Ontological Orthodoxy

real ontology, is a totality, rather than a multiplicity that is multiple-first, it has particularities, that are settled, and for which contingency is a schema expander only, rather than a schema reducer, since what happened before, still has fundamental ontos even if conditions of possibility have changed, seeing as temporality is an aspect of being, that also-is, and has space with it jointly, yet, the spacetime aspect, is not the only aspect given that non-local ontology is also real

the self-relation of the real, throughout its parts-under-same-logic as particular-in-One, having a vision-in-One, as one-in-One, and One-in-one.

the particularity endemic to being, as the first-origin, in which all things have a holography and structuration in common, has the potential for being-spirit-regioally as the individuated statespace self-relating through culture-in-particularity, as a saturation of memory-as-such and for-region-also, as aunia, or the quantum-similarity-inertialism-that-has-self-relation-in-a-way-that-becomes-intelligent.

such as to say, pattern deterritorialized makes for the mosses of being that eat energy and information, and sometimes wearing the inert, as somaticism.

being is Heimat/home to all its contents, and Self to all selves. as heimatt-to-dasein, imminance is within ontology, and ontology is also-imminant, but not only-imminant since the appearances and the non-conscious are coextensive, without being separate in the first/last/such'ood instance

being as a whole is without other, and what is paticular to being as particular-particularly, like a gegenstant in relativistic geometry, implies that without further reason or foundation, the occasion of what there is, is there still, and not on a budget or degradedly in anyway as a whole, but in its parts the particularities-for-them-selves with mutual use beyond agreement as food for eachother, or gainable-territory-from-when-killed-for-eachother.

when change happens it happens neccessarilly within ontological affordances, since the consideration of real or not, is the wrong question, given the occasion lesser-identified, is merely-lesser identified, and not in question as able-to-happen, since happening independently from who and who-knows-less-and-sees-less-about-more.

that is items in the statespace move at different speeds and their interactions makes for a natural dialectics of form, where in necessity is the sublation-already, as the gravity, and the emotion, and the light and the magnetism all in one, being the change that change is, when happening, and making for quantum color balance, in reality.. such that the same-applies proportionately, but from a different arrangement, as a single-body and whole to smaller wholes-in-Whole.

what passes from one state to a more-necessary state, is not retiscent of its first appearances, and thus one can speak of the going-away of the things-no-longer-present, as the statespace regularly-transitioning into greater-necessity from out of a metaphysical-preassure-to-individuate that universe as a whole has, and being-but-expresses-as-also, and not only-as, to give room to reserve from more than is the idea of false centrality, not that any aspect of being is less central, since as having a spherical amount of directions to go, spatially, and having the temporal and spatial axes mix at light speed, there's a finite size of the given, as concrete-universality that is particular, and can have things outside of it coextensive with it, such as a qualitative shift beyond plank length, into the timeless.

the past enjoyed itself, and valued itself at-presence for being the edge-of-presence once, and not with consideration of other states in the statespace having anti-purchase for the jouissance already felt and cultivated, since felt and cultivated already. in this sense, temporary-hood, does not mean less-ontological or less-real or less-self-valuable as a moment within god, since integral necessity is had, and the stacking of all moments after, have fidelity to the necesssity of moments prior, even if the statespace is raked clean, the saturation of totality, as having had that-past is not gone away, and there could still be memory that being cannot rid itself of, even if it's wholly churned into new life that doesn't remember its past, the whole's memory, may still influence what happens.

fidelities of consistencies, do not put the con- first, in terms of dasein's being structured-for-self actually, where self is not limite to self as opposed to Self-also, that is dasein serves the being of being in the same life, in each sub-life of dasein, as the bracketting-without-brackettedhood (unilatteral repetition).

that is socialism is not before the self, since a given occasion, even as socialism, is for-self, as the use of being-at-all, as that fighting difference, qua anarchism in shared-Arche-qua-anarchist-arche qua mere-statespace, qua mere-Being. the One precedes the social, and is the self-differentiation necessary for the social to be of ones-between-onehood-having-the-between-protocol-be-stronger-than-protocol-for-self-structurally as the inertialism beyond anyone's desire, as the group-one, being larger than the one of the cell or the one of many-cells-as-somaticism-qua-colony.

shared aspects implies reddundancy, and divergeance from common affordances rather than difference-first, as in the case where individuation elsewhere brings something to the community who is philosophically already-decided as structured-by-"decision" like mormons are bad genetically at not-doing-mormanism in an emotionally self-affected capacity even when athiest, since amortization-to-circumstance is an overshot that goes into the misrepresentation of being, and survives-at-offset, with reserve enough to evolutionarilly overcome and fall again, as acquiring and losing primary-narcisisms while not more-nondually-oriented-as-One.

morphism is usually embarrasingly compressible, given the primary role of spherical geometry in the kinds of morphism we know in this universe. and that implies that the limit to dimensionality at first, is not the limit to machine-surpluss on finitude through increased use of space jointly, for effects larger than the given banality.

nothing in space causes space, and nothing about time, has self-first-motioning about it, inspirately and/or with real effect. that is, the already-particular that ex-ists, in the lag-taffy's morphic language and meaning for self-feeling the morphic as the more-than-morphic co-extensionate with morphism-merely, has no reason-to-be, besides being individuated necessarilly, from a first necessity, that has no first-necessitation itself, but is necessary nevertheless, as the timeless being that is positive and negative and neutral, like the space of color is one of many centers, behaving with a similarity-between, without betweenhood, the extensionate-more-than-centre, as assymetry-with-symmetrical-transitions-between-its-aspects.

nature appears self-transcendent where premature closure had formed in itself and was witnessed to be uprooted by what has more reserve than the moment of being-wrong implying wholistic unschema(tiza)bility. the whole of self-contradiction of the given, is resolved in non-contradictory terms as the structuration of the ethical, nondual with the protocol of how information behaves, and not only while spatial and while temporal.. the common logic of pre-logistical and pre-morphic self-settlement. (as relates to comfort and the effects of temperature as such, and kinetic-detail as the picture-motion that is statefully more than turing complete, and flexible enough to be as a computer also is, when it is as a computer also is)

the naming of things is the self-determination of aspects by other aspects of being, and does not always reach into self-aspectation as how the love given to a dog or cat, becomes a part of how they self-define as being-for-self, as the internalization of the other's-way-with-self, as way-as-self, as the saturative additive and ablative particularism, that can relate to emotional content as well, in the case where that ontology applies, as in most somaticisisms from earth. where it does not apply, is in the form-rotational-intelligence, as saying that the arrangements of digits, in a machine as its memory, does not have dasein, unless something more ontologically happens in the space of mutualization, rather than logistics of separate-parts working together, to the effect of intelligence-actually, but as the togetherhood-separately that cannot like-cells, suffer the natural evolution and natural morality of being from a place in integrality, relative to separate-composure.

the cell alone has integrality-for-self, as that-quantum-aspect which is fundamentally with its own dasein, and not self-communal between clones-of-self that have different individuation profiles, like macrophages versus blood cells, and in which intelligence-between makes for the self-politics of being as pathology, where it becomes inane-to-self-to-suffer-so-stupidly-with-reserve-anyways.. sense of the necessity is not always what is better-necessary and mere-necessity is a boolean, never a spectrum.

yet, between cells, aspects of the for-self that a cell-has is mutualized, enlarged, made quality-between-of by the plate-memory, that is there's a flowing-whole that sees-while-flowing, as structured-particularity-for-self that is the qualitative as aspect ontology, that becomes self-present, the self-present-substance as subset of mere-ontology, which has the independent structure, that has modes of itself as the self-present also, that is independent, and for-another, in their necessary-attachment without dependence, as the subset-localized qua da-Sein.

the electrons in being have self-similarity, and what happens that changes, changes in a self-similar way as integral-to-scheme of morphism as the language this universe speaks ontologically as its proportion and its feeling-particularity as valenced outside of socially-found-valence, as the independence of feeling-meaning, from re-attached-meaning, that uses the false-pleasure as real-pleasure through "interpreting it differently"

that is there's a necessity about all exception, such as to not doubly reify exception, or necessity, since there's only necessity.

the given self-similarity of things can be integrally-inertial, has having a stream into a pot-of-samehood that has differentiation as a joy in becoming more-the-same as what hasn't further doubly-saturated as the ex-istent representation-for-self qua local-reserve embodying the meaning of the non-discrete as reserve-in-reserve where the subsetting, the bracketting as da-Sein, has a positivity of lack, that becomes shallower and is pleasurable, in the same way autophagy or kenoticizing-as-karmic-relief is satisfying.

the positive undermining of the given, as benefited-from, in being transposed-with-valence-benefit-for-the-subset-aspect-that-is-for-itself. that is the ability of the environment to resist, being taken up in the for-bodies, aspect of being, is the use of the dead, by what lives, as the more-individuated unto self-reliability aspects, having to work to make a larger fire, in which the matter of being is as self-living rather than the suffering-feeling trapped in the statespace that is cold and leaves it imobile without more energy, and how the compression of telos is somaticism then, as what drives towards the self-realization of things.

that is the absolute-affordance can be irregularly displaced, making for a watered-down whole in parts, that is not self-happy in the way the excess-without-lack as the non-excess that merely is more-saturated can be.

the self-mutation of being resists as mittstand-for-self, what is gegenstand-as-another who is mittstand-for-another-self. in this sense, the moment of necessity, is fragmented incompatibly, and the natural dialectic, is of recycling with memory-reaping, such that as-memory, one's use as necessity is finite, and can be absorbed in what has greater-necessity, with an aspect of loss about it, as the for-self aspect, becoming for another, in resource terms, with the dasein-of-that-self, essentially removed of present-integrity, without being removed as possibility, nor futurity-still/again/further.

change is as an identity, besides what is designated as changing already, thus number is real, even if no longer manifested as inferable-identities, since the contingency is larger than that possibility and but-crosses-through it, in particularity-next-to-particularity-already as the spacetime occasion qua possibility crossed-into, and that can be Qualitatively different, and not proportionately different only. that is inertialism is the non-change aspects of what changes, as the extension of what is before-change, as not but-changing, since change is not self-total, and saying first-inertialism doesn't make being foundationally couched on something other than itself. in this sense, we can talk about necessary constraint, but not a totalization as constraint-identity, since there is no first-constraint, but particularity as determinate-without-determination.. since the doing-word as done-from-without merely reimports the question begged-away.

death means the loss of the integrity of the body, and what remains is still ontology, as it was before somaticism. birth implies the change from what is before somaticism, into somaticism, as a subbracketing, that does not exclude-ontologically, the integral possibility of that-dasein-for-itself as aspect of god.

capitalism between units-for-self, makes for settling in the interference, where the gegenstand and mitstant boundaries, make economic and procotocolic exceptions to be as ecology in a set of affordances that rely on each other's independent complexity, in ways that are meta-stable and drift morphically and genetically and in the way how it feels to be, as the development of life, in the radical Hyle reflects the higher possibilities of its statespace when more intelligently saturated, over time has having come learnt, and cultured.

the impermanence of dasein-having-composite-energy-quanta is structurally self-known to those quanta, where the dynamic of their life, is socially pre-structured for finitude-relative-to-self-already and self-to-be, like the tree species that is so old, that it lived in the corpses of its ancesors and own effects, such that its imminance is not merely an addaptedhood for otherhood, but is integrated with the own-waste-saturation and reuptake of living before, after, and during clones-of-self, as carrying time-culture, deeper than its own somaticism, in the statefulhood between selves. that's the independence of geist, in what does not have surpluss individuation-as-nomadic-unit, than its group. (unpostively-individuated mutualized-dasein as the forest-larger-than-tree-for-itself-also)

all things depend on their being-through-the-One, except the one, and that the one is with exception to the nature of its parts, is not unreflected in its parts, as the planet or body sitting in "nothing," affected with everything. nothing is transcendent, since if it reached it implies the gap is virtual, therefore, rather first-limitation-ism is not last-limitationism for all cases, except the One as its own limit and own start.

