being neutral relative to how unlike charges attach, implies saturation or anti-saturation with two-extremes as saying of a complex plane that vertical-asymetry solves knottings of mal-orientation otherwize
not-determined-if-I-don't-allow-it-ism as a way the universe sits in repression in another quality and experiences positivity without reason in a further quality still, as the conservation of particulars between states, where the load can be shared asymmetrically between different qualities
particularity is determinate
some particularity changes, the fact of any particularity,
as giving of the form of that possibility,
implies non-negotiable-possibility as the fixed-particularity
relative fixture of particularity,
is like when a heavy thing can move small things,
but small things don't move the heavy thing.
particularity where it happens, doubles as genuine-asymmetry.
yet there is a limit to thinking of it as asymmetry.
fundamental fixed particularity that is not relatively fixed,
implies no-correlative-other against which it doubles,
thus it cannot be asymmetrical, because,
it does not belong to itself under the identity of the Dual.
fact of the past being past, implies that the state-before
is forever before, even if it constellates the same again.
some possibility is fixed, tho it had not happened yet;
after it happens, its fixture is oriented other way around.
having to die, is implied for all humans who are not with us anymore,
that's most humans so far.
quality-translation happens where lorrenz transformations occur.
a motor can be { given electricity, and it will turn, alternatively,
turned manually, and it will emit electricity. }
some particularity of one kind, can be cast otherwize, through processes.
<a clause used twice, stated once>, { <implied-clause-injection-start> reads for side A,
<implied-clause-injection-start> as well, for side B}
negative-conversion of size, into effort, as eliding-some-size,
& retaining implied semantic identity, via paratactic capacity,
facilitated by markers, & scaled overall,
less than repetition otherwize by default.
determination-further, implies not-only determination
indeterminacy is not implied by determination-further
determination as given, with other things,
is integral to determinacy.
interface between chaotic elements and ordered elements as a room that changes themes and coloring half way in
***
liminality-salvation: correlationist uses uncertainty, to say salvation is where knowledge is not, as a typical form of dualism that delights in being-determined-ironically
like trying to say balancing the transistor at the flickering point makes it, non-causal. .. it is still determinate, now just with temporal excess.
a spectrum can have two polarities of intensity, as well a neutral or zero point in the middle that's three states that combines to make a monism or an nquanty non-ultimately-divsioned manifold calling that indeterminacy is naive
willing-response, and determinism and how middle point is used to say, not-determined, but determined-determiningly, as if to say valence is not real, you can shift the attractor and then fall in, as if having set polarities to a midway point. getting-it-right and failing is language of doing but relying on the middle, is a determination the doing of being-determined as if to say nondual, but only in the center as <a particularist form of> repression at the edges
that symmetry breaking implies an asymetrical baseline and finding the right offset allows the cosmological neutrality to susspend the warping asymetry being pulled into semantically incompatible directions
it's a unilateral duality, what feeling is, since it is attached to half of what happens, and the other half lives implicitly. meaning that change-allows-notice-of-change through the differentialism it makes as a stiring but that implies availability within a default that is not at rest that means we know something of on which side of things consciousness lives not-dualism, but half-ism where it's two qualities under the same monad, and a third ubiquity, which is proportion
the neuron is not a but-a-thought of itself
error theory is implied by morality, since to function it has to make an exception to remaining good and unreciprocal of harm, thus it incriminates itself, as a necessity of having to use force to achieve emotional-semantic overdetermination according to group-norms, as a policy besides empathy actually
the moral lipstick and drag with ugly motel and ciggy and wig moment is that...
self-remmuneration through ascetticism is implied in the attach-not-attach thing, for semantic particularity where the irony remains pure-willing-surpluss as only-differentiator, the according to the split, as philosophical-decision-centrism makes it that you cannot appreciate the mind-independent-determination, but have to look for indetermination and things other than regularity-universally to do a typical western judgement-and-salvation ploy, in a mode of aesthetic nonduality
the correlationist needs to say as leftist.. not-oedipus, but communism, as if social determination fetish is not implied in both.
