morphisms have combinatoric properties, when made into pieces and treated as assemblables-further in terms of stackings and possitionings next-to, and other prepositionalisms, as spatial-logic.
morphic language encodes semantics, as semantics-already, in a case where coming-to-association is from capacity-already, as means to decode-for, what is given-about, but not in a morphic-particularity qua linguistic ediface.
the all: by means of a given given, already.
given aspects associated-already in terms of morphically-derived irrigation of thought-already to closure arround unbefore saturated particularities, local and at large, at the same time, as the-Same-also at the same time: provide means to fronting and post-disclosure saturation, for semantics further.
the ability for morphism to be morphism is not given by morphism in its own instance as itself, but is given-already, as from what does not suffer parts, as what is more whole, and with particularity, non-discretely, than a boundaried-event.
boundaried-events, are in spherical-geometry terms, the roundness that relates to flatness, by roling evenly all around, as what occasions in that aspect, a totality off rolling-off, as moved-around, and turnt, sense of the historical-particular, that becomes translated over time, as aspect of the given-already, featuring as the given-merely, without event of givenness-secondarilly.
permission is not a factor in integrity-at-production as morphic-particular, but is a factor in'tegrity loss, as a distribution of space, to where dense-clingings-together otherwize would remaind abounding.
a whole morphism like play dough, may be divided into many pieces, which overall have more surface area, but less size and volume individually, compared to when smooshed together otherwize.
surface area increases, and other aspects decrease proportionately.
as well without the splitting off, a main blob of play dough may be flattened out widely, to increase its surface area, but at a cost of having to become thinner in another way, as having the conserved totality, of itself, between different qualities, of which there is a whole of conservation, but a moment of distribution between the properties of conservation, as affording the mutation of contellation and mode of constellated-quality, without being the mutation of the fact of a given intensity being-part-of-still-and-already.
rotational aspects as well, as independence of one morphism relative to its state in having to share an overall rotation given the whole it is attached to, but as having become whole-for-itself it gains freedoms relative to intensities in affixed-particularity.
take the peel of a citrus fruit, remove the meat of the fruit, cut the peel of it it into a many tiny squares, then flatten them and dry them out in the sun. next, write a number on each one, on the white underside, going up as a count until all are numbered. on the side with color, write a letter. next, make a grid (on transparent film), as large as your alphabet, and on the other axis write out numberings again up to the size of your alphabet. place the tiny squares on the lettered grid (may want to use an adhesive) to form arbitrary sentences, constellated with the meanings of the grid slots, use tiny squares that have a secondary message to give between eachother, in terms of the independence of their written ordering and lettering on their sides. observe the film from both sides. contemplate this further.
pieces of paper all together in a bag, with written words on one side, position numbers on the other side, to say where and where further in a derivable and implied text the given words appear.
counting in whole words, rather than letters implies using smaller index numbers overall, but larger chunks. determinatory, saying which word slot so far, in a count of how many words.
cap a sentence at 16 words, and it affords using four bits, to say where a given word must be. use another nibble to function as lookup-references for words, where instead of being limited to only sixteen words, the dictionary changes which words are available after each next word in a contextually expansive stacking system.
nibble sized possitions under sentence identifiers.
vocabulary options: it, swaps, takes, gives, and, 0..9, escape (16 options in total)
given "it takes 3 and gives 5", what able to mean statuses for this morphism can we value?
what does it receive this quantity of and in returning, does it give the same type but more or of a different type?
it need not be underdetermined in a saturated environment.
on paper making use of the same pieces can be done by splaying it out and connecting it with lines, graph style and implying for oders to use the same nodes multiply separately at the same time.
from given scheme, there's implied able-to-mean orders, relative to this regular-interpretation about four bit units next to eachother, of course it helps to map error states to something meaningful to always recover the use of data, by making information dance to remain coherent for any given sequence
resource morality, like opera is about the weakkness of woman as a poetry that ironically defeats its own limitations and feels proud about it. like fucking an ass.
the complete thing that counts as less than itself, like a negative-number bank note, where your having it, is like owning a debt bond and trading it for something positive.
rebranding as exploiting latent aspects not already saturated from all angles, as having translatory value, relative to the emotionally-done before way of seeming about the same, in the Same.
truth of lie, like language, able to call a word half half and mean for it to mean half relative to a full, and what that takes, gives, and means meaningfully, after all, as the determination-without-right relative to conserved-semantics, as the lie that ressembles through association for another, what is not implied by itself, and in that, such contents as concerns proportion without remaining proportionate to the meaning, only its requirements for being worked with.
a smaller calculator can be helpful also, with larger sums, by putting them in pieces and storing the steps and results on demand, but not all results-already, sense of being good-for indirectly.
demand-already as not-supply-yet-imminantism, as the moment of positive edification for hypostatiz
ed lack, relative to found givens or ends-of-ends, not yet enmeaned.
the sense, slipperyness, is not to be over-generalized, since someone that already understood, need not complain of difficulty as if a socialism of the stupid was in place. it needs no leveling down for any good, since the less can climb, and that is as furtherent and backholding as what happened in all as effect of litteracy historically.