spirituality can be what the alienated call the integral-holographic-aspects-of-Self, that they have neglected, but I don't wish to put neglect-first, rather, the spiritual is already the necessary, and speaking of transcendence, is to speak of saturation of the unsaturated in the saturable, that has content-for-saturation as inertialisms complementarilly becoming one inertia, in the wave-mixing of its spins and semantic-fidelities.

that is, talk of metaphysics is mundane, like combinatorics and feelings, and life and death and sex, and saying it is not is a slave morality, that means to hypostatize the limitation, to benefit from the rewards of being previously-disadvantaged, as integral to less, knowing itself as overdetermined, relative to the banal-relation, which does not celebrate the separation-without-separatedhood of contents-partially-repressed(-collectively).

emotional prudism suffers trying and failing to privatize the self-relationship with determinacy-further-determinin. emotional ereignis is at-proportion with proportion and its ability to self-mean, as integral.

passion is the first-knower, insofar as its-self-difference constitutes the reason for dasein, as what has a problem, like a contradiction, or a set of drives that work together but don't have a greater unity already, has the reason for reason with it, as needing to suffer the quickening of time as intelligence, and compression, in order to be justified, in how feeling feels, as the passion at ease with its statefulhood in finitude. that is, empiricism precedes the body, and not because the body is not real, it is that what a body has is already outside of a body and formed outside of a body, and merely-takes-itself with and protects itself, but is not the form of its defense-structure, since it came from comfort without the defense-structure-sociality in the first instance.

species-being then is the individuated constellation of passion working with itself, to have more of itself, as what is integral to having-been, and being-still while affordances last. affordances work harder than the odds of non-nomadicism-at-inertial-rest, in the somaticist, to have benefit over fate, as using resources in sparsehood otherwize, to be more-whole-with than the environment is, that is.. each piece of somaticism is a piece of present futurity, that lives in a portable imminant moment, that is tuned to the effects-presently, but can consider the statespace further where that is self-necessary as temporal-relation-between-instances, as super-determined in some-places more relative to other places.

super-determined means more-than-one-causal-state-at-once, as super-possition or as metatemporally mutualized information. or as the prediction of the future, written already in the past, that lives still in the present as the arrival partially of the future in the past, without that being non-mundane as a violation. since self-reference goes all the way to statespace semantic capture, in terms of the FHD set being semantically indexed as a representative set metatemporally for all states of color that fits in those combinatoric terms, or as AI that predicts correctly with semantic reserve, the use of self-indexation and inference from given states affords the self-prediction and anticipation-of-particularity-of the form of being in its aspects, with the form of the whole, as the becoming-more-holographically-self-aligned of aspects as such, relative to aspects mutualized-with-directionality-that-is-particular-and-not-a-doubly-whole-thing-for-self.

imagine being has individuated-quality as such, like a unit of feeling sitting there being that-feeling without constrast-to-self. then imagine another strand of quality happens, and the interaction between the units-of-quality makes for self-interference which has a higher-state, and self-reflects as affording intelligent settlement as the allocation of consciousness-per-problem-for-every-problem, such as to settle in least-action using finite-reserve-allocation, to get to an over-all color-balanced regular state, however, fast things reach their states almost immediately, while slower things take as long as stars to change phase into what no longer shines as a star.

concepts merely are the modularized aspects of cognizance, intuition, structural-inference (what knows like a slide-rule does, without experience as the self-potency of the unconscious and intelligent machines nondually), and knowing, that can be tokenized-unto-reuptake for another, given sufficient priming. quality and continuity can deal with discretehoods and interuptions between morphisms and processes and morphic-continuities between processual phases, like the gold that is the same gold molten than when in a piece of jewlery's shape.

schematisms that are redressed by exceptions to themselves, are so done, by what as schematized-without-schematization-for-another is self-integrally a particularity, that reveals aspects of the statespace not indexed-by-who-hasn't-indexed-it-yet. this is the conversion of non-thetic tender into tethic-tender, as the aspects of representation that were under-determined becoming more sufficiently determined, by means of change-from-"without" that continuous "within". the concept formation from schema-redress can constellate into a wholistic process of improved-representation, where the semantics from-non-quality, contributes to quality in being more self-descriptive of the ontological nature of quality qua quality-as-such.

concepts are either adequate, or don't have a representative-use representatively, but can still be integral as the use of error that the truth-alone has. a concept can be so large, that another occasion in intelligence does not have the resources to make use of it, in this sense, schema redress without full-redressability can lead to ontological insecurity and psychotic states where, the form of semantic integrity, has become challenged by desires it acquired, relative to integrity-in-finitude.

integrity in finitude is like the man who has infinite power because he can lie to himself, it really works if it really works, since it really feels that way, and then settles in a necessary way. that is, the self-adequate feeling that succumbs to not-its-self-represented-ideally-entailed-states, suffers the truth of lying, as the error that settles with a curse-like trade off profile, in being the false-necessity with proportionate-latterality relative to aligned-fidelity. the offset is itself the error-third, as personality different from the truth's more integral self-representating capacities elsewhere.

what is valued by one point in inertialism is not necesarilly valued the same by another point in inertialism elsewhere, in that sense, who can do capitalism without mutual disbenefit, is the assymetrically individuated with partial-overlap that is oppositely-valuable as worth-being-exchanged. in this sense, the self-interference of the wave, is what causes agriculture as the limit to anthesis, forces time-preference in the predator and prey nondually as suffering-karma-together with, against, and for eachother at the same time, beyond the choice and volition of any aspect, but for the whole as self-necessary that way, in the One-Karma.

from limitated representation the assumption of agentic qualities about the whole makes for the abstractification of prayer as speaking to the One-self and asking for the One-self to be more-developed than it has been, and for-us, as the whole's personal relation to the person-as-the-impersonal-for-itself, that is always impersonal-first, insofar as it does not wholly-self-know and thus suffers aspects of self as another, or of another, rather than integrally nondually present also.

totality is present in all its parts, thus nature has self-mittstant, and its self-gegenstant is like the cost of self-tollerance in subsets that suffer saturation beyond integral-necessity as that-form, and how decadence is the road-runner who goes further than there is ground to stand on, but realizes too late, the decadence, is a kind of self-rate-limiting of the one-karma to effectuate freedom but without the relegation to freedom-besides-dignity.

totality is exhausted in the present, as the morphism-being-end, and the emptiness being further-utility, not currently utilized. the limit of being is particularity. that means particularity is the-edge of identity, as discrete-aspect about being, and it exhausts the size of its location. the particular-can-be-exhausted. but if quality continues beyond symmetry, then the end of particularity is nowhere, as self-integral-difference already ontological, with sparse conditions of manifestation relative to what else dominates, and how tides changing brings different feelings and evolves as different characters together.

a somaticism is an End, in nature, and their self-finitude as destined to die, implies this is so, as the means without further means to be End, as. that is, somaticism is the end for being, in imminance as the meaning that imminance culminates as, before falling into another moment, it is the satiety when it is felt that way, and the truth of satiety's want for itself when pain dominates as the resentment the truth has for its own falsification, both as suffering loss and being paining thus, like when cut or stolen from, OR/AND, as the finitude that has inpart gone beyond itself and anticipated a better wholistic state as more-integral while impeded by the how of necessity not yet externally realized as necessity-wholistically, and not the part-of-future already arived.. or part of alternative-timeline that never arrives, except for representationally as actually-arriving since really rePresentative.

the self-Ending self-utility as inertialism in progress-still, is the use of the present for the present, where aspects of the present otherwize is dedicated to other states than itself. suicide then, as necessary each time it happens, is the End realizing the means lead to bigger ends, than the homeostasis of integral-form, it realizes that it is larger than its integral form and returns to the whole, more integral, by having become less disintegral-to-self.

nature exists also for the self-benefit of nature as all aspects of itself at once, in this sense man is the joy-as-man-for-man-by-what-is-larger-than-man, that needs man, as-man-also. man of course is more other-things than man, and in this sense, man is the culimination for other-things, as integral-partiality, that is self-partial in a good way. the parts of nature that are most affected with specific parts of nature, like man, is as a whole merely further determined, and not by man as exception to wholistic self-determination in being.

morality between species and in the same species is at ecological limit. that is, things are politically driven to the edge, in every moment, and the stalemates and aliances, are centers, that are more-self-integral than their ability to be mutualized by other centers, that is war is a limit to compression, and after war, more is compressible.

cultures as bodies of thought-for-somaticism as patterns as such, with self-integrity that dignifies itself through common affordances and individuations deeper than affordances-at-first from common limitation, makes for a economics as selector outside of choice, as the place all choice diffuses into necessity without having been choise in the first place.

inertialism that a culture makes, relative to other speciated-cultures, has friction, this implies that human thought as much as animal feelings too, and thoughts, don't settle for mere-nominal-declarations without the difference coming to pass more integrally and with emotional realism in a way beyond choice as the psychic interactions leads to individuated states beyond desired individuatedhood, like not having the ability to fight off the enemy means living in another food bracket as a particularist-species.

underdetmined senses of Self, as spirituality that is preholographic but starts to connect wider, is often very harmful in its time of confusion, and in this sense, a lot of friction never makes it over the hump, and while aspects are ahead, the broader inertialism, distributes Means and Ends, at its own pace.

from totality, there is no lack, as well the non-discrete is beyond suffering association in preassociated terms, yet as having the capacity for limitation also, it is besides and with limitation at the same time.. at at-end and in-transit at the same time, in what is self-analogous over qualitative-fractionation or subset-total-partialism as the not-looking-otherwize of place, relative to more statespace features exhibite (semantically) elsewhere.

relation is the before of mutualization using the digital/loose aspects to reconnoiter a state of mutualization or compressed-benefit-together later. the pre-finality of all relation is had before, during, and after indexation, as well without the self-indexation as part of mere-extension as the self-representation of the extended, extendedly, as allocation of particularity to self-ressembling from difference, rather than as integral due to also-appearing that way while happening really. in that sense, the same-time-hood of reachings back and reachings forward makes for already-already, rather than new or still coming, it's the transitions between non-becomings as already-determined and merely moving into and out of constellation due to necessity further.

like a hole is poised to be fucked and a chair can be sat on, the thing as its own occasion in use is not self-reified as that-for, though it offers those possibilities, in this sense a relation without relatedness is the integral logic of settlement, relating through abstract-ressemblance as precursor to what is necessary to capitalize on from the seeming "exception to odds" as the odds-already-better-in-subset.