not the law of the One, but this anti-particularism, that tries to sit in the space of self-evisceration due to hatred of determination
"it's not determination," it's offering-up-everything-and-surrendering-by-choosing, as a dramatization of surplus on oedipality that does not manage to remain-out-of-determination
di-ference implies between-two as a polyference
its identity is a uniference, since not mediationally or co-herently couched, but there merely, as the unitary fact-of its own possibility, as morphism and semantics, non-morphically with affect
ritual of not-choice-by-default, thus have to work to earn redemption from given-assymetry, in the schellingian sense of confronted with all god's past, as all god's karma, to be shared with holographically as the one karma of the singular one
"without atachment or aversion" the space of not-choosing as mystical to a westerner, as having somewhere to be his unconscious with, as a dualism that maintains the integrity by using constellatory language, as if ritually-intgrated and not already-connected << budhist gnosticism as an anti-hermeticism, is a transitionalism, like christianity (not-yet vs yet-already)
whole is of determinate universal particularity
every particular is a concrete universality
and like light, it can be represented semantically
as use of associative over determination of tokens
to stand representatively as what they are not
in a combinatorics of implication, with more complex rules
than is glyph stackerlieness alone.
***
alterity as thrown-into-the-mush, without instructions then talks about the extrusion-into-the-monad from unity (below plank’s length qua the timeless)
plurality is within the whole-as-one, implying uniference (non-2/di-ferential), since unitary with refractive splitting and temporal quality-in-imminance as phase-space particularity relative to the mere-fact-without-detail
detail is then repetition of the-same, as morphism and non-morphic particularity
complexity is where detail is, since informational
non-informational is another-quality as quality realism, like imagination (seeing red actually without looking at a red light with eyes), as quantum ink, a feature of being, related to morphism, but that is not morphic-merely
description is holographic self-representation of being
into-the-monad = into the share-server where the night cleaves the light into separate units as delimited by finitude/particularity/determination
self-prepositionalizing-relative-self-already implies self and Self have differences such that view-from-dasein as scoped but not bracketted off is the concrete universal form of limited-seeing that is not-entirely-limited, it is inside-of-itself, as itself-merely, thus not the distinction between in not meaning as, it means in-as, like vision-in-One
the disenchantment baked into the form of an aesthetics, as a semantics and emotional-rail-therefore for the autotransferentially self-powerless, functions as-the-aesthetic, thus to encode in it, implies having to abuse its normative valences for effects it structurally opts against, relative to having similar modes of what affectation with the same universals means, comes to in a saturative capacity where ordering matters
partiality is not enjoyed by binary, since the complete combinatorics are renegotiably available to sift through as so many sollutions to different problems using repetition of the same in different ways, as long-chain effects different from first-affodances. that is partiality is not a given, since completehood comes first, where the myth of the given excludes the conceptualized-content and not the access to the manifold as self-representative, that is concept formation affords sortalizing particulars, but awareness is not inherently pre-fragmented
bad argument:
a) reality is big
b) if it is described, that’s not final because it’s big
c) bigness means not real-this-thing, because that-thing-more-real, but I don’t believe in either, so I use ironic pittance against eachother
end of bad argument.
di-ference is between two, uniference is between one an itself, thus polyference is interior to uniference
ontos/on = greek word for being and existence and what there is in it
ontic is ontological, that means paritcularity
-tic is a suffix which means like or according-to
it is thus existic or what-ic, which is like.. oh okay..
but I prefer... ontology, since -ic can be like -ness, it can be as-if without that-ness as not-that, only-like, like a simulacrum or copy. correaltionist vibes
exceed assumes self-less-than-self, but it is itself merely, thus not mediationalist in a comparative mode, since that assumes access at fidelity ironically which is what I don’t need to do ironically
god defeats himself in many lives, animals have teeth
yes Totality without foundation, mediation or remainder since it is absolute and fairness is relative to its particularity
we cannot be particular while not identifying the form of our finitude/particularity as the way how being is and its limitations as integral, as well its self-access as integral, since the blind and deaf still feel and think
ontology cannot be only ontic since mind-indepdence is real, thus not idealism or panpsychism, mind is only mind where it is mind and not all is mind thus only psychism some places.