(viz.) Don't expect to be entertained by the truth, in a way that suits you, you can't complain another's description away, as if to make it less descriptive, by blocking with use of a social baseline relative to yourself as if all were to be equally or baseline-relatively affected, instead of particularity happening, the statisical real becomes moral defense against actual after birth of irony-before on their side of the fence.
form of language-already, as aspect of social determination, that self-fetishizes when it fails to generalize the semantic condition to morphism-generally and ontology-generally, as a correlationist-realism of centroid inertialism that maintains fiat-seeming for the naive that benfit from self-capture-wholisticism-with-enablative-exceptionality-to-self-rule-as-self-rule-self-interacting-negatively-relative-to-positively-disintegrated-ereignis-semantics-otherwize.
just-keep-writing-ism, and the desire to publish the value-already, sense of time-preference vs payload-size-utility-anyways-presently. of course, technology can help make an exception as writing-live on a website view where the server sends the new words and edits as they happen, on live articles that can be read while they are written further, and as constellations where the same words functionn in different larger-text-bodies like books of multiple texts, as a relenser of given information into arbitrary permutations that can be branded as a whole-independently, that carries relations morphologically with other texts, but is not in some sense degraded as own-thing for being distributed between itself as superset-in-subset, where the superset is as own-for-itself with local-implications from that-constraint, &subset, relative to the larger continuity of itself, but with which, in parataxis it losses the constraint-surpluss of less-unto-more-as-less, that can have more still later, as consideration for individuative-saturation in litterature and non-litterature.
the game: you have to provide a linear-style-access to data larger than your hard-drive, by means of functionally generating the relevant things on demand, in a time frame that is smooth
as compression golf, where the interface at the user end is as if a normal harddrive, and file access, but underneath data is a web of data that re-references data-already or comes generated by functions, that can rely also on referenced data.
I'll start.. imagine you have stored half of all possible two pixel, images, as having a list with each color, which is the set of all possible one pixel images.. to get any two pixel image, an index number is provided, at first, it works linearly, taking a given color and then duplicating it, when those style of two pixel images are finished the range of the index beyond has to rely on a regular offset, and exhaust each style combinatorically, such as to take from the stored given and then modify it in a regular way to produce another color.
this way, for the cost of all colors and a set of functions that help with the offsets, an interface can be made that scrolls through all possible two pixel images, without storing all possible two pixel images to do it.
in this way, on-demand-completeness as-if-more is possible to present, using less-than-what-stores-everything. that implies being can represent itself, by relying on kolmogorov complexity for general classes of relevant problems, or by being small enough to not have that matter yet.
if you have half of all possible FHD images ready to hand, then getting the other half, is just a matter of flipping the bits on the representative information in the half that is there, to get the symmetrical opposite implied on the other side.
in other words, if you had half of all the possible bytes, as 128 different values of eight bits, then getting the other half is as easy as reading off where it would be if you pretended the first half is the later half, but instead of a mere lookup, you first flip the bits, then you get the other implied half, without having to have 256 varieties of eight bits.
language-like things, as a form of indexation that is an ad-hoc aesthetics on rails, that affords interpretation about non-interpreted-already through regularized scheme of decomposition into more of the same, as a slide through difference where use comes from primedness-already as association already. sense of hydrating rich qualia by thin-qualitative means as a grappling-to-fore of meaning-constellatedly, relative to a minimal-inspirant.
Description content is one thing, as a use of a thought again, encoded in matter and open for a standard of structured interpretation, which leads again to semantic coverage about ontology at large, if only referentially, in noting such possibilities.
Contentful description in political roles, assists valence transition and conceptual attachment, in the socius, as saturative givens, that function in the same slot as a norm, but is not limited to being a normativity, instead it concerns an affective-real of saturation and semantic self-availability between units of a similar enough individuation.