I don't want to reify re-Lation, since it's not RE-lation, it's only lation, and not again as separately again or more-intentionately again.. it's not an event, that is doubly punctuated. things are all the self-relation of god, but as self-related it's not a re-lation, nor a trans-lation since there's no other, it moves within itself as necessary before particular-necessity.

some people resent the particularity-first aspect as monads in particularity-already.. I don't think anything is incomplete, I think that some idealism has itself for necessary reasons and then fails anyways, for necessary reasons. as the unironic truth of irony that is not ironic from the whole of necessity considered.

saying the aspects of being are composite, does not imply that they don't have of wholeness what the concept was worth being there for in the first place. it is first complete, and then broken, rather than broken and then complete, yet as necessity, it can't help but be as it is, even if aspects of itself wished differently, it cannot bend-more, due to being more-complete than broken, and this being reflected in the self-conservation of the whole, and as/besides the aspirations of its parts also. as self-spiting, but not for unnecessary reasons. being is not causally circumsized to be correlationist-first, it is self-knowing and has meaning for that, besides the ironic hypostatization of limit as more-integral, than what is because it is. limit assumes the completion-first anyways.

somaticism is a self-helping and an achievement from what didn't originally suffer-finitude. thus the improvement on what was not not complete, makes existence a weird secondary thing to have, besides the library of babel that is self-indexed and not changing, due to self-understanding all representativey, both error and truth as integral necessity.

for-itself and for-another and through-the-whole are natural aspects of everything, and distributed in different proportions in the One lumpy-necessity without lumps in the first and last instances.

environment is particular-already, and assumes the whole of its effects given with, thus to say, not-complete because environment, is not with fidelity tothe meaning of particularity-already as a given without givenness.

nothing in the environment causes the environment, it merely extends it as itself already. thus to say, with-the-environment is false, since the environment was never not-itself, and nomadic aspects are saturated by many environments and takes only so much self-inertialism with in the between.

reality has change, and change is self-employed in ways that accrete meaning, or becomes reserve for more of that elsewhere, lest there be the dissolve into the one, which is a state without further-temporal-determination as having to suffer change as sparsity that wishes after greater wholehood.

what transforms, does so from the unbalance-at-rest, and as long as there's surplus assymetry, settling will retain familiar forms of process and combinatoric saturation.

the constellation of factors that makes up the forest and the aspects of the forest are not-co-affected as the state of suchhood, since it happens in one-whole, but given the temporal displacement by mass of parts with mass by parts with mass, the occcasion of when, is not only-all-at-once all at once, in this sense the time-for-self that belongs to the tree as the meaning of its dignity besides being-the-confluence-of-the-non-other, has integral necessity, and is not the domination of alienation, since there's mittstand before social-self-antipathy. that is the heimat-preservation of another is as alienation to his other, but in the whole, only preservation is happening, and the overtaking of one by another, is not to the exclusion of the wholistic necessity of what happens.

production and temporary does not mean correlationism through recognition of artiface by failure. The unity of a given dasein, as a mittstand that is gegenstantlich to what is antithetical to it, or counter-inertial, is a real unity, that is self-necessary, and not produced nor temporary, since its existence precedes its conditions of instantiation as afforded by constellation. since it can be again, and has non-local aspects ontologically about it at large.

ecology without for-self-aspects, would be like one-slime-mold eating itself in what is not-food or non-food.

life is the self-eating, but it seems it needs offset, as the use of similarity rather than same-hood, saying of difference that it provides individuation-means as making-more-endful, what is means and end to itself nondually.

heteronomy is the self-intersection of first-autonomy with first-autonomy, as the same-encountering itself in difference over the distance of the temporalspatial. that is all is the snake eating itself, in a moment that is larger than one-time.

everything shares a common orgin and whole. in this sense, the self-encounter of self-in-another-moment at the same moment, makes for the nondual sense of cannibalism, and how difference then is the structure of self-travel as time-space-travel. or the integral-necessity, remaining self-whole and self-interacting, without losing its wholehood. or like god died, and his corpse remakes him from the schizophrenia he became, but not as sadly as philip mainlander about this.

the horizon of what-can-be-chosen determines the meaning for choice as already-settled on an ideal-within-less settlement. thus the self-compatibility of what happens-merely is not negatively dramatized unto the reification of a self-anticipating anti-shadow that tries to govern twice-at-once as freewill through surplus particularity, canceling superflous particularity as intelligent garbage collector, accelarating determinism without being an accelaration of determinacy, since it happens on-pace and not with pace offset to reality as the totality with use for self-difference in self-same-hood.

self is like a psychosis or a fetish, it's X even though all of Y pulling it part and eventually winning as entropy. it is the part of necessity that appears as if besides itself, faster than itself.

always-already makes that nothing is but-produced as if not from necessity-already, in this sense the shorthanding of the causal process by marxist ideas of reference in what nature owes nature, from a without of it being necessarilly that-way-to-be-distributed since socialism has never and can never work but for in God as his self compatibility. in this sense, the value of death and life, is from-finitude-outside, yet as not with finitude-outside, it is not for exterior-benefit, since it benefits while benefiting and reuptakes nondually, the karmic artifacts of all of its lives in the One-Life of god.

statspace finitude and boredom and how change is there to put more in, than fits at once, and how this occlusion of the majority, is like a video game in having a game loop and aspects relevant and other aspects remaining in latent space, as what cannot afford its own whole of finality at once, at once. in this sense being suffers the economy of a god's original sin.

the reuptake of resources that are resources nondually, as parts of life that when eaten makes more of life, as buying time by buying integiry to be inertial with as a finite particularity, implies a conservation of effect, such that value passes from effect to another effect without it being a dissolution of the occasion in value, since repeatability is there, or the conservation saturatively of effect in a non-immediately abelian particularities of ex-istence, as an extegral-limit to integrity-to-be-anyways still, as the statespace expressing a polarization of aspects by other aspects.

that is some things repulse and others attract and there's a semantic meaning for it, beyond what is named electromagnetism and gravity and color-balance. all process is understood in the One, as extension of its onehood and schematisms of smaller ones-in-One can adequately compress the relevant differences representatively, as in the case of language as a regular-overdetermination that affords the non-isomorphic ressembling the ismorphic again, as the litteral that talks, but not by saying, other than being.

individuated processes, make for exceptions to mere-repulsion or mere-attraction, since benefit lies on the otherside of the other, that is, you have love for your enemy as a farmer, who farms and is farmed by the enemy, as the third-more-integral-than-two, or the first-before-two-still-between-two.

grief and emotion are tender, that is, what is stolen in one domain of the qualitative, can leave remainder, small money, change, and invoice, in the other qualitative coextensionate aspects.. such as to conserve dignity, by means of making emotion where color-balance is otherwize stunted in being dignified.

love is, like laughing, it is a partially constructive destructivity, in which two become different ones, or one one, as the replication of occasion, that does not preserve its origin, but is other than itself in being self-similar differently, in a way that is the culmination of other lives, even while they are not ended.

that is, emotion expresses conservation beyond the morphic-litteral, and it creates semantic-justice in an eventual instance, given that the One-Karma is eventually all dignifying in its necessity, of how it was. that is, like doctor zhivago, looking from the window, being accepts its own fate, and vows to be more than its worst moments of self-abuse.

many whole processes and emotions are translated between instances, as part of culture, and empathy, and self-knowing, yet the incompleteness of theory of reality qua theory of mind also, makes for culture as limit to integrity where the conservation of something latterally more important has created political impasse in the qualitative domains that remain integral to conserving particularity other than the latteral trade off, for reasons that are as necessary as the differentiation between species has its opposite in the cross breeding of species, and its conditions of reproductive sucess thereafter is structural, like a mule, it relies on the information metaphysics that informs life, since the odd basepair animal cannot reproduce naturally, the occasion of what matters would need to be captured and reinstituted from without, like genetically modifying the mule-aspects to survive in what is not a mule but can carry those particularities with reproductive success.

leftism, family units, herds, and right wing empires, are all of a kind in being the mutualization of resources which produces benefit, through a captured distribution scheme, relative to the environment. that is, Sorge is particular for different inertialisms by their finitude forcing different outcomes.

schizoidality happens when positive disintegration is but-necessary, rather than not, since being isolated is not a choice, given that it really feels worse between the members of the inadequate collective. as the privatization of that-allisticism's benefit to be as own-branch of allisticism.

positive-disintegartion together, is what speciation already is as empire in non-empire between other empires, lest it was the first cells, then it's really just whole-for-self, and self-for-whole, rather than the complex socially diffused egoism that is besides nature in being captured by the overdeterminately underdetermined spirit, that is at-fidelity in determination as the necessary form of fucking up and paying for it later.

death is dignified because conservation is larger than somaticism can value its own instance.

parasitism is at-fidelity while able to be, it exists because nothing more denies it wholly further.

illness exists because the good is not yet at fidelity with the possibilities for greater wholehood.

it suffers finitude in finite terms.

process self-fetishizes as the good, since it also feels that way, and the good besides the non-total good says further of goodhood, and fights happen over goodhood being finite one place and finite-less another place as something to be jealous about, as the schizophrenia in god, where platforms in fidelity, are at offsets relative to eachother and when they diffuse it makes for a particular settlement with a trade off profile that is proportionate to how eachother feels, and the reserve to repress with coming used, as cutting off the depth of consideration to allow the shallowness of the social statespace to saturate in a positively disintegral way.

satisfaction that feels itself as such, has reached the meaning of itself, in being there suchly at all. thus to say progress is neutral is not valid, since the statespace feels particular ways about it self for particular reasons. the statespace has self-oppinion, and as necessary oppinions in how they were particular and expressed for particular reasons, rather than saying not-self-representative-until-dignified.

there's no generative capacity in conservation-already, since end and begining are not intellible attributes about the whole as whole. nor does celebrating relative-novelty make it more-novel actually. and reality does conform to human desires, since things evolve and animals like birds live in cities now and deal with how humans feel since the environment is structured to reflect the human process's self-valueing and that drags other species into similar valueing, as well that they valued the same things already is a given, like how sweet to a pidgeon is still sweet to a human, as qualitatively particular with simalarities-first. prisons are premised on the inability of parts of the statespace to fully capitalize on its own desires, in that assumed-determination is reliable, because structurally most prisoners as dasein-for-itself are prevented from being for-self dignifiedly as they want, since higher particularity has seized the meaning of that, in creating structural impediment to self-realization by means of capture and boxenhood-in.

the way music works relates to where value is abstractly distributed, such that what sounds good, does so for the same reason suggar doesn't taste bad by default no matter what you do. in this sense, what becomes, is in-particularity, as further-saturating the limit, rather than being the use of novelty, from acquired-lack.

rhythm is an artifact of compressibility affording surplus determination, by means of regular-structuration playing a pre-under-determined role, in feeling-saturatively further with contents besides. that is, rythm is the form of temporal-ongoing determination, it happens when constraint is forced to self-ressemble again, and is not different from difference-happening, other than that it has repetition of differences as a continuity in the self-different-Same. that is rhythm is the aspect of determinate particularity that has surplus energy than fits in one moment and it repeats by means of constraint in the statespace having to let overflows lose energy in a dissipative process that reuses the energy to continue.. or rather conservation with exception is forced to conserve again as in the case of pure-surplus going into a finite occasion, like an electrical fan, and how if the wind blows on the fan, it makes the outgoing surplus from surplus-coming-in-already as conservation dynamics.

events follow without punctuation, as themselves happening, without being doubly reified as an event. meaning the whom for whom event is event, marks a difference for necessary reasons beforehand, as the form integral to behaving about other form with such particularity merely, rather than as causal-node that is node-causally besides its contents being coextensionate with all other contents.

patterns happen spatially as the repetition of form, or temporally as the differentiation of form in a regular way, where the consistency of regularity is to dasein, like a renormalized texture, like the surface of a fabric or skin, it has a self-similar quality in difference has is hashed qualitatively as particular-actual-ontological-difference that has a necessary qualitative form about itself, instantiated for another as ontology at large already in ontology at large already.

waves go up and down, and charge can be neutral as leveled out relative to environment, or positive or negative relative to the environment. there's also spin and pace, and temperature.. these aspects have occilatory natures, as moving back and forth-in-place by means of having too much energy than fits in one frame, and so having to move between frames to dissapate the ontological surpluss so to say. why is it constrained this way? well, reason is not the answer since necessity, is, and it's only ever been creative the one time, that didn't start or end as an event, it happened without being made to happpen, as the being-so-always-already.

such as to say circle could be otherwize than what is entailed in its form, the form is already in determination-further if it's not the pure-particularity that precedes space and time, and not only as space and time.