the self-totalizing of being implies being is defeated by itself, but as itself it does not have a relationship with itself, it is non-correlational
totalize is mos "not real," but you use the word as if negatively committed to it, thus it totalizes.. but you don’t believe in it.. no it is itself, there’s no secondary dramatization, when it has a form of a person and they lose to having to deal with better description it is totalizing in the way that means being and feeling one-upped but of course in the same universe by the same universe, different parts tho
real happens to you and you don’t happen to it, without it being itself happening to itself
reality is real, it has you, you are of it, as it.. subset of it.. and total too in some way
it says not-self-entertaining, but in saying so, means something else
non-thetic includes thetic and non-thetic, but avoid leaving out an important half, which is that: fiction is in the real, but the real is not in fiction
since making fiction more primary than the real still implies it is the real-first affording fiction, which if it happens, according-to-fiction implies reality does not need to follow its own rules, but as having fiction it includes representation at least for it following its own stipulations, as ways then so many times over to feel otherwize than is the given way about the given things.
non-lingual is exactly where it is heading, we are non-thetic as ontology an we speak pure-being as emotion-also
if you can affirm the negative, then it implies affirming the positive, you can't make a false-limitation that requires the false thing to be true to make sense: that is to say, appealing to the being-conceptual of possibilities-of-understanding something nominally put to being-more-than-understandable, implies surplus-indexing into the matter-anyways. to explain things is to situate it in a symbolic economy that has travelership as interpretable-elsewhere, the assciative depth of the signifiers relates to ratios and quiddities in reality, and affords indexing of states-at-large via non-isomorphic representation the being-spatialized of logical-happenings as but-happening and logically in terms of affordances semantically conneted coming demonstrated as the concept's difference entailed by its meaning when something exhibits the effects unto that match-for-meaning.. a decisionalist struggles with settling-as-choosing as a heteronomy that is being's own most settlment also.. possibilities of happening, as matter-praxis/code-made-ontologically-implemented-as-running has particular affordances in the state space of the real
a) physics measures the size and location of energy, as well its type
b) the way we feel is not measured by physics
c) thus the way we feel is metaphysics
d) we feel for real
e) thus metaphysics is actual
priviledge is leftist concept, being is one-whole, it is in some parts better than itself and in other parts worse
survives? everything that is in the library of babel for semantics, pictures as well quality-as-data, treating it as spatial, and combinatoric, the shapes-of-consciousness all are forms of the given, where they are instantiated-without-instantiation as given-merely
universality is not dependent on something else, it does not need a foundation since it is already and was always and will always be, and being is not only space-time or quality, it is more than that necessarilly
thus not relative-frames with a subset-representation, but the whole library of babel for both words and all possible images up to a finite size, like full HD images, it makes a large set but it exhausts the medium representationally for that grain of fidelity in those terms as being a subset of being that addresses within the semantics of its own possibility, all what is possible in that medium as a total-given that is not-relative since it is merely-itself
the implied top-down and not-bottom up is a vector of misrepresentation, where top-down supposedly is bottomless and the alternative which is “frame-independent” is then correct, but as meaning not-the-monad-of-monism it is dualism as particularism-sans-universality which is of course nominal as a concrete unversality anyways, thus it is the foreclosed-interior-of-philosophical-decision-emicism speaking of undeterminedness-as-determinate-particularity-already, which is a performative contradiction that is afforded seeming-power if only to be identified that way.
then there's this..
a) it’s a perspective because I decided
b) because it’s a perspective it’s not other things
c) perspective means subjective
d) subjective things are not real
e) since perspectives-imply-not-real-access, then by calling it transformations between perspectives, it implies mediationalism as not-directly-ism as a limitance that socializes in deontology
f) argument does not obtain because other things do, that are not limited to perspectivalism since not philosophical decision, but non-thetic qua non-philosophy/science
philosophical decision is foreclosed because if you can design it in pixels or words, then it is already in the library of babel, and you would have merely made use of the latent available possibility, rather than inventing the possibility or bringing it into existence.
thus too anti-natalism thinks from it-exists-if-born and not-if-not, but for me, we are always and either as a particular-locally or as a particular merely, which is nondual with the absolute.
uniferent-particularity as a field-polyferently of
uniferences which between them are
different or polyferent-further-wize.