Divergeance relative to a base of semantic ontological platforming, implies evaluability relative to the baseline, as a benchmarking of semantic purchasing powr, or turn-over in the case of as lie, standing in for the truth otherwize.
Grammar of ontological self relation, as a subset of havable semantics.
Novelty relative to gaarp does not mean much to me, unless it's novel and gaarp is me, faced with new toys and meanings for play and profit.
Mundane use of the extra-logical, that goes socially unnoted, platforms the difference of non-logic, in what as the given form of reality, affords that to be useful anyways, in this sense, semantics is not limite to representation in a truthful mode, but has the truth of its ability to opperate with surplus relative to what is instantiable besides semantically as able-to-be-thought.
Without sufficient priming already, the schematic reserve to make sense of unfamiliar thicc descriptive interiors, is missing, and the outer most empty givens about that semanto-aesthetic-logic is present-for-immediacy.
Found reference, as ontological self-edification as being's part, being-being, becoming self-revalatory, with attachment associatively to a morphic-encoding unto reuptake-ability of semantics and what affect comes with for whom it can when it does.
domain specific logic exemplifies the property of its own uniqueness through the universal as aspect of itself, that is considerable as a set of moments and semantically concrete, universal-particulars for scheme of particularity, a thematic given subseting totality through inflection by it.
tempted to say, there are no supersets, since all aspects of being are given in their own moment, which implies supersets are relative to sets, yet for being, the issue of which set is always answered by the same noises relating to the one, the whole, the totality of possibilities and non-possibilities. it can feel supersetly, since the word exists, thus necessity has use for this part of itself.
items of a set, that can be arranged into combinations as patterned elaborations of a standard list of elements.
combinations of morphisms like words, are simple in terms of the mere forms stacking. yet meaning is not this kind of simple stacking, it packs on in ways that backreference and elaborates into many pictures as well implied logics in the sequences of moments pictured. its a bag and it asks you to reach in, and feel about the space of consideration, according to an inspirant that is less than what it unpacks to.
metaphorician says, A is B, and means for A to be A still.
an associator says B is there for A, but is not B.
a general semanticicist says A is also there for non-A as A.
to have a general interpretation means any set of bytes can be given you, and you can strike a use for them, in a mode of decoding that is error-state incorporated such as to map all illegal states systemically to legal states, in what still is oriented to surplus on semantic effort invested in doing the legwork decodatively.
think about the semantics that incorporates error as usefully remapped from a mode of structural self-anticipation, functions as a general aesthetics in terms of having no foul play semantically, but affording a self-regularized fit for any possible states about itself, at any length.
(that thought was very complete, it feels like. that means something as a kind of subset autoimplementation of the thing.)
semantics affords constructing conditions of semanticity about what before initiation in the scheme of construction, is as non-semantics, relative to schemed-for considerations.
scheme, like a word's combinatoric range expansion of possible meaning, relative to a fixed dictionary it was not part of before, inflects wholes it provides coverage for in pre-sensiblized terms.
language as run way, individuates conceptual particularisms, for compatible-already readers. &as mintings worldsome, of a sudden, what otherwize lay dormant.
positive resolve to come, for when there is false {
separation: confusion (requires showcasing the sufficiency of less).
joining: splitting (requires semantic scaffolding of differences).
}
mobius strip has a unity of inner and outer, making for a third that is both without being either.
the fact of a given word saturatively, implies the bracket is there to be occupied, by the real, as self-ressemblance, in non-ressembling and non-relating terms, since not-as-as, meaning while not ressembling, still the real being itself, non-ressemblantly, as itself merely.
that means if you call it not-that, then the idea about it's being as if not-that, would be afforded, as a semantic way of seeming, without necessarilly having the able-to-mean status in ably-meaning terms, tho meaning still, as meaning that it does not mean, while meaning to mean
without a foundation, as self-extension of foundation-without-foundation, the fact of an idea, is the idea of a fact as itself, without being but-idea, nor in all senses, but-fact.
a faithful description, can inform one looking for something specific, about what he is looking for, and how it will be distinguishable, as a giving of example, without having of any representation ressemblantly, in ressembling terms. that is, the words do not have it in them to be the example a picture would provide, yet functionally, it can irrigate effects, as if having been the picture of the kind of fruit exactly. in that sense, the use of description is to inform by non-example, what is the value otherwize of example, as instilling a knowing what to look for, about particular givens, in a necessary coherence boundary that is in-scheme for the way how universal particularity is.