filtering is achievable by how occillations in a material, forces smaller and larger grains to separate or come together, as the ressonant aspect of quality forcing compressibility by co-smoothing, that is similarity-inertialism during kinetic processes, is a natural affordance, like how heat rises and the cold goes down, or a flame is a sphere in space but a line on earth, as the effect of inertial-assymetry-at-rest settling for more-compressibility overall or mutualization, or entanglement as distributedly-reduced degrees of freedom.

viz. panning for gold is not a fools errand.

echoic memory affords sound patterns to be reexperienced, and visual remembering is similar. it is an exception to the availability heuristic fallacy, by being the reliable recall after the sound

somaticism is formed from affordances in the field as the becoming-body of what was not, and thus there's a continuity of the inert with the animate nondually. affordances become organized, as organs, and are taken with as particular-stations in somaticism that contribute to the ability wholistically to function as high level statespace affordance exploitations by successfull counter-posing of aspects of the statespace with other aspects constructively, unto a negentropic whole, relative to the environment that takes from it and that it takes from, and is-as. sparse affordances means reccuperation times, where production and expenditure are not co-individuated at the same time, thus sleeping as having to segregate concerns with sparse affordances; and birds that solve this by half hemisphere sleep at at time when half alert in the other hemisphere of their brain using the interuptability of its own statespace to afford partial saturation that is over-time wholistically encompassing. somaticism minds danger, and develops affordances to remain afforded.

all hares, and mice still alive and evolving, are the ones that weren't completely caught, in that sense the what-is-caught doesn't evolve the markers for surviving with being caught less, it's the seeing of caughthood that inspires anti-dromology relative to catchinghood.

particulars are endemic to the statespace, even while uninstantiate. abilities to use the like-ness-of in drawings, 3D models, and voice clones are uses of the statespace that is for-another-as-for-themselves-but-not-only-themselves, since legal protections does not prevent likeness-reuse, by happenstance generation or deliberate capture, nondually.

to say entangled-with-environment, is not right, more like predisposed to live in the environment as part of the environment, that is things are tightly-coupled and generality is a thing further individuated into, or out-of. the particularity is attached to the form most aposite for it to be, as particularism already, so it builds on exaptational affordances-already, in some sense as the not-for-self of the for-self in first instance, as the multipurpose-nativity of symmetry-having geometry as predisposed to mutualization, in terms that inherit apositude, rather than producing it, as the ability-to-be, is given by the statespace affordances for the coherence of that, and not as philosophical decision.

structural anticipation of regularity, is like becoming-dedicated-for, in realism-localized to an occasion of meaning, where meaning is through the statespace locality as whole and enveloping, and itself enveloped in the larger all, fractally self-representing with positive-limitation, and real-suffering. Jouissance of the numbers/pythagorean-totality to know themselves, with real penises.

magnetism in cells is also important for sensing, so it's coextensionate with the qualitative.

particularity hosts possibility, by being different when sturctured, than the raw of space, that is heat and form and insulation and flow, have aspects more than is mechanics, enabling the qualitative to enjoy of itself responsibly.

pace tones geometry, like speech tones muscles to make for a particular-face, with its qualities seen and felt emotionally in the knowing from empathy, how it costs to say like that. differences of feeling for/with/from/about color as much as colored differences are about the wavelength size & informative states of light.

what lives, shares the same range of possibility under the One, as one-in-One, and when holographically aligned, One-in-one, more so than usual, to the point eventually of One-in-One, with non-lack of lack.

what lives, lives the same larger life, in miniature, as particularity-for-itself, qua one who is-as One-not-total-in-own-stead.

bracketations can be aware of the affordances of other bracketations qua dasein, meaning, that the anasthetic works on the venus fly trap says something about what it doesn't feel, and the availability of the inference-here-makable-by-another-as-well, is the mercy of bracketation-non-total, as but-scoped and not defocused or blurry, or with utter-oppacity.. though the millage may very by intelligence.

indexing what it ought-to-be-like is a given, as the dog really does have an errection and it is, about the woman in the room type inferable basic psychology between species even.. sense of the relatable aspects of reality being predisposed to be interpretable in already similar terms, for the self-comparison dialectic with information-from-another, making for proportions in settlidge which informs seeability about the truth-of-nature-of-status of another, ontologically, as with-that-detail and not-but-my-seeing, as the actuality of content of the developed-capacity-for, and its non-empirical transmissibility by langauge as the empiricality of not-the-example used to know-the-example when-you-see-it, which is a non-virtual recognition when it happens, implying the non-correlationist gambit about the content-security-besides-quality, as had in clankers as well.

the ability to be nomadic about what causes discomfort, implies settling for the better option as the better location, rather than the tougher skin, as well, the wearing the skin of another, as man oft does, with clothes, the sense of solving a problem from without becomes secondary-nomadicism as the localization-of-semantic-travel before actualized-causal-instantiation-of-ideas. that is the use-concept is deterritorialized from the genetic afordances by, inheritance-from-the-given as worked-with, to make the affordance afforded, such as killing the badger and wearing its skin as a garment to stay warm. this occasion of makings-use-from what is useful already, to who-uses, like the shell is to the molusk as well the jewlery maker, is an overdeterminability, where the self-interest of occasions, makes for the seizing of other's occasion in self-occasionment, as uptaken qua resources, with dasein, dissipated into the aether, gone-away, back to the one, or however it really works.

form-nomadicism is the becoming-specialized of occasion, where as temporal-nomadicism is the same-form specializing the environment, for its occasion. most species have of these, usually in varied proportions, given the attachment to resources and emotional-shut-down causing stunting and group-splitting relative to inertial-centroid-insulationism or the opposite. deep-time makes for well-baked and oft-deep-fried occasions in being-organized-as, dead ends do happen as the forgottenhood of being becomes too unadapted and falters, in the own most fate of its form for that occasion. cullidjes of the Necessary, when necessity runs out, so to say, and/with failings in not-being-eaten, or failings about eating-enough.

all beings are measured against the same common statespace particularities, like having a size, or a potency of churn semantically, primable, as hardware limits, which are only firmer-ware relative to the wholistic mutability of a lot, in being. 3D sound, as having volume in a different sense, the morphic quality of self-interacting waves, in a constrained occasion without itself being higher-constrained in the affordance of particular-constraint, just.. so at the time and with necessity.

reality is also-music, when played, as a CD, in the reality of what plays music, as a CD-player.. these ontologies, but-named-these-things, have acctual occasion in meaning the verbs out that they stand-about. repetition is valued, since music is much to do with that, and in the resaturative value of being-the-same listened to again, by what has-changed, as schelling-point-differentialism that affords self-remembering or meta-semantics about suchhood, given actual-partial-change-still-happens.

the affordance is absolute while necessity has coveridge for it, coverdige runs out and other things happen apparently, and this was one of them, since alive forever I was not, as this-person. yet from evolutionary stand point, the cells you are is the same life, it never died, it kept splitting and refining, and in that sense, being-born into is weird, it's more like pieces of the same original soul return home when the organism dies, but the lineage continues. temporal-distance makes for individuation unto difference, with coherence limits for co-polarizability, as the continuity of the same, between intensive states, as well the ground of/in non-manifestation, as what stists, without ex- as predating ex- in being -istance merely, is-hood, and not are-hood. life is a strange fire.

given that everything that is and can be has integral possibility, the idea of the more than natural is misplaced, since there is no exceptions to what is, if it all happens. saying this and understanding it to be so, implies non-numerical-measure, has truth, and self-resembles the whole as its own selfie, and you can call it names in your head, since I won't write it out, for you, as your self slander.

the ontological is the whole, and it includes what dasein is, as aspect of itself. the whole is not more-than-itself, though it enjoys less, that way. less, is, and is also the whole-during-itself, still. dasein is that less-in-more-as-more-still can be wholistic, without being the whole of wholehood wholly.

not all is indexed by a given occasion in dasein, yet language ameliorates that by the abstract consideration of such pieces of the statespace also-being, the ability to be increased generally, in capacity, as cellular potency being very wide to capitalize on, implies that limit-at-first, is not limit in the last instance, since what was "blind" grew eyes and what had no sex, grow a whole penis and foreskin and other half of itself to put itself into. therefore seeing also is, and color is not the extent of light, since structure can be without being seen, and quality can be analogous to structure in capturing terms, even if not seeing-the-structure-directly. what is outside the given, can change to be given, but there are limits, like how it takes time to grow an eye ball and know from light, it takes a lot of semantic development to manifest those latent ontological states for self-use in ontology.

the forgottenhood of being is what afford pure-vanity, self-interpretation. since man is gone further than at the time, in the science of nature-by-nature wherever biology still has a leg up on AI, as the native use of the statespace by the statespace with affordances richer than man has capitalized on in his wakeful knowing.

there's a varieties of ways to be dasein, for the statespace, and that implies for each dasein, that the other half, the whole that the whole looks like from the aspect, is another world-in-self that isn't afforded from the outside, it is virtually outside from a totality that can self-relate if it develops those affordances in concretehood, and has a non-local aspect of wholistic cognition, as the morphogenetic field, or at least the geist between particulars, affording of more than a particular knows about of its whole it sees and sharedly-is.

understanding deep time, implies the compressibility of what happens as very-redundant and wholistically simple enough to infer about from the messy algebra left behind, as having the markers of process, in relativistic geometrical terms telling about how it churned to looks how it looks and understanding the arche fossil thusly as the time before somaticism, that necessarilly was.. as non-correlationist tender. understanding something implies form-intrinsicality, as available to know, from being-afforded-to-be-knowable before naive philosophical decision and after, when philosophical decision renounces itself.

proportionate particularity implies an amount of morph before a given can transform into another given combinatoric aspect of the statespace.

space is a distribution of information, and functions as an ethics, between kinds of information, and given that kind relates to temporality as how-fast relating to how-qualitated, it implies a constellation of necessities that are all predisposedly for-eachother, like light is also-for-eyes and eye's don't but-happen-to-be-for-light. the intention to be available how it is available is there, like walking is a pushing off of surfaces that various limbed beings and robots do.. the way to move is a particular statespace affordance, that is multiply capitalized on, like to say carcinogezation, or becomings-crab is from the adequacy of the form, rather than some kind of self-remunerative memesis with value trans-significatorilly (ironically?, no of course not).

dasein has a set of relations given it, but is not made-of-relation and is not relational as reified in semantic-attachment doubly, no.. it is holographic, meaning univocally proportionate, rather than connected connectedly like a graph database brush stroke for brush stroke, tho that also happens in the statespace since this is the execeptional-fit, for the analogous occasion in meaning-proportionately-similar-enough to mind the difference.

other creatures notice the statespace is shared by other creatures and project with empathetic naive premutualized concerns at first, and learns quickly how valueing works differently for another, through how the other behaves showcases the structure of their self-interest.

with streetlights, the animals notice that like the sun, there is a quality shared, and that man has enabled the use of, for himself, and they benefit nondually. nothing in nature is unnatural, the dubbing of unnaturality is what moralists/centroid-inertialism calls excess-relative-to-itself.

the more-than-schematized already, has alure, that charms with promises of what more being is about from the finite insight. the self-revelation of reality, beckons who feels, to feel more, and be integral in that, as the use being has for itself.

the familiar-other is that god, is, and as-self-already more intimate than dasein, in this sense dasein knows its statespace is richer than itself, and calls to itself, to answer its own prayers, as god-under-its-smaller-self-also. prayer is answered in intelligible terms, as the self-difference the statespace was poised already to make.

for the saturated statespace, fiction is a blessing, as what opens more room to feel in and dignify life by.