identifying uniference, as a difference-at-first,
for being-also when uniferent-already,
as(-without-as) uniferent-already
saying of particularity qua some uniferent particular,
semantically located, or otherwize of-notice more manifestly,
provisions differential progress or regress, as lorrenz-inflection,
by a site-of-self-owning-concentration (of the One, as vision-in-One).
determinacy is ubiquitous, as particularity
semantic indexation of the identity of particularity,
can be representatively-false, or representatively-true,
exhaustively for particularity as itself, suchly.
morphisms that clash sometimes smash and break, particularizing further,
morphism changes in ways that remain assymetrically invariant
morphism-with-vision-in-One as the eye and the seeing-about it,
has invariants that can succumb or trump stronger or weaker invariants,
(around-)besides-otherwize.
encoding-particularity in another particularity,
as original-modified-unto-another-orignal,
in a transformation, that is reversible,
affords decoding-back-to-particularity,
from particularity-otherwize.
semantics-also: regularized-scheme-dependent conservation,
of identities between reversible mutations
when settlementiziation occurs {
invariants that are {
stronger of remaining invariant,
may enjoy that, lest they are negative-egoic libidenally.
weaker of remaining invariant,
may dispair upon all those entailments,
lest they are negative-egoic libidenally.
}
} implies (libidenal-)polarities
as symmetries and anti-symmetries about particularity
& uniferent-ressemblance-invariancy-under-translation
representation, for vision-in-One,
as its semantiful contents, affords <reading>
as parataxial semantic-downstream of para-representation,
as gain-of-representation, for vision-in-One.
insurance against dismemberment of desiring-integrity,
is not gauranteed indefinitely; this condition, however,
does not apply, to the whole (BwO/L'Un-sans-re-etre).
words afford semantic-saturativity's metempsychosory localization,
from off the surface of an unrelated quality.
(unrelation does not exclude <as>-non-relationships.)
description extends-as semantics.
semantics extends as lie, and truth,
^- as truth-merely, since extensionate-that-way.
representation as a saturative given, affords further-irrigation,
of the implicative space that representational-constellation, affords,
(yantric-)derivation-about, into representations-further(ed-)some
uni-riv-ation is not derivative.
^- yet remains clone-without-Clonedhood )
read as autopolyferizedhood, as non-past-tense,
as both self-displeasure, & self-pleasure,
as individuated-without-individuation (
saturative-unilation forms avoidances,
that are attempted to be protected,
but may cancel with eachother,
as able-to-become: no-longer-protected.
protection happens while alive, as the fact of that fact.
as well topologically, as properties-according-to-hysterises
nomadic particulars as environment-portably,
can be interupted by the environment, non-portably,
or portably otherwize.
non-portable means attached-to-larger-particular,
in a way that does not come loose, without:
more force than is about its own extent
of-the-individuated-without-individuation,
further individuancialization, happens.
schemes of protection of fixture-otherwize,
can gain nomadicality, at the cost of having,
to remain attached in intervals, as when eating,
or remaining pinned by gravity to a surface,
when not airborne, as assymetrical-accretion-affordance.
accretions can cancel or compliment,
depending on the totality semantic particularity.
irony about schemes eventually leads to repolarization of particulars.
total radicality is being's own
some of the extent of total particularity,
suffers temperature.
temperature and other namable aspects of the same whole,
modulate the range of effects.
during lack, reserve, affords temporary-irony,
as aspect-of-environment in-surpluss,
when, like in winter, a lack, all around,
doth suchly abound.
surpluss-lack overcomes temporary reserve,
which proves too short a supply of irony.
technology pushes the limit of irony,
and its costs down, by accreting assymetry,
in modes that afford such trade offs,
as the real's aspects, having temporal-inertia,
through lorrenz transformation effects,
as translation conservedly,
of extents of particular qualities,
proportionately, throughout the monad.
sorge is premized upon reserve, via,
lorrentz transformation based,
quality-assymetry-facet-translation.
sorge is as-dominance-against, for the particular,
not as particular-Sorge-as-vision-in-One's-reserve-to-see,
but particular-otherwize, as then without-reserve-coaffordment,
where whole or partial alchemization/cancellation is destined.
being is free to be itself.