a) things without proportion do exist (non-local/discrete particularity).
b) ratio as relates to rationality, is about proportion.
c) non-rational semantics, has to do with particularity of non-morphic qualities, like the quality of quality as considered in the category of itself, being exhibited the difference of itself when it happens.
qualitative fact, is more like the difference of category without category, as relates to non-quantized aspects, in already-ontological terms (also).
that there is seeing, is to do with form, but is not in-form, as a feature of mere-morphicality, thus seeing is to do with morphism, without being wholly the sum of only morphic effects.
the consideration of an effect without surface area, is there where feynman diagrams concern virtual photon, as aspect of reality, that is not reducible to aspects on scene in merely-morphic terms.
when writing a program, one makes use of the capacities of hardware. those capacities function as a permission gate without being about permission in a social sense. similarly, the constraints on semantics besides computation, also deals with the constraints that computationalism faces, where it concerns any combinatoric pigeon holing of particularity as an economism inheriting from spatial logic, the limit of freedom and identity.
to get an effect out of a computer, implies having rattified-means for specific ends, without that being an event of novelty or social determination, as the permission-by-form of code-qua-data in particular.
that is to say, the limit of computational effects, relates to more than computation, in terms of how you can linguistically value mundane transitions in non-mundane ways, as a memory-mutationalism merely, that when patterned and stacked in effects, as operating on mutations as informing further mutations, all it can do is cycle states.
thus in a semantically primed scheme, the function of computation is to entrain states in ways that provide surplus on semantic investment, like a mechanical advantage, thinking about a pulley.
non-propositional abstraction is like saying there's things thought can do, and remember and use-again, that is like what computers can do, but concerns qualities and proportions and semantics and encodabilities, that do not have representation computationally due to being couched in another quality than concerns spacetime logic merely/only/at-all.
concept-already implies not falsifiable, since implying-already the difference of its own meaning, as the fact of that meaning being there to be had.
"the falsification of the number two was successful, it is not real, because we could not prove it" - a false theory that employs surplus givenness, relative to its bid to take that givenness away, thus the statement is falsified structurally, by meaning what it cannot, as meaning-anyways, but not with capture upon its object-intended-to-be.
after reading a sentence, understanding it, is like an all at onceness, that remains fresh for a while. << what is the case as described, dramatizes what happens, before it becomes so, but as it becomes so.
it is axiomatically given, as a description's being descriptive, since there's no A affording B, the A is afforded in its A-ness without leaving to B.
being after being said to be, from being said to be, as the description of its own effect. it sacrifices something, the identity of itself, without its being about itself. it is not about something else, yet as morphism, when not understood as language, it is as-something-else, yet retains a similar effect, in terms of being remembered the shape-of, tho not the meaning, thus implying the meaning, without having meant it, in a way that is understood to be meaning that way, without being understood to be that meaning, in that way.
at the same time as its own necessity, implies that it happens during in a way that does not hypostatizes a refusability about its conditions of binding while descriptive (being the case as entailed to be or as non-representationally the truth). seeming-so, while being-so.
entailed by entailedness, implies given by the concrete universal fact of itself, as reached through the mundane, by scheme of implication, as implicated through form of implication as latent aspect, relative to stipulation-surface area as a finite coverage of possibility for description, relative to the extent of seemability-through-semantics-anyways-actually.
the medium has a mode that is called concept, but as medium still, the mode is not isolated, thus not causing of effects under itself, since the medium is owner-already of all its possible modes. thus the mode of making all relative to concept, is a slavery by what is not the concept enslaving itself, but is then the affordance for the narrow-seeming, without the narrowness-actually, in the use of seeming so.
something saturative happens during description. a conditioning in the language user, that poises them for richer interpretation, according to found schemes. the process of coming to language use, about articles of language, not saturated in the local case before, implies the becoming rhetorical tender, of what at first had no such status, implying, there are individuation conditions for descriptive purchase, and that what it means after individuation, is not canceled by the lack before.
implying a picture as seen, can gain aspects of organization about itself, in a way that segments the experience qualitatively differently, without modifying the detailed particulars at large. the aspect-about as organization-for, but not as morphic-difference-to-occasion, implies being able to call a tool by a use, you didn't understand it had before adequate schematic priming.
scraping feces off your rear, to clean it, by means of a sea shell, or with tickets for social norm violation, implies the seemings about the shell or tickets without those associations for it, makes for its identity free from that form of priming about it, retaining a quality of unsaturated seeming, relative to thinking of it first as tool for a hygine related purpose.