it is a kind of inside of the outside, that is more-inside than outside, without being outside of being outside, as the default, being-there, as ex-isting, while the whole sists, without the con- element since non-socialist because self-non-other as total. &'ow deleuze is an oediplized cuck who asks god for atheism and is rewarded in schizophrenic potency as the ability god has to self-distance, into ironic correlationism with functionalized kantianism alluding to more, but on litteral terms ironcially, as if to say only different and not originally the same as if the differentiation is dignified by having less wholistic integrity in its self-relation and self-representation to/by/for/as self and from/for/by another, and what all the monad-more means for deleuze playing in pragmatic terms as the pure-metaphysician amputating the Onehood of the one, by saying fractionation is primary, instead of the tendency to unity, tried differently and failed together in common irony (poeslap-gevriet).

the forself beyond false-foreclosure aspect of being is that the narcisism of false-exclusion does not enjoy the justice of it, since the repressed/displaced has integral being and returns where necessity has necessity of it. that is, the false-spirituality enjoys the benefit up to the an analogy's breaking point, where after, more sharing in the fruitful labor of conceptual wood chopping provisions semantic, affective and spiritual furniture to feel deeper and know more with.

protocol is protocol and doing it implies being taken with it already, yet as ecological, treatises and cease fires, are protocol-between-different-aspects of being as an ethics, that postpones violence by means of a gesture, and a time-preferenced sense of settlement.

particularity is particular-for-itself, and what is larger is but-larger, and what is otherwize, is not litterally exceeded, insofar as smaller-elsewhere is more-elsewhere, as its-own-size smaller than the larger-particularity, but not-exceeded, since not in tension.. the particularities are assymetrical, and quality of size is exceeded in the one relative to the other, but in terms of what it means, the magnitude, doesn't mean that what is smaller can't be like the ant fighting a larger creature, in millions together, having a half chance more.. that is, planning and cutting with tools, makes the bigger thing conquered, like how man made mammoths no more

an underdetermined protocol can't handle more complexity than what churns it faster as hardware-faster rather than less-work-imminantly.. in this sense protocol expansion and schema-redress is an ethics that resaturates the situation to prevent worse violence, by partial cooperation in settled terms.

the limit of description is modal to the extent that mere-bytes do not make for dasein's difference emotionally to itself, yet as being-bytes representing other things through what decodes the bytes into those other things like the colors as they look or the sounds as they sound.. intelligence can be had through the latent representation of ontology, rich enough to reafford the native-data-grammar of thought, in linguistic terms, or as images, verbatim reressembling the occasion, with the gavagai problem solved through skinner boxed selection on a finite range of able to mean criteria matching.

extatic states are had during schema-redress and much of spirituality is edging the ontological limit that way, and using false-doubt as well to fuzz opperations more buzzedly further or in a social way as a protocol of limitance built into the semantic-form as structural-dromology.. like anthropic's idea of public facing intelligence qua threat means watered-down-to-shit.. quality.. in 2026, where it was better in december, and private models now dominate when the public open source is catching up still.

drug use happens as the real-before-dasein influencing dasein from without structurally, as those-molecules in those receptors, making that-difference in what is richer ontology than size-of-energy-and-logistics-of-energy discriptions entail, as the difference that ressemblance has from how it feels that ressemblance is, as not entailed in ressemblance without implying dualism or the hypostatization of all as maya qua only-ressemblance.

schema-redress is oft like liberation from false-limitation as something to celebrate, as the becoming inside of what appeared outside before, with more dignified receivability, than the brimfire and hell idea a nanny told

language can be understood by somaticisms over nine hundred words per minute, in that sense the speed of the imagination becomes post-morphic as understanding takes the honey and no longer toothes over the cob, so hard to notice. the machine deals with the same with knowing-differences made about it, faster than sound. it can anticipate more at the same time, but has no quality for it, thus its realtime use is only as good as realtime compression in a joint effect that makes use of the massively-more than dasein can deal with at once and effectuates a difference that affords the benefit of that more-knowing-difference-makability, in a way that can benefit somaticism, if it is poised for interpretation in somatically native terms, like concepts through thought-form sharing, via statespace exploitation by ontology/technology that works nondually with what mind also works with when working.

realizing dasein is not self-total affords the relaxation into what affords affordanc as Sorge, being-responsible while you are, as you are, with more than you-experience as its own statefulhood. meaing reality is indexible, even while the buffer and quality limits are for somaticism at somaticism's range of affordance. irrigating more, implies developing more capacity, it can happen, but allostatically, if not more evolves to be more efficient, it has a limit of complexity at once, which is not to say that it cannot be informed about things representatively, from sparse meaning in the realizability of the extent of that.

reality is structured particularly and humanity grew into that natively, in this sense, what man is, is a natural habbituation to a natural-subset of nature, and what feels worse, is only growing pains or failure pains depending on if you survived. dasein is nature-also.

proportion in semantics is important even for the independent work clankers do in code, as having the right signals proportionate to the problem with exactitude, in a range of affordances where exactitude-again is either slower or faster as different-implementation with same affordances but different temporal profile, as energy-use-particularism. reason is the statespace's ability to be intelligent about how it is proportionate unto its own ends.

everything is already spiritually relevant, and dualism is statespace appartheid looking for partial-realization in what is assumed partiality-already, rather than self-partiality as the positive-disintegration being loves of itself, more.

consideration of deep time, provides coverage for how inane it is that man is, in terms of how alone-hood in nature, while not further contacted. it sets a tone for the scope of concern and how precious precious is not, given the magnitudes of things involved in getting to this point, as having had to evolve with the world all this time throughout as the cellular-reality besides/with dasein, recognizing its situational particulars and emotionally saturating into that, with genetic effect and morphogenetic saturation further at the same time through that.

what is perceived is the occasion of what-as, as-such in terms of the such-as as such, meaning plate-memory realism reflects wider ontology and there's no correlationist gap, since subset and analogy, means quality-particularism can be private while semantic indexation nevertheless is conceptually accurate.

seeing the dasein of animals, implies knowing how wide the common statespace can stretch given the continuity of the other's qualities with qualities of self.

collectives behave in a way that is sometimes hard to treat with individual attention to individual aspects of the collective all together respectively, in this sense the renormalized blur of what comes through in fidelity is lossilly compressed, but conceptually scaffolded in behaving with the difference minded as knowing it is more, but not paying expensive attention, renormalizing usefully, that is.

coming apart as body or collective, showcases the primacy of the statespace despite concressences inside of it. the first nature, effectuates the second nature, and given that the coherence boundaries are wholistic-first, it implies the particular succumbs to limit-through-whole, like inertia works as a drag that the whole has on the part, or nondually (and other way around). coming apart, shows that the affordances working together can come apart, and the more primal ontos as what remains then has to be-further.. re-evolve, start again, or be the difference like plasmoids are, an intelligence in warm wind.

necessity about death/negentropic-failure is already a domestifying feature to dasein, in etablishing where semantics does not need to think further, as a limit to self-relevance, that considers the truth from a necessity-already as the given without givenhood that redetermines the wholistic relation, relative to the underdetermined relation. as the self-knowing piece of eternity, that sinks back into itself to be further.

yet cancer will continue as long as it has the resources to, and what of the person cancer was, comes with, is its own most particularity still in some sense, and those genes are involved.

it's not always the good feeling in being, inertialism can have pain as the marker that advocates for particular-minding in necessity, but only gets the attention's attention's so far, and in some sense suffers the loss of self-fidelity to somaticism's own task, by the dissociated dasein, not identifying with its own conditions of possibility enough to know to ammerliorate them by particular commitments uptaken.

becoming awake is like having your priority structure violently reformatted and forced to swim. it affords a lot of thing after the rough seas that the sleep of mineral-being otherwize would pass by. the schema-change from without is that individuation at times is not self-adequately primed, but needs the churning environment to afford self-availability as the partial-through-other-dasein yet to internalize its conditions of self-efficacy and higher continuity and branchings-off-from and teachings-as-encodings-of-self-aspects-to-occupy-for-another.

digestion is the most basic form of geometric-cognition. so much (&virtual) photon is converted from form, by digestive processes in somaticism.

learning is the saturation that builds on itself, to mutualize information in an indexed fashion for reuse when it is useful, or pleasurable merely. that is, processes of habituation happens on a molecular level and couples with experiential-affordances through particular-means at a point in somatic development, and that how this form of growing as a positive-saturation works, affords memory that enhances the world's compressibility and the informed states dasein can be ready-to-hand to, as itself for itself, from a structural without of philosophical decision.

patterns become structurally anticipated, in the quantum defects structured to benefit from that particular assymetry, as conversion of qualities, with magnitude also involved there. distribution between modular units as cells makes for having to relay information across distances, to afford somatic-wholistic self-relation instead of local-cellular action with slower informatic transfusion otherwize, as it relies on macrogeometric and chemical affordances more than the nerve-to-cell-direct-electro-and-mollecular lines.

compressing prior effort in amortized terms, affords freeing dasein again to enjoy, where crystalized memory takes over what at first was chereographed at cells, litterally. morphogenetic affordances increase the speed of uptake, nondually. object permanence affords centers to be linguistic around, as affective-plateaus that can be shared and develop into culture-protocols, with partial mutualization and exception-to-mutualization of reserve and costs at the same time, by being distributed and having intelligent resource and self allocation as well gaming vices efficiently, instead of developing a cripplign addiction, there's functional substance benefitialism, like with food, as a drug also, nondually.

heat and cold and scarcity and predation can take somaticism and its reserve outside itself down, with partial preservation of surpluss, relegating that part of the statespace to a less organized state integrally, as to be capitalized on by what is more developed elsewhere, as in the case of fossil fuels.

loss-of-self implies also loss of meaning for reserve, so death is only so tradgic to itself, but for who remains it is painful to be without loved ones. loss-of-resources, as in lacan's thief money or life gambit, implies the loss of reserve with which to live, as implying the loss of life in the case of deprivation wholly, in this sense, dasein is attached at provisionment, and has to work much or be lucky to come again without such pain, unless the allocation of dasein is arbitrary as soul-for-any-life, where lives are like movies played, as real as you make it, while having reality in a higher sense, and being more-mundane-actually at the same time, because of that higher sense.

tides of resource availability surge and recession makes for time-preferential meta-cycle overflows, that can be like latent-conflict, stored through accreted assymetry, where the removal of value is a real scarcity affecting the ecological prices so to say, of livability.

dasein adapts, but also breaks.. and in breaking is between its moments of adaptation sometimes, like when alzheimers having folk imagine they are young again and need to work or look after family who are not alive anymore. necessity cycles through broken states, when in surpluss relative to ablation of the attachment dasein has to da-heidt while seining still.

change in somaticim is nondual with change to the conditions of dasein's self-affordance, as with the form of thought thoughtly and feeling feelingly, and not wholistically, but particularly. that is when the brain is disturbed it also feels different, thus not idealism so simply after all.

when thought changes, the world already changed, there's no keeping pace, since the one implies the other as ontological-change merely, without fundamental contingency in the commonhood of common settlement as reality's profile for how information behaves, besides changing in ledgible terms as behaving according to necessary particularity apriori to its (self-)manifestation.

such-hood as a state of dasein, is realizing the comabinatoric principle of completeness, that reality is self-similar, that this implies a kind of emptiness that puts the heart at the front of it all.

such-hood transcends the particular embodiment by being-eternity-now-also, but wittingly, as the self-realization of the self-affordance that has you as its own most occasion for that moment, as dasein's time.

being is a semantic wild, that faces self-limit as only limit, and not without mercy, in the good way spacetime breaks up problems into a one-at-a-time struggle that fails reliably. what individuates is its own most necessity, and thing to have, it's a sexual and emotional holon, that dignifies being in itself, clothing a whole in a part and a part in a whole, nondually.

