evolves grammar through will-to-savings. And such is the hope of leaving by means of semantic-babylon. What a punctuation, so being.)
being non-canonical, is only an offense if it was already a semantic-fascism where the conditions of refusal are association-based socially, and not content based semantically merely
birthing a new culture, implies giving others emotions that saturates them unto needing eachother to amplify the meaning-of-their-found-cathexis
Other is Nothing vs Nothing is Other, and how there’s a non-sameness there in the ordering taking different meaning. What can we call associational meaning, since the compounds are not in the dictionary unless they are as-one already.. the asymmetry is interesting. Separating nothing by making all the same, implies things that go over the notion, like wings and wind cleave the air.
semantic-realism is not delimited by understanding. if a description is descriptive, it's not because it's a claim, it's holographic ressemblance that is re-inpsiring the occasion of reference from non-reference as over-determination that functions as that-logic for those-things as actual-still while particular, and no less real for being-be-ing-Particular.
the fight against particularity is oediple in a way you can't win, in fractionated terms, you need to become the One-in-One, as the One with/for yourself-also
the wandering in being is not without necessity, thus a litteral semantics for it beckons
assymetry makes things meaningful at all, since that implies going-somewhere, the rest of the temporal implies imminantization of arrival without imminant-transition-logic, such that ontology-at-arrival is not the wandering of a womb in search of the meaning of its sexuation.
Discreteness and finitude and how language has a longness about it that in flowing over, suffers less immediately from the constraints of spatial abilities to resemble. HD minecraft and other baubles. What is this all for? Sense of tortured with finitude in what need not suffer it that way.
cells have membranes (lamellas) and these are a cleaving-off of the environment, with a flow in take and out let that has a qualitative change, such that what values, as a perhaps a precursor to dasein, enjoys the statefulhood gained by privacy-structurally
in this sense, the first-correlationism as the non-arche-fossil or a unit of anti-time, has locality-for-itself through the individuation of a structure anterior to itself, it experiences the first-lack, as a gain from structural-privacy irrigating being in and out, in litteral discrete mollecular-energetic terms
I think that finitude saturates itself such that like the morphogenetic situation with crystal growth, there is a kind of retracing of a path that goes further than its initial state, as if the memory learns between subjects without being separate accounts of causal action, but rather has a kind of paracontinuity.
there is no demand to sate a social-already without the already-insidehood of the social, as endemic to mutualization-between-particularities-already as molar-daseins, ecologically being-mind.
camus in his own way attacked correlationism by calling it what it is, which is: philosophical suicide
the renouncing of being meaningful, as relegation to nominality, performatively