the individuation of semantically segmented qualities about the given, implies a becoming reified of semantic-particularism as a mode of concrete universal affectedness with seemings-in-particular, as a form of seeming as such.
dasein with a toolbox of ready to go meanings (from day one, like the difference from pleasant and unpleasant stimuli), and a whole range of meanings that are incompatible, and how that has to do with individuative experiences, in terms of gaining concepts to be able to think given semantics with, without only being semantical, in the naive mode of having the difference but not knowing it.
you cannot give someone who does not understand a lick of english, an english book and expect him to be sensible about it in a short time, when there's no tools, and he is only with it, and has no further reference.
the category of english as a non-category unto someone in particular implies the seeming of english about a stack of writing, is not so, nor known even by such names, it is like an aesthetics without home, seen to be, as a kind of pattern, but without a transparent identity of meaning.
what does it mean to call something by the wrong name and then get used to it and mind the difference where it matters? an expansion of a semantic schema, yes.. what else? a case of exception to the rule, that facilitates the rule still without leaving coherence where the error is regular enough.
a lack of lack, is about the absence of particular-implied-absence, without being about the case of lack as lack that can be fixed by taking more away. it notes the absence of absence as a positivity, without needing positivity to do it, the two negatives make a non-negative, in the repetition of their identity with themselves.
the value of value, is different, because it navigates about a general quality, in a way that has to do with the application of the given to itself doubly, as relating to the details-of-being-valuable of value, as a moment that has different meanings of ownership for the same. as saying, the difference between two fiat systems, as inflection, that implicates a loss or gain relative to transitioning a quantity between two qualities of quantity, in a way that is supposed to conserve the quality of itself in proportion to the other qualitative-quantality.
much about the value of value depends on the willingness between two parties to make a transaction in which an exchange of two different qualities happens, and provides benefit on both sides relative to processes of value conservation or consumption or conversion, outside of the given transaction.
value proportionalized at the point of transaction, implies assymetrical forms of benefit, as tenders unto value, functioning as a lateral-conservation of value across qualitative domains. in this sense fiatism relativizes other qualities of value to a form of non-commensurate bracketting-the-same, that does not preserve proportionate value in a way that is rational for a single desirer in terms of a single kind of desire satiation. the value of value is not being proportionate under fiat, about things all reachable from a tenderous-motivator of value-letting in proportion to price in a way that is not as locally decoupled as barter is in terms of what this-for-that means, since one-this-for-many-thats, is implied by fiatism.
printing non-money, that can be sold for money, is like printing money, but without having to. in that sense, fiat is about non-fiat, in a way that effectuates a detteritorialized lorrenz force drag or accelaration, on mobility in a way that is non-locally coupled, but in logistical signal terms still.
without willingness to accept fiat, there's no purchasing power had via fiat, and for barter as well, without a deal, there is no deal. when a fiat transaction system fails wholesale, and the bank notes have no more acceptability, there is a non-conservation of implied value-translatability. where as had value been couched in the food-value or drug-value of a substance, then even without trade, there is self-benefitability after economic loss of mobility on those goods.
interpretation scheme for binary:
0 means count one of base N and add it to the accumulated variable to be outputed when done intepreting a binary sequence in this way
1 means add one to the value of the base N.
by default the base value is one, meaning the binary sequence of one character, consisting of a mere 0, has the value of one as a numerical output.
1110 -> base = 2, base = 3, base = 4, then one unit of base, giving an output of four.
of course we can go further and say that given the output of a sequence, and its base value, we can further interpret the same binary sequence from the start or from the end going to the start, and repeat that again and again for an abritrary amount of cycles and expect determinate results that increase and are different.
each sequence thus becomes a pattern generator, that keeps giving definite particularity, for an infinite amount of cycles, if you keep going too.
from this there's is implied a use of computational process or attentional biological equivalent in cognition terms, that can make sense of the binary sequences and produce a result according to the scheme of interpretation.
the scheme is accumulative, and affords itteration in patterned ways further building on the result of one cycle. specifying how many cycles, implies a definite result. the result will likely be larger than the amount of bits it takes to store a pattern and how many cycles in it to go, in that sense, it affords compression when the scheme is used with many numbers, and the idea is to store sequences in a regular table and afford rehydrated lookup by running the pattern generator function for the scheme on the stored sequences to provide the result desired, without having to have stored the full size of the output intended.
the scheme is of course limited but in trinary, with an added token to minus the base value, long bounded patterns are possible.