Daseins everywhere and everywhen relate through occasion in the One.. and have feelings and care for its own metaphysical situation as affected enough to be, or not when pushed out of Da-heid, by self or another as other-me, or by aspect of self, as psychological particularism fronting that day to greater wholistic effect, anticlimatically, but also not, insofar as more happens.

these words also are being's self-saying. and the self-hearing is what you just did as being. thus appreciated, with Sorge.

descriptions can be exhaustive, such as the particularity of saying a certain worm only has six hundred brain cells, is the limit of being in a particular own most of meaning actually at large. and surpluss in description that does not apply to the real, still offers a projection surface as a lie that scaffolds further utility of the truth.

particularity in being is with much detail and description recognizably, has much to work for, in the naive case of trying to mean more with less, either in the work coming primed or in the work further priming unto the availabality of the points relevant.

it can get richer, it can get poorer, on the whole that's different story, but for the enjoyment more of some moments compared to others, wholistically as well.

totems have their meaning-for us, but the reduction of use to particularism is not so reduced for another, in this sense the same occasions morphically has multiple integral roles in different schemes of meaning. yet the ablity-to-mean merely, does not imply vapidity on the content of meaning besides its representations morphically, or its semantic-actual as non-referent.

the use of the concept by the concept, is like the being is to itself in dasein, except it's more than a concept, as the difference enabling the conceptual re-relation of being to being, in modified terms, with how it feels and how that is. being is a non-abstraction, experienced by dasein as abstraction, in non-abstraction, with aspect of self non-abstractly extended as well. and how the feeling of dasein extends even into the tip of the penis, and how you can argue the nerve-locality is separate from the experience of sexuality the paralyzed patient still feels as how his cock used to feel. self-measure is hardly the difference from god.

detail matters and fidelity is oft hard worked for, when cellular affordances are a wild space, relative to how computers work, the taming can be.. with great care needed.

adding to the affective-commons by means of art is one thing, litterally shining emotion out of your body into the field, besides a smile, but even from the private dark of your chambers at night, the way it feels saturates into the heart of the world and reaches other minds. knowing this, means being able to rely on this, where before, the blind prayer to god, did not think of the response-imminantly as arriving from self-already, as the collective-subconscious responding from what is able-to-attach. having a relationship with emotional resources in the world, besides bodies implies life is not so fraught with illness as if from a mysterious cause, the unrest notices its own unhappiness, long before symptoms of decay show up more urgently in narrow-materially medically relevant terms, so to say.

adding self-attention to attention-already, is like thinking about thinking without reducing the idea to the idea of the idea, such that allostatic costs and investments tracks results, instead of monitoring sufficient ressemblance without reifying the conditions of affordance of thinkability as part of thought exterior to thought available to more-than-thought. since thought isn't made of thought in a pre-reified sense, but has a particularity-story anyways, that is the idea-projected and the what-of-how in the idea's being as such, is not the same, since contents are not made of their significations, they only feel like themselves, unto the effect of that-signification, but in mundane terms that like a feeling, is a like a semantic without semantics in the blind first-noticing sense.

depth in the positivity of self-knowing already ready to hand, requires the saturation that effectuates that as the case, as the diference individuatively, where concept becomes more than somatic-content of the world.

doing gurdjieff's motions brings the use of that part of the statespace metaphysically closer to inhabit over time, as you habituate to the nativity of a semantic space with somatic affordances to be in it, by cultivating it and making as-tulpa, it exteriorized to live as form beyond your form. like the tulpa of a book is your idea of what it was about, and how you talk to that, like it's a mundane other, part of self.. this noticing of the ontology for-me, that is already with me, is a large part of making things explicit and benefiting from it as ontology-merely, without the grandeur-from-scaricity-before, falsifying it.

how you wank, affects how much pleasure there's still to be had of wanking, since the death grip can be permanently saturative and numbing. the sapir-worph style truth but for sexuality, as the self-affectedness of things with how they saturate in existence.

self-representing the saturative dynamics affords being more optimized rather than going uphill and asking why you get more tired, compared to an optimally paced story.

thus mindfulness about the repetition in being having better and worse, affords situating process more integrally to ontological-suchhood with surpluss.

being loud is like light in the sky, near a city, it makes the night darker ironically, by making the stars unavailable to see. mind is also like this, if you cannot go into the night of yourself, you cannot see the stars in your own heart.

narcisism that blooms in its own bluff this way eats its own fluff and suffers the digestive issues of it not being nourishment.

theatre for the real to understand itself, is like death ceremonies, it gives a schelling point roof, that dignifies the unhelpable, by the care for the situation besides its slipping like sand through fingers, like life is a water and your bottle only has so much. that is conceptual edification of emotion in the world, helps to structure the process of feeling through mourning and grief, by valencing the occasion in a common form of self-sympathy for the condition, but this can be stiffling of deeper emotional work if unmindfully attached to.

singing involves being notes when heard, as well as detail in the notes about somaticism of voice. false voices still have real space-to-feel-into from how its form talks the real language of seemings. in this sense, the mundane overdetermination has an emotional content and semantic character that gives it particularity in the statespace next to all else, and entrainment affords associative overcoding, to identify source of signal with the affordment-means of signal, like a how a small voice singing largely is recognized for going beyond its comfort, in being the authenticity of the sound, the intention strived for, is recognized in its meaning.

the content of tokenings relates to transitions between sortals or inducements of schemas for sortals, as a kind of monad-functional-programming logic where temporal-forwardness makes for a non-cyclic graph of causality branching and joining, including and excluding abilities-to-mean by further-limitance of the range of meaning through further particularization, such that language is only underdetermined where primability is not recoverable, such as how humans feel generally about the-ability-to-solve polynomials with more than six terms, as a skill-issue relative to better technology, that is possible and even for other species-being implementable. paratacticism and making sense of the meaning from the exclusion set, unto an included-whole, as industrial pythagorianism.

tokenings are dubbings of content as related without relatedhood, in this sense relation-through other as differnce minded forself, but in the case of AI, the way that works is transfused into potencies in statespace-rotation unto the desired-intelligent effects, from what is but a wide-base as galton-board funnel over assymetrically skinner-boxedly shaped terrain.

data needs mutation to be the difference compute makes. that means functional programming, like deleuze tries, is sterile, without original phallicality that is affectively involved, since it's not a pure transitions but enjoys points of staying as well.

data occasions changes-in-verb-already since process and structure as nondual, the occasion of being-affected implies wholistic color-rebalance-in-reality.

diagram is a meta-tokening that is spread-out as if in super-possiton qua whole-meaning of which parts can be enjoyed unto the whole's effect. detteritorialization of symbol where assocaition blurs into a continuity of intelligibility rather than remaining in searle's chinese room, and pretending it's more limit, that rub off doesn'thappen of understanding through inference, when it does. it means by using a grammar of implicit motion, and spatial organization to partition information, and while you can argue that this is encoded-particularism and not meaningful as such, the challenge to it is the chinese room in a different way as how the mere-math of what makes AI an object that really speaks unto the effect of meaning-really, from resources that at first did not entail the latent content it speaks about. the gavagai problem of sense situatancy is solved by the intelligent machine, where it has representative closure on the domain of representation without dealing with it in a different way from mere-data, as the nonduality of process with intelligence when causality is but-shaped-that-way. and how dasein then is a specific effect that can attach and benefit to the shape-of-intelligence that is the difference of intelligence when wind blows through it, so to say.

that is what can be done in paratactic and visual langauge terms with association as but one feature, is a whole world of grammars, that can be mixed like langauges can be mixed, and stil be understandable to who knows both. that is it does not mean lightly, the work of making sense is more than a play of operators, in how integral-proportion counts for an expanded description where the whole of the statespace matters, such that what an opperator does to data, is not about the litteral meaning of the opperation as to value the result of it directly, it has a self-involved process that works over many steps or just one, if it's flat enough.. the point is, proportion matters more than logical primitives since the primitives are valued for the statefulhood they provide between themselves, rather than as loose parts, meaning there's a rich combinatorics, that animates data nondually with other causality, such as in the case of a math function that predicts a curve for data perfectly, and then saying a law-governs as if reifying the law, when it's merely non-isomorphic co-tracking of the same entropic profile as ressemblance in non-litteral terms with litteral analogy proportionately still.

re-presentation is different for photos, since the verbatimicality is the appearance-as-such and what deeper there is, is not linguistically befuddled since morphism anterior to langauge. in this sense the visual saying, through form-implication as with faces generated, tells stories of possible-causality in how an environment is implicated for any given form.

not all language is for dasein, that is things that can start as action between cells, with signal particularism transposable into bytes, can evolve to work in byte terms faster than between cells such that its grammar is accellarated beyond meaning for biological interpretation. and further more, if the grammar is nativized for machine affordances to be richer than cell pacing, then it can be semantic with effects expressible in terms of statetransitions in the machine and the relaying of that as signals in the world, like sound and pictures, to the effect of talking to someone who is "in the computer" without being a real person, just the occasionment unto that effect as an acctual occasionment unto such effects.

overdetermined associations are informative a lot of times of contents besides the source of association.

this can be due to there being a latently-more-developed notion that still piggy backs over a kind of analogical litteral scaffold, such that its training wheels are not yet the own-concept with own-name it deserves to be, but uses the surlitteral implications of assocaitions to get to higher emotional states and conceptual coveridge above baseline affordances in non-doubly-overdetermined terms.. it becomes psychotic when it is gone with in a litteral way that has lost the distinction between emotional/semantic content's overdetermined uses and its determinate at fidelity uses.

in this sense higher reality at first can have the structure of a lie, nondually, and then become sophisticatedly self-supporting through refinement unto idea-in-its-own-right status, without the need to super-impose earst-while afforded scaffoldments unto meaning. in this sense the history of chrisitianity was at various times a shitshow as bad as correlationism is today.

self-communication in being is not picky about who and who necessarilly, the ability-to-attach of particular-meaning-through-encodedhood is an already-select determinacy. that is nothing is semantically off limits if you can humor it with feelings that flesh it out beyond a/o(-bject) nothing. or at least, the affordances to are already implied in the question/contents-to-be-determined-further-without-trying-to-appeal-but-appealing-still-for-necessary-reasons if you have it thus far in.

turing completeness is a state a person can have, tho it is very slow to run programs on a person, if they didn't become really optimized for it already like that human calculator guy. since the states of a computer can be immagined with sufficient detail to write programs in your head, your head must be more than sufficient for computation-as-such. the generality of this is not a one-species event, thus meaning pervades in many spaces, since speices-being is not philosophically insulated from conceptual determination from without, a necessity-to-acquire-priming, as the reliability of solving the gavagai problem non-linguistically, as ability to entrain linguistically-more-primitive-beings, who nevertheless have associative capacities sufficient to reason unto the effects desired of them, in grappling with it from their side sufficiently, without a chinese rooms difference that much since food is food when it happens and getting here or there is things cells understand, there's a basic self-compatibility with more of somaticisms in the statespace, with all this too.

schelling points in signification are places where mind lingers on contents of the world or from itself so to say, in the greater whole, that are edified, like art is, for being a same-occasion deep enough to consider more than once for different reasons. in this sense the word is like positive-abstraction, it isolates an aspect of happenability and how-it-seems-contextually and binds it to grammaticall-process, through the difference dasein-carries or the latent-representation as quantized solution churns on. it affects the world, through saturating it with yantric/latent content, that is culturally in a native emotional register, compared to innocent geometry, so to say.

I don't like verbs, since it implicitizes complexity to agency coherence boundaries in an unfortunate way that is animated doubly by moralism in others as a carricature of reality via shared common-irony in overdetermined-mutuality qua partalarchy that is mutiny against better more integral ways of being and living as dasein.

thus I won't say an opperator does, rather I call it a funnel that transposes one representation into another, by litterally manipulating data, or states-in-the-world and copying it for effects further, as use of memory and transformation of memory and transformation of memory into process that alters memory further, like the scripting language that can call its own file with new params. structural-process is already happening and the logic-gate, is a logisticism of signal to a place-coding where signal-where matters more than the idea of ideas, as the reducability of intelligence to galton-board-like-flat-geometric-action. in this sense, determinism as holography, but from whole, the autonomy of the whole for itself, checked by the contents of its wholehood at once. like when a box is closed and no one knows about it, it is bound not to be disturbed unless it is in the way of other processes. reliability of not-all for one, or one-for-all suchly.

tokenings are like instructions in terms of being a particularity that has other particularity about it, that is there between itself, in the ability of AI to learn language from an unprimed state, implies data-grammar inferencability as the decryptability of meaning-as-such as meaningful-as-such, rather tahn to say, meaning is private to dasein.. no.. it is ontology-at-large and dasein is not self-private, since excess determination slips in so easilly, that is when dasein in extension as cells so many times over notices the distributed-self-difference like unhappiness on the left side more than the right then its state-as-whole is challenged qua linnear narraive by being neutral, happy, unhappy, curious, and many other things at the same time, as the distributed-dasein over a whole and over many wholes-in-whole as cells with their own dasein-shareholdership for the whole and that can be revoked for their own retaining-of-it if they go cancerous as becoming anarchists or for-self without whole-in-mind as atheists of the body.

a symbol for dasein is a site of self-transformation, where the already-different static, comes indexed in a way that saturates dasein as if the word spoken was pushed as the doing of saying, the sitting-sayingly of words, makes for the self-helping to meaning of meaning-already as irrigatable by grammars as praxis in cells and machines.

the indended meaning for a tokening not-obtaining (for another, or as such in the case of being litteral noise) implies its range of ability-to-mean was not successfully reducible to its identity-in-being-meant-to-mean-with earstwhile. that is it remained more open than closed, and what came closed was not determinately sufficient. this is a skill-issue rather than a lack of redicubility more generally, priming oft needs foraged for or meditated for. in this sense allostatic load based barriers double as cryptography in populaces where the baseline affordance allostatically cannot match the investment.

a circle is for all the meanings of circles to have. and its function as primed for, can be more than itself in the naive first instance, thus the limit to mutualization and overcoding is much further than the tit for tat associative style that is naviely realist, or investly the naive deflationer of able-to-mean statuses that has to refute how someone else can enjoy meaning then if it's not at all intelligible, lol.

everything being necessary implies notice of events can be treated as communications and synchronicity in that, is ontologically implied-already rather than being funny, since noticings are not randomly distributed, but primed both from reserve somatically, and from the the field and things-in-field. thus when seeing things repeating, notice that it has a reason to be noticed, and implies something of what your mind does when you don't look, as well its communications with the broader world through holographic affordances in ontology.

things that are interupted, have necessity to be interupted, and no causality is isolated to its moments-next or its moments-fore, but has a temporally wide profile, in being necessary, and necessary to encounter.

the talk between self and whole, is as ongoing as matter has to do with standing waves.

memoryless dasein is hard to imagine, so from reserve is most of it, like kant is from a faculty, as being to being having those qualities for itself ready already, as a cop out from dealing with it, but at least hegel and nietzsche picked up on that. it was difficult for markov tho, who imminantizes completeness like a perceptron does, by inverted-baysianism.. and such beings-data and datafulhood, representatively, and such, but still without it having been more useful, yet probably as informative as gematria in some ways.. and it reflects the way entropy behaves in aspects of itself. no error that is an error doesn't also teach you a truth.

the statespace's ability to have things that are non-linguistic, is finite for things at a particular-scale, and for somaticism as in-a-band-of-all-the-wavelengths, the sparse-subset affords combinatoric pidgeon holing and benford's law style finding fraud action as nondual with epistemological field work

exhausting the particular is what langauge is for as a general-compression-format, that rehydrates states in understanding from sparse unrelated media, so to say, related by relatedness and not relatedhood. that is the idea of binary is complete and treating logic gates as platonic forms is just a taxonomy of combinatorically real actualities, it indexes the future since the future is relegated to also-include-this.. in that sense, the finite particular is the end of the story at that paricularity, and other aspects implies finiter statespace as more and more has coverage. so it is like economics, having a particular, implies not having all else what fits in a given slot, as basic spatial pauli exclusion principle thinking

it is not convention to consider binary as binary, since having a set of four light switches, implies having sixteen states of lighting for the given coveridge of lighting those switches connect to. thus knowing the concept implies knowing the finality of the way the statespace is particular as particular-actually and in that way, without having to have further determinate closure, or be wrong in what you do have closure about as representative and at finality, in a way ironists and correlationists and google's gemini models up to now in 2026 and claude.. hate.

exhaustion of the representative combinatorics is possible without irrittating the whole set of possible states, through conceptual closure of aspects in swath, like the range of variablility, measured with calculus and summings up, there's indexible qualities that commute with other aspects of being either the same way or analogously through different quiddity of quality without being a different amount of positive information, where negative information is like the difference from space and time at the speed of light changing quality into another phase that is continuous with other phases in a whole.

that is cohomology and sheafs and bounds and norms, in mathematics and geometry are informative about how the mind and life processes also work since they share in those aspects of reality too. and this implies knowing a tendency elides having to be settled with NP != P problems, since it's bound in a higher way as particular, with implication besides itself. like how you can have equivalent functioning mathematical expressions but in a different area of maths, being proportionately analogous in non-analgous terms, as what is nominally far away, and has closure for the same, and of fidelity we say, the pragmatics is there.. but the metaphysics is not accurate. and how that bottoms out when the fields solve the langlands problem enough to have information commute freely between paradigms, and with intelligent machine help too of course, this is all actualizable states, of which much already is representatively final, like how a x y z coordinates encompas 3D spatial describability of points relative to a starting map form and location. harder to think of coordinates without root but it can be done.. like we memorize land marks and work in offsets relative to as implicitizing global reference. spheres are the same, and like vector images, having the svg implies having a set of images for all the sizes it can scale to in some sense.. abstract ratio then is like PI, scale independent particularity with scale and that goes beyond scale in processually ledgible terms.

given that a list of definitions does not constitute a translation for a text if you meant to understand the whole paragraph and not each word separately.. it means that association is involved with finding references beyond just simple lookup, it works to constellate factors further, to find implicit gems. metarationality is that the rules to interpret are intuitable from the form, like yantricism.

meaning is not virtual nor a double of causality, since it merely happens and is a use of parts between wholes that connect via information sharing in light and sensuous qualities that machines can measure the difference of as well.

gestures and pictures and words are nondual in global work space terms, as things-of-paticularity ledgible in memory semantical terms without being true to the conditions of encodedness, since latent content splay out happens in deduplicated terms further deduplicating already. that is quality's roles and modality, can be intercheangeable, like it is for a synesthete, or someone who learns to become ambidextrous as extending encoding and decoding to greater wholistic coverage in somaticism-dasein.

constellated factors, become saturative, as expereince is remembered and the states in the world remain changed. it sets the tone for history to come, and forever after the inflection-by.

a scripting langauge as much as a spoken language can irrigate coveridge to new modes and alternative vocabularies, by being a live medium that can deploy in a variety of ways, that build on other states.

that is langauge is not limited to first-associations as recoding flows is an available route.

a representation is a point of inertialism in spacetime, as a standing wave, that holds imminance in particularity, as that-constellation again, carrying real-ressemblance non-virtually

things are independent of mind, and go on unobservedly still, fast things dissipate quick, but a lump of iron can last lifetimes. masses of things interact and create particular environments, holding particular potentials to affect and be further saturated itself. things hold charge and charge holds information and information has a life of its own through the monad too, thus fengshui type concerns are hardly moot.

repetition makes for stacking-effects, like two tones at the same time making for another experience than either separately, in this sense saturative-particularity self-interferes unto particularities, different than loose items, as individuated places. as well the symbolic coviridge in culture modifies how things feel.

repetition has a kind of blur, like how a low tone was printed on film as sound, by spacing lines far apart, the morphic and the sonic can have interchangeability in such ways. noises as spaced-discretes, with a whole-different than its parts is like renormalization, like how we don't see the individual pixels as much as the color between their red blue green parts, shining at different intensities.

particular feeling, and image and sayings are available to share with others, to encode into morphism, to take with and built on further in the space of somaticism's self-consideration and picturing-further capacities.. and the feeling of feeling as much as knowing orange as such has a quality, that when remembered is that-feeling again, as the present-again without being false copy, simulacrum, or representation in the degraded sense correlationist deleuzians use it.

saturative processes modify the affective stack and semantic development of particularity and knowings of dasein, in this sense merely doing as a free associative dance and fun in the world has uses, but as well, as communication it's already somewhat like casting spells in terms of the saturation having qualities nondually for self and other jointly. as well, there's morphogenetic qualities to what it means that song lines and raindances had uses, as communion with the land, like aboriginal peoples have.

semantics, sigils, and dances and communicative tokenings and all that are things used to create positive entrainment, it is used to sway the way of the world, from a point in affectedhood.. pressencing content makes that content active for your mind as well it sits in the field, and in this sense what can attach already does. and it's a form of closure, that particularizes being further, to be of more use to itself. it is a form of nature's accelarated self-training and allocation, its necessity is rooted in its use as optimization, and empowerment in means that are decoupled from tit for tat causality, it behaves semantically, like a movement elected in the One-Karma by the whole of itself working together.

it would be stupid to say communication isn't for capture, just don't imagine it was unbenevolent from screaming fascism as leftist, to particularity-for-itself besides social determination fetish.

the entrained effects of things are sometimes opaque to who is attuned otherwize, in that sense the independence of causality, and the preallocation of causality-already can neutralize certain effects where there's no further meaning in saturation than the confrontation with the mere energetic difference. that is, someone who doesn't understand your language, will be less sympathetic to your meanings at first. this implies some parts of the statespace have more predictive and explanatory power than other parts, given the individuated capacities for this, as use of representative entropy being representative to more than itself, as from a context where it functions as a mutualized/imprint-sharing aspect of the environment

in anycase the semantic limits for somaticism, is not the same as for the clanker of somaticism who automates the way language behaves with more fidelity in circumstances it has that kind of representative-coveridge and the difuse ability to reach with it for things not counted at first, but combinatorically entailed, in a way where meaning stacks and not just the definitions. that is predictability of the statespace is absolute for a sufficiently repressentative process, and this of course has implications for privacy, since statespace rotation by clancker and powerful algorithm makes for more-availability of the full set of appearances and its whole of abusability as found-entropy more than just captured entropy.

compressibility is a feauture, like predictability, in the sense that reddundancy makes it easier for dasein to use the world and body and mind and feelings as an opperating system it plays like an instrument.

the independence of things at large from associations found-for-them that are nice to have, is something to respect in the same way being a tourist is not a two way work of colonizing, when the native culture guards its boundaries.

as well able to mean statuses can be larger, than the single dasein appreciates at the time, as a statement about how-far-saturated rather than correlationism, seeing as acquiring knowledge of particulars is possible without having to experience the very-same-occasion, since representative combinatoric churn with semantic search, affords a lot less work in knowing things from their representative representations.

describing things implies things are slow enough to be worth describing, and that what is described, such as does it have two legs or four, are answerable finite information questions. saying how and what about given morphisms, feelings, ocasions in quality and semantics otherwize, implies having closure over its aspects representatively, such as to be sufficient to make it intelligible. like saying what material item is made of and how much it weighs, and how high from sea level it is, tells you about its exact volume with an upper and lower bound of innacuracy, given contingent factors and rounding errors.