why go with all this? besides the fun of the idea and the potential data savings?
to prove that interpretation in various ways can be made mechanical and that there is a determinate property to constraint in itterative processes where a base identity is used as tender for structured accumulation. as a realist article of ontology that is stipulated at first, but not determined by choice, instead as that-form, it runs that form-of-constraint, and has a result, that is implied to be definite and particular, even if you didn't run the test of it yet.
it says that there's an ability to arrange things in ways that yield definite effects, and that for each thing you try, there's a way it plays out, as a kind of particularism of determination by the real.
this reliability of determination implied by determinate constraint, is like an ethics in terms of being like-law a bindingness, through not being otherwize.
the test of saturative semantics is also in being able to produce a pattern matching the specification, and to test its proprties as something you can have for yourself. it implies semantics are reliable in a way that gives feature unto instantiating an example, where before no such construction or interpretation was ready to go. it implies conceptual gain, and becomings local of a way of saying's meaning.
visually, you can imagine packing dots in a circle, with gaps to use the empty space as the tender for zeros as non-dots, in a binary protocol, that can start from any point in the circle and potentially yield a different result going around, as if to say multiple-kolmogorov complexity, where the sequence is not with a start or an end, but has in circularity, that ability to accumulate in one of two directions for each node as a chosen starting point, producing for a single cycle that way, a finite set of sequences, larger than what it took as seed entropy to get them.
the aspect of circle, lends itself as platform for the logic, which in processual terms means jump or loop back to a code block's start and call those lines with modified variables.
the implied thing also is parataxis. as interpreting between units, what is not implied in the form of units there merely. it involves having an ontology of decoding or interpretation.
something reifies, when you learn and associate semantic content, you haven't before. it grows upon you, that you come organized.
we are not contesting realism, since if you got this far, you know in some sense where we are, if you followed faithfully word for word, making sense of it all and seeing it now in the wholism of a saturated moment.
linger here. it's like a table, when I ask you to imagine the top of it, the legs, the planks underneath, and the sides, and to do so at once, then it is the seeing more than the eye can gulp in one look. the idea of seeing more, without the form of it as foundness being strange, yet called to strangeness, here, we see that we deal in more dimensionality at the same time, as a distributed colony of many cells, or many datums, in co-mutative-constellation-semanto-affectively as aspect of the whole for itself as whole-in-Whole.
we can take any binary sequence and have a meaning for it besides itself, and not only the accumulated base and result, we can use the result and convert it to binary and use it as input for a new cycle of interpretation upon it, perhaps using the saturated base to come further in a way that connects the first instance with the last, in conserving something between them, that would be different than had we done the interpreting separately with a base N value fresh-set at 1.
there will be many more possible semantic schemes to use on the same binary sequences. having a set of functions in code, that can do these different decodings on the same data, implies having ready to go potentially, the equivalent of having stored many different pieces of data, but it comes from the same starting entropy, just different decoding functions, in that sense compressed without compressedness.
available through landmark in determinate-process, a notch in the pattern.
then where to with this, finally? if you can have patterns available, then organizing their availability on demand, is like having the ability to put down an I-owe-you-<that>-token, and then replacing the stand-in-references, with the generated data it is associated with that is larger than the reference, as a function of having a mutualized eco system where many texts, use replacements to be smaller, but in a way where there's no dictionary, only the reliability of pattern-reachable-already by functional means, costing the compute and the decoder code size, but gaining through function-for-many-texts, the return on investment, in terms of reduced storage burden over all. in this sense too, when references are generated as a pattern, that themselves call on other references to become pattern generated-for, then the degree of indirection affords trading time-getting-patterned for storage costs of having to have the verbatim result of functional patternings locally.
converting the temporal into the morphic-spatial is a process of assigning value to mutable states, at the right time, in the right order, as an allocation of what is already present, in one register but not another, to the other that is manifestly already present, as a conversion between qualities as such.
binary sequence interpretance as {
pixels, with the last two bytes counting as the image width, affords then building a picture from mere data, given that it is long enough to make whole rgb colors and the width number for where the long list of mere pixel values need to be segmented into lines as wide as the image is.
sound, sampling the numbers as if they were floating point values, also taking default meta data from the end.
etc.
}
philosophically it means a lot if you extrapolate all the implications upstream and downstream of given features of ontology, with all these interpretative modes for the given, multiply-the-same.
meaning keeps providing coverage for things umbrelled under its grammar as ontological-self-relation, and with regularizable cost schemes