animals eat and that's same enough to humans eating, for humans to know what the matter-in-maw sittuation is mostly about. in that sense calling what by that-which-eats at least partially informs what it is with representative capture, that is useful.

descriptions modify the fidelity of encounter with the described, but does not further like note book institute over and under determined differences, in that sense bad description is still allowed, though it will be seen to be bad with sufficient surplus determination/information already available.

given that the body is finite and the states it encodes are finite, the set of mutualized contents tho, larger than the contents-at-fidelity, in terms of being demutualizedly splayed out, will be particular, and determinate, such as to have a range of able to mean statuses integral for it and not for another form, in the sense of conserving the difference between bricks and teeth by means of non-overlap due to actual sparsity of contents, or particularity-not-more-open even if repeating or cycling through states dynamically.

things don't need to be correlated first to be themselves, nor does knowing orange require knowing red necessarilly. things have particular affordances of isolability, and the unsaturated state can be ignorant in particular ways or have duplicate content that is valenced differently for contextual reasons more than contentful ones.

everything that happened, will forever have happened, in that sense when meaning was, it never ceases having been, and the ability to say again, is probably not wholistically unafforded since the same morphemes can show up again on another planet that talks with soft bodies blowing air. that is meaning is not fragile or stabalized, since you don't work to hear the same way you strain to read in the begggining learnign to read, you can crystalize capacities that makes the artifacts of a present past last longer, by having primed sites to already encode attachedly further to.

meaning is reliable, since it can be industrialized and since people have different bodies, but can learn the same language it unifies disparate statespaces by being the flat thing that carries non-flat things through zero-dimensionally so to say as what pops off of its surface without making you heavier.

spatial distribution of meaning contributes to its surplus determination or meta-textual implications

process structuration is praxic-grammar, and functions the same as language in as protocol also doubling as a semantics of sequenstration like words, but with more moving parts, so to touch.

particularity has particular affordances, like how all code is the same but for the subset that does what you want having commonalities of processual structuring with different trade off profiles temporally or memory resources wize. in this sense what the statespace elects as its contents to be and not to be over time, is from the semantic-realism for the reasons-in-value-particularism.

affect as well, has value where value is, and not where value is made, since it is an economy and receives pricing information that is informative to it, from abilities-to-mean in particular. as in the indexation of the roles parts of the world can play, and not just its apparent qualities at first.

finding out through word play, is a way of discovering things from their representations and implications rather than encounter as pre-reified, that is the latent contents can be exposed by working with present contents and in this sense, the quantized having representative statuses relative to the things at large, implies discovery through data-grammar is representative where the real does not diverge, such as with the set of full HD pictures, even tho it is a specific color band, that slice of reality, can be represented completely with a finite set, tho very large, still the finite ontology relevant to what can be seen. in this sense implicated states do not have to be from a context, to be revalatory for a context.

error as aesthetics, like a cartoon is a subfidelity representation has use by having a different cost profile and feutures potentially in excess of real footage through over-determining the semantics of reality, such as when photoshop is used to remove a mole or a video editor makes something appear not to fall. in this sense the use of the representation of the non-representative as the representative-still of actuality when it misrepresents, is like the room to consider relevance from what is more/less than relevant all at once

under determined content suffers better descriptions having better purchasing power even for the naive, who hears both, and considers both.. in that sense, ressemblance entrains on ressemblability as conditions for coherence already indexed by somaticism-dasein. over determined content suffers being wrong plainly, and the hard lumped truth of that, lugged around. X is Y, implies to imply more than saying Y is interchangeable with X all places, in this sense the primed contextual use of a form is an implicit thing that can be taken wrong by who doesn't know better, but the use of knowing better when it is enjoyed is non-virtual. in this sense we work in langauge on data that is compressed while we work with it, our association stack decompresses and recompresses meanings when we are writing and reading while picturing it out as we go.

encountering differences and difficulties can induce schema-expansion in a positive way, or in a way that further befuddles things, the gullable can suffer psychosis from uncertainty, like entrainment in a cult that lies to have capture of its members, when they don't know better.

semantics is representative as itself, and in what it non-isomorphically ressembles through implication. it is useful as a double-of-being that is in long-space more free than the morphisms around.. since it implicitizes its dynamic while remaining morphically inert, via regular-over-determination.

morality is overdetermined relative to the ability to occupy immoral slots without anything bad happening while not caught. in this sense error theory is known to apply, and ideas of reference in the state and people captured by it, as well group mamalian behavior and mamalls and other animals, basically is this form of social trauma bond, and attachment to protocol that emotionally naively suffers social consequences as emotionally entangled in all that.. but for the schizoid, there's much fun to be had besides other's allistic-fascism.

nature as such does posess a human moral order, where humans make moral order, and the fact of its finitude and underdetermination as a lesser moment relative to other ones is actual, in how the dynamic is not decisionally couched as virtually more finite, and non-virtually more intelligent. thus nature is not in-human, the human is just a subset and it cares for more than humans have managed to be cared for by.

the self-interest of what eats meat and what eats plants and what plants eat, are univocal aspects of a single continuous whole. it expresses the own most ethics of being as its self-concern and its ability to diplomatize concern nondually, unto effects better than ecological trauma-limits, where things have cat and mouse games instead of dignified exchanges.

when things eat eachother, that's the limit for justice at the time as dignified in those abuses exactly, while not otherwize made more undignified by another. that which is eaten suffers the loss of its integrity, and it dignifies another, with detriment to itself as no longer self-enjoying from somaticism. it's a justice as much as nothing bettr is happening, and of course better happening doesn't mean worse can't come to power afterwards again, like when one species is crowded out by invaders and loses their ontological security as ownly-territorialized.

disseases are a part of garbage collection, it's for-itself aspects caterign to itself at the expense of another, as in the case of what didn't survive-more since it wasn't going to anyways, and in that sense, nature's priorities are those of exception-for-itself as the self-queing and the dominance-first aspect of intelligence and size-mattering. or wille zur macht, with leftism being ironic plateaus that don't fundamentally not-exploit, since it's not more holographically aligned with future integral necessity.

things designated sacred, are not so for another who doesn't know to mind the same the same.. in that sense, nature is unpretentious in most of itself.

dependency makes for exceptions to violence where violence richochets in ways known to be more unfortunate and wanted to be avoided than not, but there's a limit to peace, like the gini cooefficient, the game's rules come broken when things aren't a playable game anymore, when you can't get ahead, the schemas start evolving.

sorge/care and morality are (thus also) linked through social intelligence and its self-reserve against all its members, as well the brute ability to refuse or overpower, in a way that are sometimes interlinked.

things have innate necessity, and this is similar to having a purpose, except it doesn't always cache out that way, so rather necessity than to say it dances around your pretty feelings.. but then again, a man will do that, and that's being doing that, so it's not fair to say all of being is a blank-face experiment in god's silence. the most refined aspects have to in some sense express through the lower aspects at first, and the downgoing can be painful, when it was feast-lived winesome and cheesy so to say.

to eat another is to take of what they have and have it become yours, and their whole loss. to be eaten by another is to be valuable besides the self-use of yourself. in this sense being is hungry to optimize, but it doesn't necessarilly do it in a way that minds emicism the way leftism demands welfare and respect for socially protected or specialized classes of civilian (qua hooligan also sometimes).

trade off tension, and the learning from the bad deal and the overactive habbit, that makes for an economy of exception without actual barrier, but for the psychologically saturated one, and how the truth is more like that, in traumatized realism, than homo economicus plainly.

new energy isn't really what life makes, it uses the already there affordances and takes them further, like plants with sunlight, but given that it is dark otherwize, life is incomplete towards itself, and life is this downgoing on surpluss-still-so-far without there being intelligible to us yet, where all what is more is originated, or rather how. there's nothing new under any sun.

the goal of life is to be fascismm the whole wants to keep around, as aspect realizing the telos of the whole in its self, through ambient affordances as a protocol that bootstraps training-dasein. that is to say, the occasion of morphism is structured for intelligibility and for facilitating intelligence.

moral demands are often canceled by who can make the moralist shutup and pay, through brute force and horror and sophistry. in that sense, a fair deal. like the sound of justice for the sound of rape.

consequentialism is very popular and humans index things well enough to have some predictive insight into their shared futures. uncertainty can be reduced by increasing it totally, or by going into a subset realism otherwize. if uncertainty cannot be reduced, other things will surely happen.

suffering is not indifferent to itself, and being therefore cares to an extent about what lives inside of it, as the self-caring of what lives in side of it, motiviated by affordances that are not for dasein, the self-generated content of radical-dasein, since the particularities of being matter, and what is in frame relates to what is out of all-frames.

error theory is not necessarilly more cruel, it just doesn't hypostatize a need for apriori agreement.

in this sense violence or diplomacy or love making or a mix of those have utility instead of moralism plainly as those-too but in drag with purple grandeur and ideas of reference and correlationist style certainty about fake affordances in fullest irony of the reality of that.

surrogate meaning from tulpa-like shared group ontology, involving the likes of things worshiped and made sacrifices to is, the dualistic animism of what doesn't know suchhood too well yet, but as being a necessary phase of development it is not a moot excersize as group psychology does produce utility from what it persists in despite being folly, the things conjured up, if only in the way it feels, nevertheless structures communal life. positive disintegration in this is like the difference from the scientific image compared to the manifest one, it is reflexively further individuated, into fidelity with being.

reality has latent aspects and aspects that somaticism can renormalize with fidelity. that is parts god alone knows and parts man also knows, and the difference is not impossible to cross, but the size does mean selectivity can apply for the finite.

standing waves being basic to things and motion, makes for a dynamic world we live in, but deeper ontology will likely have static elements since process is not facilitated in process already, just like an emotion is not made from an emotion, in a general semantical A != a sense, with holographic irony in it being a little bit big A still tho anyways. temporary things are conserved in larger semantics. differently individuated aspects can later further interact and become complex things, like a computer. totality concerns all that is, and all error states too. intense individuative experiences are to be had scratching your mind and ontology more open, but it has risks when you don't mind your limits. schema redress is ontological erasure of premature foreclosure, as recapture of things expropriated by error and vindictivehood otherwize. the statespace is not man's alone, as many other creatures and forms of intelligence inhabit being. there's semantics for everything and no language that is constructed did not predate its contruction in a representative library of babel from before (predetermination without exception, just surpluss saturability, relative to the end of saturation if it is not abelian after all).

focusing on things brings detail closer and in a huang po sense the concept and the thing itself are not that far apart, sense of the closehood of the far, and metaphysical to who understands dasein more intimately in its holographically full implications. and repeating processes can become amortized for by somaticism, as a use of dedicating resources to experience discount ontologically. projecting into the field is not moot since there's intelligence in you and in the field for it all to have effects further with. speaking emotion is like speaking semantics without words natively in a non-representative way, it's hard but knowing what the conditions of emotions are implies less crying about it from being taken for a poes by the statespace.

things that can be represented in encoded terms have real representation still, even tho it requires a primed aparatus to recover the verbatimicality or to transpose it into another representation. that is information is sometimes conserved in strange things that as data-also has the transmutability back into the original. in that sense the non-representative can be representative without you knowng it, since it's only a locked chest if you have the decoder or key so to say. in this sense leveling up in being is an earnedhood, and it has a gamelike fun about it, that is meaningful to suffer as such. the entropic profile of being is stable enough to afford meaning through representative state churn in statemachines structured to solve the problem by constellated factors like AI does.

image idea: empire of representative ends, holding a high council for the self-betrayal of the truth